Beyond liberals and conservatives to political genotypes and phenotypes

John R. Alford, Carolyn L. Funk, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past, most political scientists have been oblivious to the growing empirical evidence challenging environmental determinism. Professor Charney, apparently as a result of the fact that genes and the environment interact in a complex fashion, advocates that this passive unawareness be replaced by active denial. Science, however, does not advance by avoiding important relationships merely because they are complicated and, fortunately, science is not heeding Charney's ideologically-based fears. Molecular geneticists, often working in tandem with political scientists, are quickly moving beyond twin studies to identify the specific suites of genes and biological systems that predict variation in core political preferences, whatever labels those preferences might be given in a particular culture at a particular time. We sympathize with the fact that our empirical findings, like those of so many behavioral geneticists, make Charney uncomfortable; still, his critique serves up nothing new-empirically or otherwise. Just as analyses of the roots of sexual preferences cannot presumptively ignore genetics, neither can analyses of the roots of political preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-328
Number of pages8
JournalPerspectives on Politics
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

political scientist
twin studies
determinism
science
university teacher
anxiety
evidence
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Beyond liberals and conservatives to political genotypes and phenotypes. / Alford, John R.; Funk, Carolyn L.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 321-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Alford, John R. ; Funk, Carolyn L. ; Hibbing, John R. / Beyond liberals and conservatives to political genotypes and phenotypes. In: Perspectives on Politics. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 321-328.
@article{70ddb1cdf96941bfbbcbb602e031b67c,
title = "Beyond liberals and conservatives to political genotypes and phenotypes",
abstract = "In the past, most political scientists have been oblivious to the growing empirical evidence challenging environmental determinism. Professor Charney, apparently as a result of the fact that genes and the environment interact in a complex fashion, advocates that this passive unawareness be replaced by active denial. Science, however, does not advance by avoiding important relationships merely because they are complicated and, fortunately, science is not heeding Charney's ideologically-based fears. Molecular geneticists, often working in tandem with political scientists, are quickly moving beyond twin studies to identify the specific suites of genes and biological systems that predict variation in core political preferences, whatever labels those preferences might be given in a particular culture at a particular time. We sympathize with the fact that our empirical findings, like those of so many behavioral geneticists, make Charney uncomfortable; still, his critique serves up nothing new-empirically or otherwise. Just as analyses of the roots of sexual preferences cannot presumptively ignore genetics, neither can analyses of the roots of political preferences.",
author = "Alford, {John R.} and Funk, {Carolyn L.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1537592708080638",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "321--328",
journal = "Perspectives on Politics",
issn = "1537-5927",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond liberals and conservatives to political genotypes and phenotypes

AU - Alford, John R.

AU - Funk, Carolyn L.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - In the past, most political scientists have been oblivious to the growing empirical evidence challenging environmental determinism. Professor Charney, apparently as a result of the fact that genes and the environment interact in a complex fashion, advocates that this passive unawareness be replaced by active denial. Science, however, does not advance by avoiding important relationships merely because they are complicated and, fortunately, science is not heeding Charney's ideologically-based fears. Molecular geneticists, often working in tandem with political scientists, are quickly moving beyond twin studies to identify the specific suites of genes and biological systems that predict variation in core political preferences, whatever labels those preferences might be given in a particular culture at a particular time. We sympathize with the fact that our empirical findings, like those of so many behavioral geneticists, make Charney uncomfortable; still, his critique serves up nothing new-empirically or otherwise. Just as analyses of the roots of sexual preferences cannot presumptively ignore genetics, neither can analyses of the roots of political preferences.

AB - In the past, most political scientists have been oblivious to the growing empirical evidence challenging environmental determinism. Professor Charney, apparently as a result of the fact that genes and the environment interact in a complex fashion, advocates that this passive unawareness be replaced by active denial. Science, however, does not advance by avoiding important relationships merely because they are complicated and, fortunately, science is not heeding Charney's ideologically-based fears. Molecular geneticists, often working in tandem with political scientists, are quickly moving beyond twin studies to identify the specific suites of genes and biological systems that predict variation in core political preferences, whatever labels those preferences might be given in a particular culture at a particular time. We sympathize with the fact that our empirical findings, like those of so many behavioral geneticists, make Charney uncomfortable; still, his critique serves up nothing new-empirically or otherwise. Just as analyses of the roots of sexual preferences cannot presumptively ignore genetics, neither can analyses of the roots of political preferences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949145174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949145174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1537592708080638

DO - 10.1017/S1537592708080638

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:44949145174

VL - 6

SP - 321

EP - 328

JO - Perspectives on Politics

JF - Perspectives on Politics

SN - 1537-5927

IS - 2

ER -