Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?

Vincenzo G. Roma, Debra A Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) has been understood as a dispositional tendency to view the presence of negative events as unacceptable and threatening, regardless of the likelihood of those events occurring. The preference over the 12-item vs. 27-item of the IUS has been central to debate. The goals of the present study were to evaluate two competing models of measuring IU with model-fitting analyses and explore model invariance of gender (e.g. men vs. women). A sample of 980 individuals completed an online IUS survey. Results indicated that the two-factor short-form model provided better fit to the data compared to the full-length two-factor model proposed by. Results also indicated that the short-form IUS is gender invariant, suggesting acceptable use among men and women. These findings provide further support of a two-factor structure and suggest that the IUS is appropriate for men and women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-338
Number of pages12
JournalCognitive Behaviour Therapy
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2017

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Intolerance of uncertainty
  • ambiguity
  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • worry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet? / Roma, Vincenzo G.; Hope, Debra A.

In: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.07.2017, p. 327-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb0b29c98b5b4959bbe0f717058040ee,
title = "Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?",
abstract = "Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) has been understood as a dispositional tendency to view the presence of negative events as unacceptable and threatening, regardless of the likelihood of those events occurring. The preference over the 12-item vs. 27-item of the IUS has been central to debate. The goals of the present study were to evaluate two competing models of measuring IU with model-fitting analyses and explore model invariance of gender (e.g. men vs. women). A sample of 980 individuals completed an online IUS survey. Results indicated that the two-factor short-form model provided better fit to the data compared to the full-length two-factor model proposed by. Results also indicated that the short-form IUS is gender invariant, suggesting acceptable use among men and women. These findings provide further support of a two-factor structure and suggest that the IUS is appropriate for men and women.",
keywords = "Intolerance of uncertainty, ambiguity, confirmatory factor analysis, worry",
author = "Roma, {Vincenzo G.} and Hope, {Debra A}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/16506073.2016.1252792",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "327--338",
journal = "Cognitive Behaviour Therapy",
issn = "1650-6073",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis AS",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?

AU - Roma, Vincenzo G.

AU - Hope, Debra A

PY - 2017/7/4

Y1 - 2017/7/4

N2 - Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) has been understood as a dispositional tendency to view the presence of negative events as unacceptable and threatening, regardless of the likelihood of those events occurring. The preference over the 12-item vs. 27-item of the IUS has been central to debate. The goals of the present study were to evaluate two competing models of measuring IU with model-fitting analyses and explore model invariance of gender (e.g. men vs. women). A sample of 980 individuals completed an online IUS survey. Results indicated that the two-factor short-form model provided better fit to the data compared to the full-length two-factor model proposed by. Results also indicated that the short-form IUS is gender invariant, suggesting acceptable use among men and women. These findings provide further support of a two-factor structure and suggest that the IUS is appropriate for men and women.

AB - Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) has been understood as a dispositional tendency to view the presence of negative events as unacceptable and threatening, regardless of the likelihood of those events occurring. The preference over the 12-item vs. 27-item of the IUS has been central to debate. The goals of the present study were to evaluate two competing models of measuring IU with model-fitting analyses and explore model invariance of gender (e.g. men vs. women). A sample of 980 individuals completed an online IUS survey. Results indicated that the two-factor short-form model provided better fit to the data compared to the full-length two-factor model proposed by. Results also indicated that the short-form IUS is gender invariant, suggesting acceptable use among men and women. These findings provide further support of a two-factor structure and suggest that the IUS is appropriate for men and women.

KW - Intolerance of uncertainty

KW - ambiguity

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - worry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996836505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996836505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16506073.2016.1252792

DO - 10.1080/16506073.2016.1252792

M3 - Article

C2 - 27876443

AN - SCOPUS:84996836505

VL - 46

SP - 327

EP - 338

JO - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

JF - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

SN - 1650-6073

IS - 4

ER -