Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers

Lynn G. Bowman, Cathleen C. Piazza, Wayne W. Fisher, Louis P. Hagopian, Jeffrey S. Kogan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One method that has been demonstrated to improve the effectiveness of reinforcement is stimulus (reinforcer) variation (Egel, 1980). Egel found that bar pressing increased and responding occurred more rapidly during varied reinforcement than during constant reinforcement when identical stimuli were used across phases for 10 individuals with autism. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess the preferences of 7 individuals for varied presentation of slightly lower quality stimuli relative to constant access to the highest quality stimulus. Varied presentation was preferred over constant reinforcer presentation with 4 participants, and the opposite was true for 2 participants. One participant did not demonstrate a preference. These results suggest that stimulus variation may allow less preferred reinforcers to compete effectively with a more highly preferred reinforcer for some individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-458
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

stimulus
reinforcement
Autistic Disorder
autism
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Stimulus
Reinforcement

Keywords

  • Concurrent operants
  • Paired choice
  • Reinforcer assessment
  • Stimulus variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers. / Bowman, Lynn G.; Piazza, Cathleen C.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Hagopian, Louis P.; Kogan, Jeffrey S.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 451-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowman, Lynn G. ; Piazza, Cathleen C. ; Fisher, Wayne W. ; Hagopian, Louis P. ; Kogan, Jeffrey S. / Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 1997 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 451-458.
@article{26cd0a1526014a329008ef0d2da77b63,
title = "Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers",
abstract = "One method that has been demonstrated to improve the effectiveness of reinforcement is stimulus (reinforcer) variation (Egel, 1980). Egel found that bar pressing increased and responding occurred more rapidly during varied reinforcement than during constant reinforcement when identical stimuli were used across phases for 10 individuals with autism. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess the preferences of 7 individuals for varied presentation of slightly lower quality stimuli relative to constant access to the highest quality stimulus. Varied presentation was preferred over constant reinforcer presentation with 4 participants, and the opposite was true for 2 participants. One participant did not demonstrate a preference. These results suggest that stimulus variation may allow less preferred reinforcers to compete effectively with a more highly preferred reinforcer for some individuals.",
keywords = "Concurrent operants, Paired choice, Reinforcer assessment, Stimulus variation",
author = "Bowman, {Lynn G.} and Piazza, {Cathleen C.} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Hagopian, {Louis P.} and Kogan, {Jeffrey S.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1997.30-451",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "451--458",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers

AU - Bowman, Lynn G.

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Hagopian, Louis P.

AU - Kogan, Jeffrey S.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - One method that has been demonstrated to improve the effectiveness of reinforcement is stimulus (reinforcer) variation (Egel, 1980). Egel found that bar pressing increased and responding occurred more rapidly during varied reinforcement than during constant reinforcement when identical stimuli were used across phases for 10 individuals with autism. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess the preferences of 7 individuals for varied presentation of slightly lower quality stimuli relative to constant access to the highest quality stimulus. Varied presentation was preferred over constant reinforcer presentation with 4 participants, and the opposite was true for 2 participants. One participant did not demonstrate a preference. These results suggest that stimulus variation may allow less preferred reinforcers to compete effectively with a more highly preferred reinforcer for some individuals.

AB - One method that has been demonstrated to improve the effectiveness of reinforcement is stimulus (reinforcer) variation (Egel, 1980). Egel found that bar pressing increased and responding occurred more rapidly during varied reinforcement than during constant reinforcement when identical stimuli were used across phases for 10 individuals with autism. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess the preferences of 7 individuals for varied presentation of slightly lower quality stimuli relative to constant access to the highest quality stimulus. Varied presentation was preferred over constant reinforcer presentation with 4 participants, and the opposite was true for 2 participants. One participant did not demonstrate a preference. These results suggest that stimulus variation may allow less preferred reinforcers to compete effectively with a more highly preferred reinforcer for some individuals.

KW - Concurrent operants

KW - Paired choice

KW - Reinforcer assessment

KW - Stimulus variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031225705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031225705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-451

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-451

M3 - Article

C2 - 9316258

AN - SCOPUS:0031225705

VL - 30

SP - 451

EP - 458

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -