Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility

Jocelyn J. Lippman Bell, Tamar Lordkipanidze, Natalie Cobb, Anna Dunaevsky-Hutt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-200
Number of pages8
JournalNeuron Glia Biology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010

Fingerprint

Dendritic Spines
Neuroglia
Synapses
Spine
Cerebellum
Purkinje Cells
Acids

Keywords

  • GluR2
  • Purkinje cell
  • Synaptogenesis
  • cerebellum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility. / Lippman Bell, Jocelyn J.; Lordkipanidze, Tamar; Cobb, Natalie; Dunaevsky-Hutt, Anna.

In: Neuron Glia Biology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.08.2010, p. 193-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lippman Bell, Jocelyn J. ; Lordkipanidze, Tamar ; Cobb, Natalie ; Dunaevsky-Hutt, Anna. / Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility. In: Neuron Glia Biology. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 193-200.
@article{78977c5cae0f4294b5c2fd7b8b85d2b1,
title = "Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility",
abstract = "In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.",
keywords = "GluR2, Purkinje cell, Synaptogenesis, cerebellum",
author = "{Lippman Bell}, {Jocelyn J.} and Tamar Lordkipanidze and Natalie Cobb and Anna Dunaevsky-Hutt",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1740925X10000165",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "193--200",
journal = "Neuron Glia Biology",
issn = "1740-925X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility

AU - Lippman Bell, Jocelyn J.

AU - Lordkipanidze, Tamar

AU - Cobb, Natalie

AU - Dunaevsky-Hutt, Anna

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.

AB - In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.

KW - GluR2

KW - Purkinje cell

KW - Synaptogenesis

KW - cerebellum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960358174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960358174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1740925X10000165

DO - 10.1017/S1740925X10000165

M3 - Article

C2 - 21044397

AN - SCOPUS:79960358174

VL - 6

SP - 193

EP - 200

JO - Neuron Glia Biology

JF - Neuron Glia Biology

SN - 1740-925X

IS - 3

ER -