Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation

Wayne W Fisher, Steven E. Lindauer, Cindy J. Alterson, Rachel H. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy. In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy. In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)513-527
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Play and Playthings
toy
manipulation
experiment
Therapeutics
Acoustic Stimulation
Toys
Manipulation
Intellectual Disability
Plastics
Destruction
Experiment
present

Keywords

  • Automatic reinforcement
  • Functional analysis
  • Property destruction
  • Stereotypy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation. / Fisher, Wayne W; Lindauer, Steven E.; Alterson, Cindy J.; Thompson, Rachel H.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 513-527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fisher, Wayne W ; Lindauer, Steven E. ; Alterson, Cindy J. ; Thompson, Rachel H. / Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 1998 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 513-527.
@article{34c3cb8d5ed44eb48215fc2e470f1d3a,
title = "Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation",
abstract = "In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy. In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy. In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.",
keywords = "Automatic reinforcement, Functional analysis, Property destruction, Stereotypy",
author = "Fisher, {Wayne W} and Lindauer, {Steven E.} and Alterson, {Cindy J.} and Thompson, {Rachel H.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "513--527",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation

AU - Fisher, Wayne W

AU - Lindauer, Steven E.

AU - Alterson, Cindy J.

AU - Thompson, Rachel H.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy. In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy. In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.

AB - In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy. In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy. In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.

KW - Automatic reinforcement

KW - Functional analysis

KW - Property destruction

KW - Stereotypy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032246457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032246457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 513

EP - 527

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 4

ER -