Article use in the spontaneous samples of children with specific language impairment

The importance of considering syntactic contexts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using spontaneous language samples from eight children with specific language impairment (SLI) and eight normally developing (ND) children matched to the SLI group on the basis of mean length of utterance, I calculated percentage use of articles in subject phrase contexts only, predicate phrase contexts only, and overall combined contexts. The SLI and ND groups showed highly similar profiles in article use. For both groups there were significant differences between use of articles in subject phrases and predicate phrases, which were obscured by determination of use in the combined contexts, though this is the more typically used procedure. Specifically, the children were less able to use articles in subject phrases. Furthermore, attempts at article use in subject phrases were less frequent, resulting in few obligatory contexts for subject articles in many samples. Some pairs of children showed equivalent mastery of articles in predicate contexts but diverged in their attempts to use articles in subject contexts. The member of the pair who attempted a greater number of articles in subject phrases showed the lower percentage of overall article use. Thus the overall percentage score was misleading in that children who were advanced enough to attempt subject article + noun constructions showed lower overall percentage use scores. To accurately describe children's abilities with the percentage use of articles score, more careful delineation of contexts is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-160
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Linguistics and Phonetics
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Language
language
Aptitude
Syntax
Specific Language Impairment
Group
ability

Keywords

  • Articles
  • Grammatical morphemes
  • Predicates
  • Specific language impairment
  • Subjects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{cb3e62e615bc46b7bd7f7ca0e26b0a68,
title = "Article use in the spontaneous samples of children with specific language impairment: The importance of considering syntactic contexts",
abstract = "Using spontaneous language samples from eight children with specific language impairment (SLI) and eight normally developing (ND) children matched to the SLI group on the basis of mean length of utterance, I calculated percentage use of articles in subject phrase contexts only, predicate phrase contexts only, and overall combined contexts. The SLI and ND groups showed highly similar profiles in article use. For both groups there were significant differences between use of articles in subject phrases and predicate phrases, which were obscured by determination of use in the combined contexts, though this is the more typically used procedure. Specifically, the children were less able to use articles in subject phrases. Furthermore, attempts at article use in subject phrases were less frequent, resulting in few obligatory contexts for subject articles in many samples. Some pairs of children showed equivalent mastery of articles in predicate contexts but diverged in their attempts to use articles in subject contexts. The member of the pair who attempted a greater number of articles in subject phrases showed the lower percentage of overall article use. Thus the overall percentage score was misleading in that children who were advanced enough to attempt subject article + noun constructions showed lower overall percentage use scores. To accurately describe children's abilities with the percentage use of articles score, more careful delineation of contexts is needed.",
keywords = "Articles, Grammatical morphemes, Predicates, Specific language impairment, Subjects",
author = "Karla McGregor",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/02699209408985303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "153--160",
journal = "Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Article use in the spontaneous samples of children with specific language impairment

T2 - The importance of considering syntactic contexts

AU - McGregor, Karla

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Using spontaneous language samples from eight children with specific language impairment (SLI) and eight normally developing (ND) children matched to the SLI group on the basis of mean length of utterance, I calculated percentage use of articles in subject phrase contexts only, predicate phrase contexts only, and overall combined contexts. The SLI and ND groups showed highly similar profiles in article use. For both groups there were significant differences between use of articles in subject phrases and predicate phrases, which were obscured by determination of use in the combined contexts, though this is the more typically used procedure. Specifically, the children were less able to use articles in subject phrases. Furthermore, attempts at article use in subject phrases were less frequent, resulting in few obligatory contexts for subject articles in many samples. Some pairs of children showed equivalent mastery of articles in predicate contexts but diverged in their attempts to use articles in subject contexts. The member of the pair who attempted a greater number of articles in subject phrases showed the lower percentage of overall article use. Thus the overall percentage score was misleading in that children who were advanced enough to attempt subject article + noun constructions showed lower overall percentage use scores. To accurately describe children's abilities with the percentage use of articles score, more careful delineation of contexts is needed.

AB - Using spontaneous language samples from eight children with specific language impairment (SLI) and eight normally developing (ND) children matched to the SLI group on the basis of mean length of utterance, I calculated percentage use of articles in subject phrase contexts only, predicate phrase contexts only, and overall combined contexts. The SLI and ND groups showed highly similar profiles in article use. For both groups there were significant differences between use of articles in subject phrases and predicate phrases, which were obscured by determination of use in the combined contexts, though this is the more typically used procedure. Specifically, the children were less able to use articles in subject phrases. Furthermore, attempts at article use in subject phrases were less frequent, resulting in few obligatory contexts for subject articles in many samples. Some pairs of children showed equivalent mastery of articles in predicate contexts but diverged in their attempts to use articles in subject contexts. The member of the pair who attempted a greater number of articles in subject phrases showed the lower percentage of overall article use. Thus the overall percentage score was misleading in that children who were advanced enough to attempt subject article + noun constructions showed lower overall percentage use scores. To accurately describe children's abilities with the percentage use of articles score, more careful delineation of contexts is needed.

KW - Articles

KW - Grammatical morphemes

KW - Predicates

KW - Specific language impairment

KW - Subjects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028331502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028331502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02699209408985303

DO - 10.3109/02699209408985303

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 153

EP - 160

JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

IS - 2

ER -