Benefits of Slope Flattening

Kevin D. Schrum, Francisco Daniel Benicio De Albuquerque, Dean L. Sicking, Ron Faller, John D. Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The benefits of slope flattening were investigated by simulating accident costs with updated foreslope severities based on real-world accident data collected over a 7-year period in the State of Ohio. Functional classes considered were freeways, rural and urban arterials, and rural and urban local highways. Highways were modeled using the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP). Highway parameters considered in RSAP were slope steepness, roadway curvature, percent grade, longitudinal length, fill height, and lateral offset to the slope break point. Simulated accident costs were incorporated into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, where future users can specify installation costs, which tend to vary significantly from one location to another for slope flattening applications. Each functional class demonstrated slope flattening trends. On freeways and urban arterial highways, slopes should be no steeper than 1V:3H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was minimal. On rural arterial highways, the slope should be no steeper than 1V:4H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was also minimal. On local highways, the steepest slope should be 1V:3H, but the slope should be made as flat as possible because accident costs continued to decrease as the slope was flattened. © 2014

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-368
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Transportation Safety and Security
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Accidents
Roadsides
Highway systems
accident
Costs
costs
Spreadsheets
trend

Keywords

  • RSAP
  • benefit-cost analysis
  • embankments
  • roadside safety
  • roadside slopes
  • severity index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Schrum, K. D., De Albuquerque, F. D. B., Sicking, D. L., Faller, R., & Reid, J. D. (2014). Benefits of Slope Flattening. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 6(4), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2014.887597

Benefits of Slope Flattening. / Schrum, Kevin D.; De Albuquerque, Francisco Daniel Benicio; Sicking, Dean L.; Faller, Ron; Reid, John D.

In: Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 6, No. 4, 10.2014, p. 356-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schrum, KD, De Albuquerque, FDB, Sicking, DL, Faller, R & Reid, JD 2014, 'Benefits of Slope Flattening', Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2014.887597
Schrum, Kevin D. ; De Albuquerque, Francisco Daniel Benicio ; Sicking, Dean L. ; Faller, Ron ; Reid, John D. / Benefits of Slope Flattening. In: Journal of Transportation Safety and Security. 2014 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 356-368.
@article{2ae816a7699143e2b84645e383ae42e0,
title = "Benefits of Slope Flattening",
abstract = "The benefits of slope flattening were investigated by simulating accident costs with updated foreslope severities based on real-world accident data collected over a 7-year period in the State of Ohio. Functional classes considered were freeways, rural and urban arterials, and rural and urban local highways. Highways were modeled using the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP). Highway parameters considered in RSAP were slope steepness, roadway curvature, percent grade, longitudinal length, fill height, and lateral offset to the slope break point. Simulated accident costs were incorporated into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, where future users can specify installation costs, which tend to vary significantly from one location to another for slope flattening applications. Each functional class demonstrated slope flattening trends. On freeways and urban arterial highways, slopes should be no steeper than 1V:3H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was minimal. On rural arterial highways, the slope should be no steeper than 1V:4H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was also minimal. On local highways, the steepest slope should be 1V:3H, but the slope should be made as flat as possible because accident costs continued to decrease as the slope was flattened. {\circledC} 2014",
keywords = "RSAP, benefit-cost analysis, embankments, roadside safety, roadside slopes, severity index",
author = "Schrum, {Kevin D.} and {De Albuquerque}, {Francisco Daniel Benicio} and Sicking, {Dean L.} and Ron Faller and Reid, {John D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/19439962.2014.887597",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "356--368",
journal = "Journal of Transportation Safety and Security",
issn = "1943-9962",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of Slope Flattening

AU - Schrum, Kevin D.

AU - De Albuquerque, Francisco Daniel Benicio

AU - Sicking, Dean L.

AU - Faller, Ron

AU - Reid, John D.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - The benefits of slope flattening were investigated by simulating accident costs with updated foreslope severities based on real-world accident data collected over a 7-year period in the State of Ohio. Functional classes considered were freeways, rural and urban arterials, and rural and urban local highways. Highways were modeled using the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP). Highway parameters considered in RSAP were slope steepness, roadway curvature, percent grade, longitudinal length, fill height, and lateral offset to the slope break point. Simulated accident costs were incorporated into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, where future users can specify installation costs, which tend to vary significantly from one location to another for slope flattening applications. Each functional class demonstrated slope flattening trends. On freeways and urban arterial highways, slopes should be no steeper than 1V:3H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was minimal. On rural arterial highways, the slope should be no steeper than 1V:4H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was also minimal. On local highways, the steepest slope should be 1V:3H, but the slope should be made as flat as possible because accident costs continued to decrease as the slope was flattened. © 2014

AB - The benefits of slope flattening were investigated by simulating accident costs with updated foreslope severities based on real-world accident data collected over a 7-year period in the State of Ohio. Functional classes considered were freeways, rural and urban arterials, and rural and urban local highways. Highways were modeled using the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP). Highway parameters considered in RSAP were slope steepness, roadway curvature, percent grade, longitudinal length, fill height, and lateral offset to the slope break point. Simulated accident costs were incorporated into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, where future users can specify installation costs, which tend to vary significantly from one location to another for slope flattening applications. Each functional class demonstrated slope flattening trends. On freeways and urban arterial highways, slopes should be no steeper than 1V:3H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was minimal. On rural arterial highways, the slope should be no steeper than 1V:4H, and the benefit of flatter slopes was also minimal. On local highways, the steepest slope should be 1V:3H, but the slope should be made as flat as possible because accident costs continued to decrease as the slope was flattened. © 2014

KW - RSAP

KW - benefit-cost analysis

KW - embankments

KW - roadside safety

KW - roadside slopes

KW - severity index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899789432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899789432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19439962.2014.887597

DO - 10.1080/19439962.2014.887597

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899789432

VL - 6

SP - 356

EP - 368

JO - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

JF - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

SN - 1943-9962

IS - 4

ER -