Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis

Yuba R. Kandel, Michael T. McCarville, Eric A. Adee, Jason P. Bond, Martin I. Chilvers, Shawn P. Conley, Loren J. Giesler, Heather M. Kelly, Dean K. Malvick, Febina M. Mathew, John C. Rupe, Laura E. Sweets, Albert U. Tenuta, Kiersten A. Wise, Daren S. Mueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A meta-analytic approach was used to summarize data on the effects of fluopyram-amended seed treatment on sudden death syndrome (SDS) and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) in over 200 field trials conducted in 12 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2015. In those trials, two treatments-the commercial base (CB), and CB plus fluopyram (CBF)-were tested, and all disease and yield data were combined to conduct a random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analysis (test of moderators) to estimate percent control and yield response relative to CB. Overall, a 35% reduction in foliar disease and 295 kg/ha (7.6%) increase in yield were estimated for CBF relative to CB. Sowing date and geographic region affected both estimates. The variation in yield response was explained partially by disease severity (19%), geographic region (8%), and sowing date (10%) but not by the resistance level of the cultivar. The probability of not offsetting the cost of fluopyram was estimated on a range of grain prices and treatment cost combinations. There was a high probability (>80%) of yield gains when disease level was high in any cost–price combinations tested but very low when the foliar symptoms of the disease were absent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1093-1100
Number of pages8
JournalPlant disease
Volume102
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

seed treatment
meta-analysis
profitability
soybeans
death
sowing date
foliar diseases
disease severity
signs and symptoms (plants)
Ontario
Glycine max
field experimentation
Canada
cultivars
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Kandel, Y. R., McCarville, M. T., Adee, E. A., Bond, J. P., Chilvers, M. I., Conley, S. P., ... Mueller, D. S. (2018). Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis. Plant disease, 102(6), 1093-1100. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1540-RE

Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis. / Kandel, Yuba R.; McCarville, Michael T.; Adee, Eric A.; Bond, Jason P.; Chilvers, Martin I.; Conley, Shawn P.; Giesler, Loren J.; Kelly, Heather M.; Malvick, Dean K.; Mathew, Febina M.; Rupe, John C.; Sweets, Laura E.; Tenuta, Albert U.; Wise, Kiersten A.; Mueller, Daren S.

In: Plant disease, Vol. 102, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 1093-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kandel, YR, McCarville, MT, Adee, EA, Bond, JP, Chilvers, MI, Conley, SP, Giesler, LJ, Kelly, HM, Malvick, DK, Mathew, FM, Rupe, JC, Sweets, LE, Tenuta, AU, Wise, KA & Mueller, DS 2018, 'Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis', Plant disease, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1093-1100. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1540-RE
Kandel, Yuba R. ; McCarville, Michael T. ; Adee, Eric A. ; Bond, Jason P. ; Chilvers, Martin I. ; Conley, Shawn P. ; Giesler, Loren J. ; Kelly, Heather M. ; Malvick, Dean K. ; Mathew, Febina M. ; Rupe, John C. ; Sweets, Laura E. ; Tenuta, Albert U. ; Wise, Kiersten A. ; Mueller, Daren S. / Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis. In: Plant disease. 2018 ; Vol. 102, No. 6. pp. 1093-1100.
@article{20967422e9bf46ee9755250cd1835a1b,
title = "Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis",
abstract = "A meta-analytic approach was used to summarize data on the effects of fluopyram-amended seed treatment on sudden death syndrome (SDS) and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) in over 200 field trials conducted in 12 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2015. In those trials, two treatments-the commercial base (CB), and CB plus fluopyram (CBF)-were tested, and all disease and yield data were combined to conduct a random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analysis (test of moderators) to estimate percent control and yield response relative to CB. Overall, a 35{\%} reduction in foliar disease and 295 kg/ha (7.6{\%}) increase in yield were estimated for CBF relative to CB. Sowing date and geographic region affected both estimates. The variation in yield response was explained partially by disease severity (19{\%}), geographic region (8{\%}), and sowing date (10{\%}) but not by the resistance level of the cultivar. The probability of not offsetting the cost of fluopyram was estimated on a range of grain prices and treatment cost combinations. There was a high probability (>80{\%}) of yield gains when disease level was high in any cost–price combinations tested but very low when the foliar symptoms of the disease were absent.",
author = "Kandel, {Yuba R.} and McCarville, {Michael T.} and Adee, {Eric A.} and Bond, {Jason P.} and Chilvers, {Martin I.} and Conley, {Shawn P.} and Giesler, {Loren J.} and Kelly, {Heather M.} and Malvick, {Dean K.} and Mathew, {Febina M.} and Rupe, {John C.} and Sweets, {Laura E.} and Tenuta, {Albert U.} and Wise, {Kiersten A.} and Mueller, {Daren S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1540-RE",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1093--1100",
journal = "Plant Disease",
issn = "0191-2917",
publisher = "American Phytopathological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits and profitability of fluopyram-amended seed treatments for suppressing sudden death syndrome and protecting soybean yield a meta-analysis

