Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments

Natasha Elkovitch, Jodi L. Viljoen, Mario J Scalora, Daniel Ullman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As courts often rely on clinicians when differentiating between sexually abusive youth at a low versus high risk of reoffense, understanding factors that contribute to accuracy in assessment of risk is imperative. The present study built on existing research by examining (1) the accuracy of clinical judgments of risk made after completing risk assessment instruments, (2) whether instrument-informed clinical judgments made with a high degree of confidence are associated with greater accuracy, and (3) the risk assessment instruments and subscales most predictive of clinical judgments. Raters assessed each youth's (n = 166) risk of reoffending after completing the SAVRY and J-SOAP-II. Raters were not able to predict detected cases of either sexual recidivism or nonsexual violent recidivism above chance, and a high degree of rater confidence was not associated with higher levels of accuracy. Total scores on the J-SOAP-II were predictive of instrument-informed clinical judgments of sexual risk, and total scores on the SAVRY of nonsexual risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-528
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2008

Fingerprint

sexual offense
risk assessment
adolescent
confidence
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense : The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments. / Elkovitch, Natasha; Viljoen, Jodi L.; Scalora, Mario J; Ullman, Daniel.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 26, No. 4, 15.09.2008, p. 511-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d685c9880774d2abec2d6aae7fdf554,
title = "Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments",
abstract = "As courts often rely on clinicians when differentiating between sexually abusive youth at a low versus high risk of reoffense, understanding factors that contribute to accuracy in assessment of risk is imperative. The present study built on existing research by examining (1) the accuracy of clinical judgments of risk made after completing risk assessment instruments, (2) whether instrument-informed clinical judgments made with a high degree of confidence are associated with greater accuracy, and (3) the risk assessment instruments and subscales most predictive of clinical judgments. Raters assessed each youth's (n = 166) risk of reoffending after completing the SAVRY and J-SOAP-II. Raters were not able to predict detected cases of either sexual recidivism or nonsexual violent recidivism above chance, and a high degree of rater confidence was not associated with higher levels of accuracy. Total scores on the J-SOAP-II were predictive of instrument-informed clinical judgments of sexual risk, and total scores on the SAVRY of nonsexual risk.",
author = "Natasha Elkovitch and Viljoen, {Jodi L.} and Scalora, {Mario J} and Daniel Ullman",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "511--528",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense

T2 - The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments

AU - Elkovitch, Natasha

AU - Viljoen, Jodi L.

AU - Scalora, Mario J

AU - Ullman, Daniel

PY - 2008/9/15

Y1 - 2008/9/15

N2 - As courts often rely on clinicians when differentiating between sexually abusive youth at a low versus high risk of reoffense, understanding factors that contribute to accuracy in assessment of risk is imperative. The present study built on existing research by examining (1) the accuracy of clinical judgments of risk made after completing risk assessment instruments, (2) whether instrument-informed clinical judgments made with a high degree of confidence are associated with greater accuracy, and (3) the risk assessment instruments and subscales most predictive of clinical judgments. Raters assessed each youth's (n = 166) risk of reoffending after completing the SAVRY and J-SOAP-II. Raters were not able to predict detected cases of either sexual recidivism or nonsexual violent recidivism above chance, and a high degree of rater confidence was not associated with higher levels of accuracy. Total scores on the J-SOAP-II were predictive of instrument-informed clinical judgments of sexual risk, and total scores on the SAVRY of nonsexual risk.

AB - As courts often rely on clinicians when differentiating between sexually abusive youth at a low versus high risk of reoffense, understanding factors that contribute to accuracy in assessment of risk is imperative. The present study built on existing research by examining (1) the accuracy of clinical judgments of risk made after completing risk assessment instruments, (2) whether instrument-informed clinical judgments made with a high degree of confidence are associated with greater accuracy, and (3) the risk assessment instruments and subscales most predictive of clinical judgments. Raters assessed each youth's (n = 166) risk of reoffending after completing the SAVRY and J-SOAP-II. Raters were not able to predict detected cases of either sexual recidivism or nonsexual violent recidivism above chance, and a high degree of rater confidence was not associated with higher levels of accuracy. Total scores on the J-SOAP-II were predictive of instrument-informed clinical judgments of sexual risk, and total scores on the SAVRY of nonsexual risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51349165801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51349165801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.832

DO - 10.1002/bsl.832

M3 - Article

C2 - 18683205

AN - SCOPUS:51349165801

VL - 26

SP - 511

EP - 528

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 4

ER -