Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models

Christopher R Bilder, Joshua M. Tebbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Group testing involves pooling individual items together and testing them simultaneously for a rare binary trait. Whether the goal is to estimate the prevalence of the trait or to identify those individuals that possess it, group testing can provide substantial benefits when compared with testing subjects individually. Recently, group-testing regression models have been proposed as a way to incorporate covariates when estimating trait prevalence. In this paper, we examine these models by comparing fits obtained from individual and group testing samples. Relative bias and efficiency measures are used to assess the accuracy and precision of the resulting estimates using different grouping strategies. We also investigate the agreement of individual and group-testing regression estimates for various grouping strategies and the effects of group size selection. Depending on how groups are formed, our results show that group-testing regression models can perform very well when compared with the analogous models based on individual observations. However, different grouping strategies can provide very different results in finite samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-80
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Group Testing
Regression Model
Testing
Grouping
Regression Estimate
Pooling
Estimate
Regression model
Covariates
Model-based
Binary
Strategy

Keywords

  • Binary data
  • Diagnostic test
  • Generalized linear model
  • Pooling
  • Prevalence
  • Unobserved data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models. / Bilder, Christopher R; Tebbs, Joshua M.

In: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 67-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5530d7a93a4e4d669892e143b63e58cc,
title = "Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models",
abstract = "Group testing involves pooling individual items together and testing them simultaneously for a rare binary trait. Whether the goal is to estimate the prevalence of the trait or to identify those individuals that possess it, group testing can provide substantial benefits when compared with testing subjects individually. Recently, group-testing regression models have been proposed as a way to incorporate covariates when estimating trait prevalence. In this paper, we examine these models by comparing fits obtained from individual and group testing samples. Relative bias and efficiency measures are used to assess the accuracy and precision of the resulting estimates using different grouping strategies. We also investigate the agreement of individual and group-testing regression estimates for various grouping strategies and the effects of group size selection. Depending on how groups are formed, our results show that group-testing regression models can perform very well when compared with the analogous models based on individual observations. However, different grouping strategies can provide very different results in finite samples.",
keywords = "Binary data, Diagnostic test, Generalized linear model, Pooling, Prevalence, Unobserved data",
author = "Bilder, {Christopher R} and Tebbs, {Joshua M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00949650701608990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "67--80",
journal = "Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation",
issn = "0094-9655",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models

AU - Bilder, Christopher R

AU - Tebbs, Joshua M.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Group testing involves pooling individual items together and testing them simultaneously for a rare binary trait. Whether the goal is to estimate the prevalence of the trait or to identify those individuals that possess it, group testing can provide substantial benefits when compared with testing subjects individually. Recently, group-testing regression models have been proposed as a way to incorporate covariates when estimating trait prevalence. In this paper, we examine these models by comparing fits obtained from individual and group testing samples. Relative bias and efficiency measures are used to assess the accuracy and precision of the resulting estimates using different grouping strategies. We also investigate the agreement of individual and group-testing regression estimates for various grouping strategies and the effects of group size selection. Depending on how groups are formed, our results show that group-testing regression models can perform very well when compared with the analogous models based on individual observations. However, different grouping strategies can provide very different results in finite samples.

AB - Group testing involves pooling individual items together and testing them simultaneously for a rare binary trait. Whether the goal is to estimate the prevalence of the trait or to identify those individuals that possess it, group testing can provide substantial benefits when compared with testing subjects individually. Recently, group-testing regression models have been proposed as a way to incorporate covariates when estimating trait prevalence. In this paper, we examine these models by comparing fits obtained from individual and group testing samples. Relative bias and efficiency measures are used to assess the accuracy and precision of the resulting estimates using different grouping strategies. We also investigate the agreement of individual and group-testing regression estimates for various grouping strategies and the effects of group size selection. Depending on how groups are formed, our results show that group-testing regression models can perform very well when compared with the analogous models based on individual observations. However, different grouping strategies can provide very different results in finite samples.

KW - Binary data

KW - Diagnostic test

KW - Generalized linear model

KW - Pooling

KW - Prevalence

KW - Unobserved data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049181973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049181973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00949650701608990

DO - 10.1080/00949650701608990

M3 - Article

C2 - 20046956

AN - SCOPUS:57049181973

VL - 79

SP - 67

EP - 80

JO - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation

JF - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation

SN - 0094-9655

IS - 1

ER -