Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: A help as well as a hindrance?

M. Vythilingam, K. S. Blair, D. McCaffrey, M. Scaramozza, M. Jones, M. Nakic, K. Mondillo, K. Hadd, O. Bonne, D. G.V. Mitchell, D. S. Pine, D. S. Charney, R. J.R. Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1445-1455
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological medicine
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Task Performance and Analysis
Healthy Volunteers
Wounds and Injuries
Attentional Bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder : A help as well as a hindrance? / Vythilingam, M.; Blair, K. S.; McCaffrey, D.; Scaramozza, M.; Jones, M.; Nakic, M.; Mondillo, K.; Hadd, K.; Bonne, O.; Mitchell, D. G.V.; Pine, D. S.; Charney, D. S.; Blair, R. J.R.

In: Psychological medicine, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.10.2007, p. 1445-1455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vythilingam, M, Blair, KS, McCaffrey, D, Scaramozza, M, Jones, M, Nakic, M, Mondillo, K, Hadd, K, Bonne, O, Mitchell, DGV, Pine, DS, Charney, DS & Blair, RJR 2007, 'Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: A help as well as a hindrance?', Psychological medicine, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1445-1455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170700092X
Vythilingam, M. ; Blair, K. S. ; McCaffrey, D. ; Scaramozza, M. ; Jones, M. ; Nakic, M. ; Mondillo, K. ; Hadd, K. ; Bonne, O. ; Mitchell, D. G.V. ; Pine, D. S. ; Charney, D. S. ; Blair, R. J.R. / Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder : A help as well as a hindrance?. In: Psychological medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 1445-1455.
@article{dfbde0afc5444ba0af8fc2a0845f8df7,
title = "Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: A help as well as a hindrance?",
abstract = "Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.",
author = "M. Vythilingam and Blair, {K. S.} and D. McCaffrey and M. Scaramozza and M. Jones and M. Nakic and K. Mondillo and K. Hadd and O. Bonne and Mitchell, {D. G.V.} and Pine, {D. S.} and Charney, {D. S.} and Blair, {R. J.R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S003329170700092X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1445--1455",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder

T2 - A help as well as a hindrance?

AU - Vythilingam, M.

AU - Blair, K. S.

AU - McCaffrey, D.

AU - Scaramozza, M.

AU - Jones, M.

AU - Nakic, M.

AU - Mondillo, K.

AU - Hadd, K.

AU - Bonne, O.

AU - Mitchell, D. G.V.

AU - Pine, D. S.

AU - Charney, D. S.

AU - Blair, R. J.R.

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.

AB - Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348872152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348872152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S003329170700092X

DO - 10.1017/S003329170700092X

M3 - Article

C2 - 17559703

AN - SCOPUS:35348872152

VL - 37

SP - 1445

EP - 1455

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 10

ER -