Are Sex Offenders Different? An Examination of Rearrest Patterns

Lisa L. Sample, Timothy M. Bray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sex offender registration and community notification requirements are universally applied to all sex offenders irrespective of their type. In this way, these policies treat sex offenders as a homogenous group, assuming that they exhibit similar reoffending patterns regardless of the age of their victims or the nature of their crimes. In this article, the authors highlight the assumption of homogeneity underlying sex offender laws and reviewit in light of current empirical evidence. They also offer a case study of recidivism rates for sex offenders in Illinois. The authors find that sex offenders are not the homogenous group that our policies assume, and they discuss the implication of this finding for the application of sex offender laws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-102
Number of pages20
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

offender
examination
Law
Group
offense
community
evidence

Keywords

  • community
  • notification
  • recidivism
  • registration
  • sex offender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Are Sex Offenders Different? An Examination of Rearrest Patterns. / Sample, Lisa L.; Bray, Timothy M.

In: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 03.2006, p. 83-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{753e8931c1c746928e1dd481e7d0855d,
title = "Are Sex Offenders Different? An Examination of Rearrest Patterns",
abstract = "Sex offender registration and community notification requirements are universally applied to all sex offenders irrespective of their type. In this way, these policies treat sex offenders as a homogenous group, assuming that they exhibit similar reoffending patterns regardless of the age of their victims or the nature of their crimes. In this article, the authors highlight the assumption of homogeneity underlying sex offender laws and reviewit in light of current empirical evidence. They also offer a case study of recidivism rates for sex offenders in Illinois. The authors find that sex offenders are not the homogenous group that our policies assume, and they discuss the implication of this finding for the application of sex offender laws.",
keywords = "community, notification, recidivism, registration, sex offender",
author = "Sample, {Lisa L.} and Bray, {Timothy M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0887403405282916",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "83--102",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Sex Offenders Different? An Examination of Rearrest Patterns

AU - Sample, Lisa L.

AU - Bray, Timothy M.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Sex offender registration and community notification requirements are universally applied to all sex offenders irrespective of their type. In this way, these policies treat sex offenders as a homogenous group, assuming that they exhibit similar reoffending patterns regardless of the age of their victims or the nature of their crimes. In this article, the authors highlight the assumption of homogeneity underlying sex offender laws and reviewit in light of current empirical evidence. They also offer a case study of recidivism rates for sex offenders in Illinois. The authors find that sex offenders are not the homogenous group that our policies assume, and they discuss the implication of this finding for the application of sex offender laws.

AB - Sex offender registration and community notification requirements are universally applied to all sex offenders irrespective of their type. In this way, these policies treat sex offenders as a homogenous group, assuming that they exhibit similar reoffending patterns regardless of the age of their victims or the nature of their crimes. In this article, the authors highlight the assumption of homogeneity underlying sex offender laws and reviewit in light of current empirical evidence. They also offer a case study of recidivism rates for sex offenders in Illinois. The authors find that sex offenders are not the homogenous group that our policies assume, and they discuss the implication of this finding for the application of sex offender laws.

KW - community

KW - notification

KW - recidivism

KW - registration

KW - sex offender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992850890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992850890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0887403405282916

DO - 10.1177/0887403405282916

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992850890

VL - 17

SP - 83

EP - 102

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

IS - 1

ER -