Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD: Overview of methodological issues

Vishal Madaan, Joan Daughton, Brian Lubberstedt, Andy Mattai, Brigette S. Vaughan, Christopher J Kratochvil

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and impairing psychiatric condition that affects significant numbers of children, adolescents and adults. Clinicians in a variety of practice settings (hospital, outpatient, residential, research) strive to diagnose, treat and monitor ADHD in an efficient and evidence-based manner. Tools that facilitate the gathering and interpretation of information from a variety of sources can effectively augment a diagnostic assessment, and can also be useful for longitudinal monitoring. Multiple assessment tools are available, with varying degrees of psychometric validity, clinical utility and overall feasibility (time and cost). This review provides an overview of several available ADHD rating scales and continuous performance tests, and offers a discussion of potential strengths and weaknesses of the instruments. While these tools do not in and of themselves make a diagnosis of ADHD, they can certainly assist in the diagnostic assessment, be crucial in assessing the efficacy of medications in clinical trials, and be a useful adjunct in the clinical management of ADHD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-290
Number of pages16
JournalCNS Drugs
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 17 2008

Fingerprint

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Psychometrics
Psychiatry
Outpatients
Clinical Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, assessment
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD : Overview of methodological issues. / Madaan, Vishal; Daughton, Joan; Lubberstedt, Brian; Mattai, Andy; Vaughan, Brigette S.; Kratochvil, Christopher J.

In: CNS Drugs, Vol. 22, No. 4, 17.03.2008, p. 275-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Madaan, V, Daughton, J, Lubberstedt, B, Mattai, A, Vaughan, BS & Kratochvil, CJ 2008, 'Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD: Overview of methodological issues', CNS Drugs, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 275-290. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200822040-00002
Madaan, Vishal ; Daughton, Joan ; Lubberstedt, Brian ; Mattai, Andy ; Vaughan, Brigette S. ; Kratochvil, Christopher J. / Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD : Overview of methodological issues. In: CNS Drugs. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 275-290.
@article{b0f1e700134144aaafc4817b2878920d,
title = "Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD: Overview of methodological issues",
abstract = "Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and impairing psychiatric condition that affects significant numbers of children, adolescents and adults. Clinicians in a variety of practice settings (hospital, outpatient, residential, research) strive to diagnose, treat and monitor ADHD in an efficient and evidence-based manner. Tools that facilitate the gathering and interpretation of information from a variety of sources can effectively augment a diagnostic assessment, and can also be useful for longitudinal monitoring. Multiple assessment tools are available, with varying degrees of psychometric validity, clinical utility and overall feasibility (time and cost). This review provides an overview of several available ADHD rating scales and continuous performance tests, and offers a discussion of potential strengths and weaknesses of the instruments. While these tools do not in and of themselves make a diagnosis of ADHD, they can certainly assist in the diagnostic assessment, be crucial in assessing the efficacy of medications in clinical trials, and be a useful adjunct in the clinical management of ADHD.",
keywords = "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, assessment, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment",
author = "Vishal Madaan and Joan Daughton and Brian Lubberstedt and Andy Mattai and Vaughan, {Brigette S.} and Kratochvil, {Christopher J}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.2165/00023210-200822040-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "275--290",
journal = "CNS Drugs",
issn = "1172-7047",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the efficacy of treatments for ADHD

T2 - Overview of methodological issues

AU - Madaan, Vishal

AU - Daughton, Joan

AU - Lubberstedt, Brian

AU - Mattai, Andy

AU - Vaughan, Brigette S.

AU - Kratochvil, Christopher J

PY - 2008/3/17

Y1 - 2008/3/17

N2 - Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and impairing psychiatric condition that affects significant numbers of children, adolescents and adults. Clinicians in a variety of practice settings (hospital, outpatient, residential, research) strive to diagnose, treat and monitor ADHD in an efficient and evidence-based manner. Tools that facilitate the gathering and interpretation of information from a variety of sources can effectively augment a diagnostic assessment, and can also be useful for longitudinal monitoring. Multiple assessment tools are available, with varying degrees of psychometric validity, clinical utility and overall feasibility (time and cost). This review provides an overview of several available ADHD rating scales and continuous performance tests, and offers a discussion of potential strengths and weaknesses of the instruments. While these tools do not in and of themselves make a diagnosis of ADHD, they can certainly assist in the diagnostic assessment, be crucial in assessing the efficacy of medications in clinical trials, and be a useful adjunct in the clinical management of ADHD.

AB - Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and impairing psychiatric condition that affects significant numbers of children, adolescents and adults. Clinicians in a variety of practice settings (hospital, outpatient, residential, research) strive to diagnose, treat and monitor ADHD in an efficient and evidence-based manner. Tools that facilitate the gathering and interpretation of information from a variety of sources can effectively augment a diagnostic assessment, and can also be useful for longitudinal monitoring. Multiple assessment tools are available, with varying degrees of psychometric validity, clinical utility and overall feasibility (time and cost). This review provides an overview of several available ADHD rating scales and continuous performance tests, and offers a discussion of potential strengths and weaknesses of the instruments. While these tools do not in and of themselves make a diagnosis of ADHD, they can certainly assist in the diagnostic assessment, be crucial in assessing the efficacy of medications in clinical trials, and be a useful adjunct in the clinical management of ADHD.

KW - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, assessment

KW - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40549144048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40549144048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2165/00023210-200822040-00002

DO - 10.2165/00023210-200822040-00002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18336058

AN - SCOPUS:40549144048

VL - 22

SP - 275

EP - 290

JO - CNS Drugs

JF - CNS Drugs

SN - 1172-7047

IS - 4

ER -