Barriers to electronic prescribing: Nebraska pharmacists' perspective

Lina Lander, Donald G Klepser, Gary L Cochran, Daniel E. Lomelin, Marsha E Morien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and its accompanying clinical decision support capabilities have been promoted as means for reducing medication errors and improving efficiency. The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to adoption of e-prescribing among nonparticipating Nebraska pharmacies and to describe how the lack of pharmacy participation impacts the ability of physicians to meet meaningful use criteria. Methods: We interviewed pharmacists and/or managers from nonparticipating pharmacies to determine barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing. We used open-ended questions and a structured questionnaire to capture participants' responses. Findings: Of the 23 participants, 10 (43%) reported plans to implement e-prescribing sometime in the future but delayed participation due to transaction fees and maintenance costs, as well as lack of demand from customers and prescribers to implement e-prescribing. Nine participants (39%) reported no intention to e-prescribe in the future, citing start-up costs for implementing e-prescribing, transaction fees and maintenance costs, happiness with the current system, and lack of understanding about e-prescribing's benefits and how to implement e-prescribing. Conclusions: The barriers to e-prescribing identified by both late adopters and those not willing to accept e-prescriptions were similar and were mainly initial costs and transaction fees associated with each new prescription. For some rural pharmacies, not participating in e-prescribing may be a rational business decision. To increase participation, waiving or reimbursing transaction fees, based on demographic or financial characteristics of the pharmacy, may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic Prescribing
Pharmacists
Fees and Charges
Pharmacies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Prescriptions
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Maintenance
Medication Errors
Happiness
Aptitude
Demography

Keywords

  • Barriers
  • E-prescribing
  • Health information exchange
  • Nebraska
  • Pharmacist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Barriers to electronic prescribing : Nebraska pharmacists' perspective. / Lander, Lina; Klepser, Donald G; Cochran, Gary L; Lomelin, Daniel E.; Morien, Marsha E.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.12.2013, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lander, Lina ; Klepser, Donald G ; Cochran, Gary L ; Lomelin, Daniel E. ; Morien, Marsha E. / Barriers to electronic prescribing : Nebraska pharmacists' perspective. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 119-124.
@article{e1a96229bb384299b14e150eae4e1d24,
title = "Barriers to electronic prescribing: Nebraska pharmacists' perspective",
abstract = "Purpose: Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and its accompanying clinical decision support capabilities have been promoted as means for reducing medication errors and improving efficiency. The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to adoption of e-prescribing among nonparticipating Nebraska pharmacies and to describe how the lack of pharmacy participation impacts the ability of physicians to meet meaningful use criteria. Methods: We interviewed pharmacists and/or managers from nonparticipating pharmacies to determine barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing. We used open-ended questions and a structured questionnaire to capture participants' responses. Findings: Of the 23 participants, 10 (43{\%}) reported plans to implement e-prescribing sometime in the future but delayed participation due to transaction fees and maintenance costs, as well as lack of demand from customers and prescribers to implement e-prescribing. Nine participants (39{\%}) reported no intention to e-prescribe in the future, citing start-up costs for implementing e-prescribing, transaction fees and maintenance costs, happiness with the current system, and lack of understanding about e-prescribing's benefits and how to implement e-prescribing. Conclusions: The barriers to e-prescribing identified by both late adopters and those not willing to accept e-prescriptions were similar and were mainly initial costs and transaction fees associated with each new prescription. For some rural pharmacies, not participating in e-prescribing may be a rational business decision. To increase participation, waiving or reimbursing transaction fees, based on demographic or financial characteristics of the pharmacy, may be warranted.",
keywords = "Barriers, E-prescribing, Health information exchange, Nebraska, Pharmacist",
author = "Lina Lander and Klepser, {Donald G} and Cochran, {Gary L} and Lomelin, {Daniel E.} and Morien, {Marsha E}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00438.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to electronic prescribing

T2 - Nebraska pharmacists' perspective

AU - Lander, Lina

AU - Klepser, Donald G

AU - Cochran, Gary L

AU - Lomelin, Daniel E.

AU - Morien, Marsha E

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Purpose: Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and its accompanying clinical decision support capabilities have been promoted as means for reducing medication errors and improving efficiency. The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to adoption of e-prescribing among nonparticipating Nebraska pharmacies and to describe how the lack of pharmacy participation impacts the ability of physicians to meet meaningful use criteria. Methods: We interviewed pharmacists and/or managers from nonparticipating pharmacies to determine barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing. We used open-ended questions and a structured questionnaire to capture participants' responses. Findings: Of the 23 participants, 10 (43%) reported plans to implement e-prescribing sometime in the future but delayed participation due to transaction fees and maintenance costs, as well as lack of demand from customers and prescribers to implement e-prescribing. Nine participants (39%) reported no intention to e-prescribe in the future, citing start-up costs for implementing e-prescribing, transaction fees and maintenance costs, happiness with the current system, and lack of understanding about e-prescribing's benefits and how to implement e-prescribing. Conclusions: The barriers to e-prescribing identified by both late adopters and those not willing to accept e-prescriptions were similar and were mainly initial costs and transaction fees associated with each new prescription. For some rural pharmacies, not participating in e-prescribing may be a rational business decision. To increase participation, waiving or reimbursing transaction fees, based on demographic or financial characteristics of the pharmacy, may be warranted.

AB - Purpose: Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and its accompanying clinical decision support capabilities have been promoted as means for reducing medication errors and improving efficiency. The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to adoption of e-prescribing among nonparticipating Nebraska pharmacies and to describe how the lack of pharmacy participation impacts the ability of physicians to meet meaningful use criteria. Methods: We interviewed pharmacists and/or managers from nonparticipating pharmacies to determine barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing. We used open-ended questions and a structured questionnaire to capture participants' responses. Findings: Of the 23 participants, 10 (43%) reported plans to implement e-prescribing sometime in the future but delayed participation due to transaction fees and maintenance costs, as well as lack of demand from customers and prescribers to implement e-prescribing. Nine participants (39%) reported no intention to e-prescribe in the future, citing start-up costs for implementing e-prescribing, transaction fees and maintenance costs, happiness with the current system, and lack of understanding about e-prescribing's benefits and how to implement e-prescribing. Conclusions: The barriers to e-prescribing identified by both late adopters and those not willing to accept e-prescriptions were similar and were mainly initial costs and transaction fees associated with each new prescription. For some rural pharmacies, not participating in e-prescribing may be a rational business decision. To increase participation, waiving or reimbursing transaction fees, based on demographic or financial characteristics of the pharmacy, may be warranted.

KW - Barriers

KW - E-prescribing

KW - Health information exchange

KW - Nebraska

KW - Pharmacist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872000041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872000041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00438.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00438.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23289663

AN - SCOPUS:84872000041

VL - 29

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 1

ER -