Biodiversity assessment using next-generation sequencing: comparison of phylogenetic and functional diversity between Nebraska grasslands

Dakota L. Ahrendsen, Shelly K. Aust, P. Roxanne Kellar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global biodiversity is declining rapidly as a consequence of anthropogenic changes to the environment. Traditional diversity indices such as species richness have been used to assess biodiversity, but recent arguments call for a more comprehensive assessment that includes both phylogenetic and functional diversity (PD and FD, respectively). Many PD metrics have been developed, but few empirical studies have compared metrics across sites with the goal of understanding their application to characterizing biodiversity. In this study, 17 PD metrics, four traditional diversity indices, and one measure of FD were calculated and compared between two Nebraska grasslands. PD metrics were calculated from robust phylogenies estimated from next-generation sequencing data of 45 species. Traditional indices were calculated using species abundance data, and FD was quantified by measuring the phylogenetic signal, K, of specific leaf area (SLA). Results showed that PD metrics and traditional indices were not always correlated, and various PD metrics characterized biodiversity differently. In addition, phylogenies estimated from >80 genes were more robust than single- or dual-gene phylogenies resulting in more reliable PD metrics. K of SLA indicated random trait assembly in all sites. Results suggested that metrics that identify phylogenetic structure and relatedness can provide information to conservation planners about the ability of a community to persist in an unpredictable future. A combination of these results with those of future investigations applying PD and FD metrics to varying communities will support concrete recommendations to conservation planners about how to incorporate these metrics into the selection of priority regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-108
Number of pages20
JournalPlant Systematics and Evolution
Volume302
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

functional diversity
grasslands
grassland
biodiversity
phylogenetics
phylogeny
diversity index
leaf area
gene
relatedness
species richness
comparison
genes
species diversity
index

Keywords

  • Angiosperms
  • Community ecology
  • Conservation prioritization
  • Illumina
  • Phylogenetic diversity
  • Rosids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Biodiversity assessment using next-generation sequencing : comparison of phylogenetic and functional diversity between Nebraska grasslands. / Ahrendsen, Dakota L.; Aust, Shelly K.; Roxanne Kellar, P.

In: Plant Systematics and Evolution, Vol. 302, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 89-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d05ea6a8a784e94af82a4f2f366e103,
title = "Biodiversity assessment using next-generation sequencing: comparison of phylogenetic and functional diversity between Nebraska grasslands",
abstract = "Global biodiversity is declining rapidly as a consequence of anthropogenic changes to the environment. Traditional diversity indices such as species richness have been used to assess biodiversity, but recent arguments call for a more comprehensive assessment that includes both phylogenetic and functional diversity (PD and FD, respectively). Many PD metrics have been developed, but few empirical studies have compared metrics across sites with the goal of understanding their application to characterizing biodiversity. In this study, 17 PD metrics, four traditional diversity indices, and one measure of FD were calculated and compared between two Nebraska grasslands. PD metrics were calculated from robust phylogenies estimated from next-generation sequencing data of 45 species. Traditional indices were calculated using species abundance data, and FD was quantified by measuring the phylogenetic signal, K, of specific leaf area (SLA). Results showed that PD metrics and traditional indices were not always correlated, and various PD metrics characterized biodiversity differently. In addition, phylogenies estimated from >80 genes were more robust than single- or dual-gene phylogenies resulting in more reliable PD metrics. K of SLA indicated random trait assembly in all sites. Results suggested that metrics that identify phylogenetic structure and relatedness can provide information to conservation planners about the ability of a community to persist in an unpredictable future. A combination of these results with those of future investigations applying PD and FD metrics to varying communities will support concrete recommendations to conservation planners about how to incorporate these metrics into the selection of priority regions.",
keywords = "Angiosperms, Community ecology, Conservation prioritization, Illumina, Phylogenetic diversity, Rosids",
author = "Ahrendsen, {Dakota L.} and Aust, {Shelly K.} and {Roxanne Kellar}, P.",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00606-015-1246-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "302",
pages = "89--108",
journal = "Plant Systematics and Evolution",
issn = "0378-2697",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity assessment using next-generation sequencing

T2 - comparison of phylogenetic and functional diversity between Nebraska grasslands

AU - Ahrendsen, Dakota L.

AU - Aust, Shelly K.

AU - Roxanne Kellar, P.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Global biodiversity is declining rapidly as a consequence of anthropogenic changes to the environment. Traditional diversity indices such as species richness have been used to assess biodiversity, but recent arguments call for a more comprehensive assessment that includes both phylogenetic and functional diversity (PD and FD, respectively). Many PD metrics have been developed, but few empirical studies have compared metrics across sites with the goal of understanding their application to characterizing biodiversity. In this study, 17 PD metrics, four traditional diversity indices, and one measure of FD were calculated and compared between two Nebraska grasslands. PD metrics were calculated from robust phylogenies estimated from next-generation sequencing data of 45 species. Traditional indices were calculated using species abundance data, and FD was quantified by measuring the phylogenetic signal, K, of specific leaf area (SLA). Results showed that PD metrics and traditional indices were not always correlated, and various PD metrics characterized biodiversity differently. In addition, phylogenies estimated from >80 genes were more robust than single- or dual-gene phylogenies resulting in more reliable PD metrics. K of SLA indicated random trait assembly in all sites. Results suggested that metrics that identify phylogenetic structure and relatedness can provide information to conservation planners about the ability of a community to persist in an unpredictable future. A combination of these results with those of future investigations applying PD and FD metrics to varying communities will support concrete recommendations to conservation planners about how to incorporate these metrics into the selection of priority regions.

AB - Global biodiversity is declining rapidly as a consequence of anthropogenic changes to the environment. Traditional diversity indices such as species richness have been used to assess biodiversity, but recent arguments call for a more comprehensive assessment that includes both phylogenetic and functional diversity (PD and FD, respectively). Many PD metrics have been developed, but few empirical studies have compared metrics across sites with the goal of understanding their application to characterizing biodiversity. In this study, 17 PD metrics, four traditional diversity indices, and one measure of FD were calculated and compared between two Nebraska grasslands. PD metrics were calculated from robust phylogenies estimated from next-generation sequencing data of 45 species. Traditional indices were calculated using species abundance data, and FD was quantified by measuring the phylogenetic signal, K, of specific leaf area (SLA). Results showed that PD metrics and traditional indices were not always correlated, and various PD metrics characterized biodiversity differently. In addition, phylogenies estimated from >80 genes were more robust than single- or dual-gene phylogenies resulting in more reliable PD metrics. K of SLA indicated random trait assembly in all sites. Results suggested that metrics that identify phylogenetic structure and relatedness can provide information to conservation planners about the ability of a community to persist in an unpredictable future. A combination of these results with those of future investigations applying PD and FD metrics to varying communities will support concrete recommendations to conservation planners about how to incorporate these metrics into the selection of priority regions.

KW - Angiosperms

KW - Community ecology

KW - Conservation prioritization

KW - Illumina

KW - Phylogenetic diversity

KW - Rosids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952861565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952861565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00606-015-1246-6

DO - 10.1007/s00606-015-1246-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84952861565

VL - 302

SP - 89

EP - 108

JO - Plant Systematics and Evolution

JF - Plant Systematics and Evolution

SN - 0378-2697

IS - 1

ER -