Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)

Clinical decisions of AAC specialists

Shelley K. Lund, Wendy Quach, Kristy SE Weissling, Miechelle McKelvey, Aimee Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who are augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) specialists approach the assessment process for 2 case studies, 1 child with cerebral palsy and 1 with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of the study was to answer the following questions: (a) How do clinicians with expertise approach the AAC assessment process for children with developmental disabilities? (b) Can any initial hypothesis be drawn about how SLPs approach the assessment of children with motor versus social interactive deficits? Method: This study used a phenomenological qualitative design. The researchers conducted 2 in-depth, semistructured interviews with 8 SLPs who specialized in AAC and selfidentified as primarily working with children. Results: Four major themes emerged from the data: area of assessment, method of assessment, evaluation preparation, and parent education. Each major theme contained multiple subthemes and categories within those subthemes. Conclusions: Participants discussed similar areas of assessment for both cases, indicating that some aspects of AAC assessment are universal. However, the specific aspects of what they were assessing and how they went about assessing them differed between the 2 cases. The results of the current study provide an outline of an assessment protocol for children with complex communication needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-68
Number of pages13
JournalLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Communication
communication
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Language
Developmental Disabilities
Disabled Children
Cerebral Palsy
language
parent education
Research Personnel
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Interviews
Education
autism
deficit
expertise
disability
Pathologists
Speech-language Pathologists
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) : Clinical decisions of AAC specialists. / Lund, Shelley K.; Quach, Wendy; Weissling, Kristy SE; McKelvey, Miechelle; Dietz, Aimee.

In: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 56-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da66326528c240d796ea6bd0fcc658df,
title = "Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Clinical decisions of AAC specialists",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who are augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) specialists approach the assessment process for 2 case studies, 1 child with cerebral palsy and 1 with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of the study was to answer the following questions: (a) How do clinicians with expertise approach the AAC assessment process for children with developmental disabilities? (b) Can any initial hypothesis be drawn about how SLPs approach the assessment of children with motor versus social interactive deficits? Method: This study used a phenomenological qualitative design. The researchers conducted 2 in-depth, semistructured interviews with 8 SLPs who specialized in AAC and selfidentified as primarily working with children. Results: Four major themes emerged from the data: area of assessment, method of assessment, evaluation preparation, and parent education. Each major theme contained multiple subthemes and categories within those subthemes. Conclusions: Participants discussed similar areas of assessment for both cases, indicating that some aspects of AAC assessment are universal. However, the specific aspects of what they were assessing and how they went about assessing them differed between the 2 cases. The results of the current study provide an outline of an assessment protocol for children with complex communication needs.",
author = "Lund, {Shelley K.} and Wendy Quach and Weissling, {Kristy SE} and Miechelle McKelvey and Aimee Dietz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0086",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "56--68",
journal = "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools",
issn = "0161-1461",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)

T2 - Clinical decisions of AAC specialists

AU - Lund, Shelley K.

AU - Quach, Wendy

AU - Weissling, Kristy SE

AU - McKelvey, Miechelle

AU - Dietz, Aimee

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who are augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) specialists approach the assessment process for 2 case studies, 1 child with cerebral palsy and 1 with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of the study was to answer the following questions: (a) How do clinicians with expertise approach the AAC assessment process for children with developmental disabilities? (b) Can any initial hypothesis be drawn about how SLPs approach the assessment of children with motor versus social interactive deficits? Method: This study used a phenomenological qualitative design. The researchers conducted 2 in-depth, semistructured interviews with 8 SLPs who specialized in AAC and selfidentified as primarily working with children. Results: Four major themes emerged from the data: area of assessment, method of assessment, evaluation preparation, and parent education. Each major theme contained multiple subthemes and categories within those subthemes. Conclusions: Participants discussed similar areas of assessment for both cases, indicating that some aspects of AAC assessment are universal. However, the specific aspects of what they were assessing and how they went about assessing them differed between the 2 cases. The results of the current study provide an outline of an assessment protocol for children with complex communication needs.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who are augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) specialists approach the assessment process for 2 case studies, 1 child with cerebral palsy and 1 with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of the study was to answer the following questions: (a) How do clinicians with expertise approach the AAC assessment process for children with developmental disabilities? (b) Can any initial hypothesis be drawn about how SLPs approach the assessment of children with motor versus social interactive deficits? Method: This study used a phenomenological qualitative design. The researchers conducted 2 in-depth, semistructured interviews with 8 SLPs who specialized in AAC and selfidentified as primarily working with children. Results: Four major themes emerged from the data: area of assessment, method of assessment, evaluation preparation, and parent education. Each major theme contained multiple subthemes and categories within those subthemes. Conclusions: Participants discussed similar areas of assessment for both cases, indicating that some aspects of AAC assessment are universal. However, the specific aspects of what they were assessing and how they went about assessing them differed between the 2 cases. The results of the current study provide an outline of an assessment protocol for children with complex communication needs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011031780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011031780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0086

DO - 10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0086

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 56

EP - 68

JO - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

JF - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

SN - 0161-1461

IS - 1

ER -