Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter describes some of the striking results of application of social judgment theory (SJT) to medical judgment. Clinical judgment traditionally has been considered an intuitive process whereby the physician combines patient history, new observations, and test results to form a diagnosis or plan of treatment. Medical judgments are characterized by uncertainty, subtle clues, and soft data. Judgment can be studied in different areas of medicine, the diagnosis, and in management of depression. Judgment in psychiatry is often thought to involve a high degree of the “art” of medicine, and as such, is a fertile ground for studying variation in physician judgment. One of the contributions of social judgment theory to medical judgment research has been to identify factors important to physicians in making clinical decisions. Policy capturing may identify heavily weighted clinical variables that would not have been found had the investigators relied on clinicians self reports. In many judgment settings, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the correct outcome of a given case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-245
Number of pages19
JournalAdvances in Psychology
Volume54
Issue numberC
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1988

Fingerprint

Medicine
Physicians
Self Report
Uncertainty
Psychiatry
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine. / Wigton, Robert Swift.

In: Advances in Psychology, Vol. 54, No. C, 01.1988, p. 227-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94fc6c750fcf4d02b24e2009311dee64,
title = "Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine",
abstract = "This chapter describes some of the striking results of application of social judgment theory (SJT) to medical judgment. Clinical judgment traditionally has been considered an intuitive process whereby the physician combines patient history, new observations, and test results to form a diagnosis or plan of treatment. Medical judgments are characterized by uncertainty, subtle clues, and soft data. Judgment can be studied in different areas of medicine, the diagnosis, and in management of depression. Judgment in psychiatry is often thought to involve a high degree of the “art” of medicine, and as such, is a fertile ground for studying variation in physician judgment. One of the contributions of social judgment theory to medical judgment research has been to identify factors important to physicians in making clinical decisions. Policy capturing may identify heavily weighted clinical variables that would not have been found had the investigators relied on clinicians self reports. In many judgment settings, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the correct outcome of a given case.",
author = "Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62175-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "227--245",
journal = "Advances in Psychology",
issn = "0166-4115",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 1988/1

Y1 - 1988/1

N2 - This chapter describes some of the striking results of application of social judgment theory (SJT) to medical judgment. Clinical judgment traditionally has been considered an intuitive process whereby the physician combines patient history, new observations, and test results to form a diagnosis or plan of treatment. Medical judgments are characterized by uncertainty, subtle clues, and soft data. Judgment can be studied in different areas of medicine, the diagnosis, and in management of depression. Judgment in psychiatry is often thought to involve a high degree of the “art” of medicine, and as such, is a fertile ground for studying variation in physician judgment. One of the contributions of social judgment theory to medical judgment research has been to identify factors important to physicians in making clinical decisions. Policy capturing may identify heavily weighted clinical variables that would not have been found had the investigators relied on clinicians self reports. In many judgment settings, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the correct outcome of a given case.

AB - This chapter describes some of the striking results of application of social judgment theory (SJT) to medical judgment. Clinical judgment traditionally has been considered an intuitive process whereby the physician combines patient history, new observations, and test results to form a diagnosis or plan of treatment. Medical judgments are characterized by uncertainty, subtle clues, and soft data. Judgment can be studied in different areas of medicine, the diagnosis, and in management of depression. Judgment in psychiatry is often thought to involve a high degree of the “art” of medicine, and as such, is a fertile ground for studying variation in physician judgment. One of the contributions of social judgment theory to medical judgment research has been to identify factors important to physicians in making clinical decisions. Policy capturing may identify heavily weighted clinical variables that would not have been found had the investigators relied on clinicians self reports. In many judgment settings, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the correct outcome of a given case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0008561497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0008561497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62175-5

DO - 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62175-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0008561497

VL - 54

SP - 227

EP - 245

JO - Advances in Psychology

JF - Advances in Psychology

SN - 0166-4115

IS - C

ER -