AU - Kandel, Yuba R.

AU - McCarville, Michael T.

AU - Adee, Eric A.

AU - Bond, Jason P.

AU - Chilvers, Martin I.

AU - Conley, Shawn P.

AU - Giesler, Loren J.

AU - Kelly, Heather M.

AU - Malvick, Dean K.

AU - Mathew, Febina M.

AU - Rupe, John C.

AU - Sweets, Laura E.

AU - Tenuta, Albert U.

AU - Wise, Kiersten A.

AU - Mueller, Daren S.

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - A meta-analytic approach was used to summarize data on the effects of fluopyram-amended seed treatment on sudden death syndrome (SDS) and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) in over 200 field trials conducted in 12 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2015. In those trials, two treatments-the commercial base (CB), and CB plus fluopyram (CBF)-were tested, and all disease and yield data were combined to conduct a random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analysis (test of moderators) to estimate percent control and yield response relative to CB. Overall, a 35% reduction in foliar disease and 295 kg/ha (7.6%) increase in yield were estimated for CBF relative to CB. Sowing date and geographic region affected both estimates. The variation in yield response was explained partially by disease severity (19%), geographic region (8%), and sowing date (10%) but not by the resistance level of the cultivar. The probability of not offsetting the cost of fluopyram was estimated on a range of grain prices and treatment cost combinations. There was a high probability (>80%) of yield gains when disease level was high in any cost–price combinations tested but very low when the foliar symptoms of the disease were absent.

AB - A meta-analytic approach was used to summarize data on the effects of fluopyram-amended seed treatment on sudden death syndrome (SDS) and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) in over 200 field trials conducted in 12 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2015. In those trials, two treatments-the commercial base (CB), and CB plus fluopyram (CBF)-were tested, and all disease and yield data were combined to conduct a random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analysis (test of moderators) to estimate percent control and yield response relative to CB. Overall, a 35% reduction in foliar disease and 295 kg/ha (7.6%) increase in yield were estimated for CBF relative to CB. Sowing date and geographic region affected both estimates. The variation in yield response was explained partially by disease severity (19%), geographic region (8%), and sowing date (10%) but not by the resistance level of the cultivar. The probability of not offsetting the cost of fluopyram was estimated on a range of grain prices and treatment cost combinations. There was a high probability (>80%) of yield gains when disease level was high in any cost–price combinations tested but very low when the foliar symptoms of the disease were absent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047831816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047831816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1540-RE

DO - 10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1540-RE

M3 - Article

C2 - 30673444

AN - SCOPUS:85047831816

VL - 102

SP - 1093

EP - 1100

JO - Plant Disease

JF - Plant Disease

SN - 0191-2917

IS - 6

ER -