Behavioral Cues as Indicators of Deception in Structured Employment Interviews

Satoris S. Culbertson, William S. Weyhrauch, Christopher J. Waples

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine the use of behavioral cues to identify deception within structured interviews. In Study 1, participants engaged in mock interviews in which they were instructed to lie on specific questions that varied by person. Trained coders evaluated the presence and extent of deception cues in each videotaped response. Nine cues predicted responses as expected, demonstrating that, with careful scrutiny, it is possible to detect deception. In Study 2, participants, either informed or uninformed regarding deception cues, viewed five interviews and evaluated responses as being honest or deceptive. Participants also rated overall interview performance. Participants were unable to accurately distinguish lies from truths. Nevertheless, performance ratings differed on the basis of rater perceptions of truthfulness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-131
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Deception
Cues
Interviews
Employment interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Behavioral Cues as Indicators of Deception in Structured Employment Interviews. / Culbertson, Satoris S.; Weyhrauch, William S.; Waples, Christopher J.

In: International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 119-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1cfd637ef8684b1eaba403f6e3082e30,
title = "Behavioral Cues as Indicators of Deception in Structured Employment Interviews",
abstract = "Two studies were conducted to examine the use of behavioral cues to identify deception within structured interviews. In Study 1, participants engaged in mock interviews in which they were instructed to lie on specific questions that varied by person. Trained coders evaluated the presence and extent of deception cues in each videotaped response. Nine cues predicted responses as expected, demonstrating that, with careful scrutiny, it is possible to detect deception. In Study 2, participants, either informed or uninformed regarding deception cues, viewed five interviews and evaluated responses as being honest or deceptive. Participants also rated overall interview performance. Participants were unable to accurately distinguish lies from truths. Nevertheless, performance ratings differed on the basis of rater perceptions of truthfulness.",
author = "Culbertson, {Satoris S.} and Weyhrauch, {William S.} and Waples, {Christopher J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijsa.12135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "119--131",
journal = "International Journal of Selection and Assessment",
issn = "0965-075X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral Cues as Indicators of Deception in Structured Employment Interviews

AU - Culbertson, Satoris S.

AU - Weyhrauch, William S.

AU - Waples, Christopher J.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Two studies were conducted to examine the use of behavioral cues to identify deception within structured interviews. In Study 1, participants engaged in mock interviews in which they were instructed to lie on specific questions that varied by person. Trained coders evaluated the presence and extent of deception cues in each videotaped response. Nine cues predicted responses as expected, demonstrating that, with careful scrutiny, it is possible to detect deception. In Study 2, participants, either informed or uninformed regarding deception cues, viewed five interviews and evaluated responses as being honest or deceptive. Participants also rated overall interview performance. Participants were unable to accurately distinguish lies from truths. Nevertheless, performance ratings differed on the basis of rater perceptions of truthfulness.

AB - Two studies were conducted to examine the use of behavioral cues to identify deception within structured interviews. In Study 1, participants engaged in mock interviews in which they were instructed to lie on specific questions that varied by person. Trained coders evaluated the presence and extent of deception cues in each videotaped response. Nine cues predicted responses as expected, demonstrating that, with careful scrutiny, it is possible to detect deception. In Study 2, participants, either informed or uninformed regarding deception cues, viewed five interviews and evaluated responses as being honest or deceptive. Participants also rated overall interview performance. Participants were unable to accurately distinguish lies from truths. Nevertheless, performance ratings differed on the basis of rater perceptions of truthfulness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964911432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964911432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijsa.12135

DO - 10.1111/ijsa.12135

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964911432

VL - 24

SP - 119

EP - 131

JO - International Journal of Selection and Assessment

JF - International Journal of Selection and Assessment

SN - 0965-075X

IS - 2

ER -