Assimilation and contrast in motion perception

Explorations in cooperativity

Mark Nawrot, Robert Sekuler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motions within one region of the field influence motion seen elsewhere. To explore this phenomenon we used cinematograms comprised of alternating strips within which dots (i) tended to move in one direction, or (ii) moved in random directions (dynamic noise). When alternating strips were narrow, motion in one direction induced a similar direction of illusory motion in the adjoining dynamic noise (assimilation); when alternating strips were wide, motion tended to induce an illusory opposed motion in the dynamic noise (contrast). Since this illusory motion exhibits hysteresis, it probably results from spatially distributed, cooperative processes. The shift from assimilation to contrast, as the cinematogram's strips increase in size, suggests that facilitatory and inhibitory influences of the network extend over different distances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1439-1451
Number of pages13
JournalVision Research
Volume30
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Motion Perception
Noise
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Motion perception Induced motion Cooperativity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Assimilation and contrast in motion perception : Explorations in cooperativity. / Nawrot, Mark; Sekuler, Robert.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 30, No. 10, 01.01.1990, p. 1439-1451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{daf576f158b84960ba309c732071560e,
title = "Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: Explorations in cooperativity",
abstract = "Motions within one region of the field influence motion seen elsewhere. To explore this phenomenon we used cinematograms comprised of alternating strips within which dots (i) tended to move in one direction, or (ii) moved in random directions (dynamic noise). When alternating strips were narrow, motion in one direction induced a similar direction of illusory motion in the adjoining dynamic noise (assimilation); when alternating strips were wide, motion tended to induce an illusory opposed motion in the dynamic noise (contrast). Since this illusory motion exhibits hysteresis, it probably results from spatially distributed, cooperative processes. The shift from assimilation to contrast, as the cinematogram's strips increase in size, suggests that facilitatory and inhibitory influences of the network extend over different distances.",
keywords = "Motion perception Induced motion Cooperativity",
author = "Mark Nawrot and Robert Sekuler",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(90)90025-G",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1439--1451",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assimilation and contrast in motion perception

T2 - Explorations in cooperativity

AU - Nawrot, Mark

AU - Sekuler, Robert

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Motions within one region of the field influence motion seen elsewhere. To explore this phenomenon we used cinematograms comprised of alternating strips within which dots (i) tended to move in one direction, or (ii) moved in random directions (dynamic noise). When alternating strips were narrow, motion in one direction induced a similar direction of illusory motion in the adjoining dynamic noise (assimilation); when alternating strips were wide, motion tended to induce an illusory opposed motion in the dynamic noise (contrast). Since this illusory motion exhibits hysteresis, it probably results from spatially distributed, cooperative processes. The shift from assimilation to contrast, as the cinematogram's strips increase in size, suggests that facilitatory and inhibitory influences of the network extend over different distances.

AB - Motions within one region of the field influence motion seen elsewhere. To explore this phenomenon we used cinematograms comprised of alternating strips within which dots (i) tended to move in one direction, or (ii) moved in random directions (dynamic noise). When alternating strips were narrow, motion in one direction induced a similar direction of illusory motion in the adjoining dynamic noise (assimilation); when alternating strips were wide, motion tended to induce an illusory opposed motion in the dynamic noise (contrast). Since this illusory motion exhibits hysteresis, it probably results from spatially distributed, cooperative processes. The shift from assimilation to contrast, as the cinematogram's strips increase in size, suggests that facilitatory and inhibitory influences of the network extend over different distances.

KW - Motion perception Induced motion Cooperativity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025024871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025024871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90025-G

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90025-G

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1439

EP - 1451

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 10

ER -