Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species?

Daniela Leles, Scott L Gardner, Karl Reinhard, Alena Ĩiguez, Adauto Araujo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the original description and naming of Ascaris lumbricoides from humans by Linnaeus in 1758 and later of Ascaris suum from pigs by Goeze 1782, these species have been considered to be valid. Four hypotheses relative to the conspecificity or lack thereof (and thus origin of these species) are possible: 1) Ascaris lumbricoides (usually infecting humans) and Ascaris suum (recorded mostly from pigs) are both valid species, with the two species originating via a speciation event from a common ancestor sometime before the domestication of pigs by humans, or 2) Ascaris lumbricoides in humans is derived directly from the species A. suum found in pigs with A. suum then existing as a persistent ancestor after formation of A. lumbricoides, or 3) Ascaris suum is derived directly from A. lumbricoides with the persistent ancestor being A. lumbricoides and A. suum being the newly derived species, and finally, 4) Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are the same species, this hypothesis being supported by studies showing both low morphological and low genetic divergence at several genes. We present and discuss paleoparasitological and genetic evidence that complement new data to evaluate the origin and evolution of Ascaris spp. in humans and pigs, and the uniqueness of the species in both hosts. Finally, we conclude that Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are a single species and that the name A. lumbricoides Linnaeus 1758 has taxonomic priority; therefore A. suum Goeze 1782 should be considered a synonym of A. lumbricoides.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number42
JournalParasites and Vectors
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 21 2012

Fingerprint

Ascaris suum
Ascaris lumbricoides
Swine
Ascaris
Names

Keywords

  • Ascaris
  • coprolites
  • helminthiasis
  • host-parasite evolution
  • paleoparasitology
  • parasitism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species? / Leles, Daniela; Gardner, Scott L; Reinhard, Karl; Ĩiguez, Alena; Araujo, Adauto.

In: Parasites and Vectors, Vol. 5, No. 1, 42, 21.02.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Leles, Daniela ; Gardner, Scott L ; Reinhard, Karl ; Ĩiguez, Alena ; Araujo, Adauto. / Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species?. In: Parasites and Vectors. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
@article{f587fe15df844037b771073a32eb7339,
title = "Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species?",
abstract = "Since the original description and naming of Ascaris lumbricoides from humans by Linnaeus in 1758 and later of Ascaris suum from pigs by Goeze 1782, these species have been considered to be valid. Four hypotheses relative to the conspecificity or lack thereof (and thus origin of these species) are possible: 1) Ascaris lumbricoides (usually infecting humans) and Ascaris suum (recorded mostly from pigs) are both valid species, with the two species originating via a speciation event from a common ancestor sometime before the domestication of pigs by humans, or 2) Ascaris lumbricoides in humans is derived directly from the species A. suum found in pigs with A. suum then existing as a persistent ancestor after formation of A. lumbricoides, or 3) Ascaris suum is derived directly from A. lumbricoides with the persistent ancestor being A. lumbricoides and A. suum being the newly derived species, and finally, 4) Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are the same species, this hypothesis being supported by studies showing both low morphological and low genetic divergence at several genes. We present and discuss paleoparasitological and genetic evidence that complement new data to evaluate the origin and evolution of Ascaris spp. in humans and pigs, and the uniqueness of the species in both hosts. Finally, we conclude that Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are a single species and that the name A. lumbricoides Linnaeus 1758 has taxonomic priority; therefore A. suum Goeze 1782 should be considered a synonym of A. lumbricoides.",
keywords = "Ascaris, coprolites, helminthiasis, host-parasite evolution, paleoparasitology, parasitism",
author = "Daniela Leles and Gardner, {Scott L} and Karl Reinhard and Alena Ĩiguez and Adauto Araujo",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/1756-3305-5-42",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Parasites and Vectors",
issn = "1756-3305",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species?

AU - Leles, Daniela

AU - Gardner, Scott L

AU - Reinhard, Karl

AU - Ĩiguez, Alena

AU - Araujo, Adauto

PY - 2012/2/21

Y1 - 2012/2/21

N2 - Since the original description and naming of Ascaris lumbricoides from humans by Linnaeus in 1758 and later of Ascaris suum from pigs by Goeze 1782, these species have been considered to be valid. Four hypotheses relative to the conspecificity or lack thereof (and thus origin of these species) are possible: 1) Ascaris lumbricoides (usually infecting humans) and Ascaris suum (recorded mostly from pigs) are both valid species, with the two species originating via a speciation event from a common ancestor sometime before the domestication of pigs by humans, or 2) Ascaris lumbricoides in humans is derived directly from the species A. suum found in pigs with A. suum then existing as a persistent ancestor after formation of A. lumbricoides, or 3) Ascaris suum is derived directly from A. lumbricoides with the persistent ancestor being A. lumbricoides and A. suum being the newly derived species, and finally, 4) Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are the same species, this hypothesis being supported by studies showing both low morphological and low genetic divergence at several genes. We present and discuss paleoparasitological and genetic evidence that complement new data to evaluate the origin and evolution of Ascaris spp. in humans and pigs, and the uniqueness of the species in both hosts. Finally, we conclude that Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are a single species and that the name A. lumbricoides Linnaeus 1758 has taxonomic priority; therefore A. suum Goeze 1782 should be considered a synonym of A. lumbricoides.

AB - Since the original description and naming of Ascaris lumbricoides from humans by Linnaeus in 1758 and later of Ascaris suum from pigs by Goeze 1782, these species have been considered to be valid. Four hypotheses relative to the conspecificity or lack thereof (and thus origin of these species) are possible: 1) Ascaris lumbricoides (usually infecting humans) and Ascaris suum (recorded mostly from pigs) are both valid species, with the two species originating via a speciation event from a common ancestor sometime before the domestication of pigs by humans, or 2) Ascaris lumbricoides in humans is derived directly from the species A. suum found in pigs with A. suum then existing as a persistent ancestor after formation of A. lumbricoides, or 3) Ascaris suum is derived directly from A. lumbricoides with the persistent ancestor being A. lumbricoides and A. suum being the newly derived species, and finally, 4) Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are the same species, this hypothesis being supported by studies showing both low morphological and low genetic divergence at several genes. We present and discuss paleoparasitological and genetic evidence that complement new data to evaluate the origin and evolution of Ascaris spp. in humans and pigs, and the uniqueness of the species in both hosts. Finally, we conclude that Ascaris lumbricoides and A. suum are a single species and that the name A. lumbricoides Linnaeus 1758 has taxonomic priority; therefore A. suum Goeze 1782 should be considered a synonym of A. lumbricoides.

KW - Ascaris

KW - coprolites

KW - helminthiasis

KW - host-parasite evolution

KW - paleoparasitology

KW - parasitism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857125896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857125896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1756-3305-5-42

DO - 10.1186/1756-3305-5-42

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

JO - Parasites and Vectors

JF - Parasites and Vectors

SN - 1756-3305

IS - 1

M1 - 42

ER -