Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Early Adolescent Tobacco Chewing

Ruth Wenzl Gerber, Ian M. Newman, Gary L. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Beliefs and social norms elicited from adolescents were employed in the theory of reasoned action to predict early adolescent males' intention to chew tobacco. About 50% of males had chewed tobacco. Responses of chewing intenders and nonintenders differed in response direction and in response strength. Response differences regarding physical effects (cancer, yellow teeth, habit forming) as well as psychosocial effects (look cool, relax, have a good time with friends) suggested specific educational strategies. Intenders and nonintenders both reported not believing chewing causes cancer, an erroneous belief. Nonintenders reported belief carry over from smoking: chewing will “make my clothes smelly” and chewing will “give me shortness of breath,” both unfounded. Nonintenders reported less referent support for chewing. Both groups reported a general unwillingness to comply with their significant others. 1988 American School Health Association

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-413
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of School Health
Volume58
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1988

Fingerprint

Mastication
Tobacco Use
nicotine
cancer
adolescent
Social Norms
habits
smoking
Tobacco
cause
health
Clothing
School Health Services
school
Group
Dyspnea
Habits
Neoplasms
Tooth
Smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Philosophy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Early Adolescent Tobacco Chewing. / Gerber, Ruth Wenzl; Newman, Ian M.; Martin, Gary L.

In: Journal of School Health, Vol. 58, No. 10, 12.1988, p. 410-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gerber, Ruth Wenzl ; Newman, Ian M. ; Martin, Gary L. / Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Early Adolescent Tobacco Chewing. In: Journal of School Health. 1988 ; Vol. 58, No. 10. pp. 410-413.
@article{c45d7ad8cdd94e7f83e0445f0782071c,
title = "Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Early Adolescent Tobacco Chewing",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: Beliefs and social norms elicited from adolescents were employed in the theory of reasoned action to predict early adolescent males' intention to chew tobacco. About 50{\%} of males had chewed tobacco. Responses of chewing intenders and nonintenders differed in response direction and in response strength. Response differences regarding physical effects (cancer, yellow teeth, habit forming) as well as psychosocial effects (look cool, relax, have a good time with friends) suggested specific educational strategies. Intenders and nonintenders both reported not believing chewing causes cancer, an erroneous belief. Nonintenders reported belief carry over from smoking: chewing will “make my clothes smelly” and chewing will “give me shortness of breath,” both unfounded. Nonintenders reported less referent support for chewing. Both groups reported a general unwillingness to comply with their significant others. 1988 American School Health Association",
author = "Gerber, {Ruth Wenzl} and Newman, {Ian M.} and Martin, {Gary L.}",
year = "1988",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-1561.1988.tb05816.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "410--413",
journal = "Journal of School Health",
issn = "0022-4391",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Early Adolescent Tobacco Chewing

AU - Gerber, Ruth Wenzl

AU - Newman, Ian M.

AU - Martin, Gary L.

PY - 1988/12

Y1 - 1988/12

N2 - ABSTRACT: Beliefs and social norms elicited from adolescents were employed in the theory of reasoned action to predict early adolescent males' intention to chew tobacco. About 50% of males had chewed tobacco. Responses of chewing intenders and nonintenders differed in response direction and in response strength. Response differences regarding physical effects (cancer, yellow teeth, habit forming) as well as psychosocial effects (look cool, relax, have a good time with friends) suggested specific educational strategies. Intenders and nonintenders both reported not believing chewing causes cancer, an erroneous belief. Nonintenders reported belief carry over from smoking: chewing will “make my clothes smelly” and chewing will “give me shortness of breath,” both unfounded. Nonintenders reported less referent support for chewing. Both groups reported a general unwillingness to comply with their significant others. 1988 American School Health Association

AB - ABSTRACT: Beliefs and social norms elicited from adolescents were employed in the theory of reasoned action to predict early adolescent males' intention to chew tobacco. About 50% of males had chewed tobacco. Responses of chewing intenders and nonintenders differed in response direction and in response strength. Response differences regarding physical effects (cancer, yellow teeth, habit forming) as well as psychosocial effects (look cool, relax, have a good time with friends) suggested specific educational strategies. Intenders and nonintenders both reported not believing chewing causes cancer, an erroneous belief. Nonintenders reported belief carry over from smoking: chewing will “make my clothes smelly” and chewing will “give me shortness of breath,” both unfounded. Nonintenders reported less referent support for chewing. Both groups reported a general unwillingness to comply with their significant others. 1988 American School Health Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024252306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024252306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1988.tb05816.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1988.tb05816.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 3236832

AN - SCOPUS:0024252306

VL - 58

SP - 410

EP - 413

JO - Journal of School Health

JF - Journal of School Health

SN - 0022-4391

IS - 10

ER -