Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days

Daniel E. Hall, Shipra Arya, Kendra K Schmid, Mark Alan Carlson, Pierre Lavedan, Travis L. Bailey, Georgia Purviance, Tammy Bockman, Thomas G. Lynch, Jason M Johanning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. INTERVENTIONS Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, 21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. RESULTS From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1%]; and white, 7096 [79.8%]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6%(84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7%(26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2% [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8% [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2%[60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3%[10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). Themagnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9%[47 of 197 patients] to 7.7%[30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5%[68 of 197 patients] to 11.7%[36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95%CI, 1.98-4.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-240
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume152
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Survival
Mortality
Veterans
Critical Care
Quality Improvement
Palliative Care
Anesthesia
Odds Ratio
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. / Hall, Daniel E.; Arya, Shipra; Schmid, Kendra K; Carlson, Mark Alan; Lavedan, Pierre; Bailey, Travis L.; Purviance, Georgia; Bockman, Tammy; Lynch, Thomas G.; Johanning, Jason M.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 152, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 233-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hall, Daniel E. ; Arya, Shipra ; Schmid, Kendra K ; Carlson, Mark Alan ; Lavedan, Pierre ; Bailey, Travis L. ; Purviance, Georgia ; Bockman, Tammy ; Lynch, Thomas G. ; Johanning, Jason M. / Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. In: JAMA Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 152, No. 3. pp. 233-240.
@article{6a359f4f776943b595dd67b908e4c8a7,
title = "Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. INTERVENTIONS Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, 21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. RESULTS From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1{\%}]; and white, 7096 [79.8{\%}]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6{\%}(84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7{\%}(26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2{\%} [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8{\%} [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2{\%}[60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3{\%}[10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). Themagnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9{\%}[47 of 197 patients] to 7.7{\%}[30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5{\%}[68 of 197 patients] to 11.7{\%}[36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95{\%}CI, 1.98-4.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.",
author = "Hall, {Daniel E.} and Shipra Arya and Schmid, {Kendra K} and Carlson, {Mark Alan} and Pierre Lavedan and Bailey, {Travis L.} and Georgia Purviance and Tammy Bockman and Lynch, {Thomas G.} and Johanning, {Jason M}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "233--240",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days

AU - Hall, Daniel E.

AU - Arya, Shipra

AU - Schmid, Kendra K

AU - Carlson, Mark Alan

AU - Lavedan, Pierre

AU - Bailey, Travis L.

AU - Purviance, Georgia

AU - Bockman, Tammy

AU - Lynch, Thomas G.

AU - Johanning, Jason M

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. INTERVENTIONS Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, 21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. RESULTS From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1%]; and white, 7096 [79.8%]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6%(84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7%(26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2% [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8% [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2%[60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3%[10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). Themagnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9%[47 of 197 patients] to 7.7%[30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5%[68 of 197 patients] to 11.7%[36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95%CI, 1.98-4.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.

AB - IMPORTANCE As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. INTERVENTIONS Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, 21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. RESULTS From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1%]; and white, 7096 [79.8%]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6%(84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7%(26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2% [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8% [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2%[60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3%[10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). Themagnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9%[47 of 197 patients] to 7.7%[30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5%[68 of 197 patients] to 11.7%[36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95%CI, 1.98-4.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014744166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014744166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 233

EP - 240

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 3

ER -