Apparent soil electrical conductivity: Applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments

C. K. Johnson, K. M. Eskridge, D. L. Corwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On-farm field-scale research has become increasingly common with the advent of new technologies. While promoting a realistic systems perspective, field-scale experiments do not lend themselves to the traditional design concepts of replication and blocking. Previously, a farm-scale dryland experiment in northeastern Colorado was conducted to evaluate apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) classification (within-field blocking) as a basis for estimating plot-scale experimental error. Comparison of mean-square (MS) errors for several soil properties and surface residue mass measured at this site, with those from a nearby plot-scale experiment, revealed that ECa-classified within-field variance approximates plot-scale experimental error. In the present study, we tested these findings at a second and disparate experimental site, Westlake Farms (WLF) in central California. This 32 ha site was ECa mapped and partitioned into four and five classes using a response-surface model. Classification based on ECa significantly delineated most soil properties evaluated (0-0.3 and/or 0-1.2 m) and effectively reduced MS error (P ≤ 0.10). The MS's for several soil properties evaluated at the site were then compared with those of an associated plot-scale experiment; most MS's were not significantly different between the two levels of scale (P ≤ 0.05), corroborating results from the Colorado experiment. These findings support the use of within-field EC a-classified variance as a surrogate for plot-scale experimental error and a basis for roughly evaluating treatment differences in non-replicated field-scale experiments. This alternative statistical design may promote field-scale research and encourage a reversal in research direction wherein research questions identified in field-scale studies are pursued at the plot-scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-202
Number of pages22
JournalComputers and Electronics in Agriculture
Volume46
Issue number1-3 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

electrical conductivity
Soils
soil properties
farms
Farms
soil
soil property
experiment
Experiments
farm
Mean square error
arid lands
Electric Conductivity
soil surface

Keywords

  • Agricultural systems
  • Classified management maps
  • Geographic information systems
  • Soil electrical conductivity
  • Statistical analyses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Horticulture

Cite this

Apparent soil electrical conductivity : Applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments. / Johnson, C. K.; Eskridge, K. M.; Corwin, D. L.

In: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 46, No. 1-3 SPEC. ISS., 01.03.2005, p. 181-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29327dce292f42a8bd9e8b17a671aaba,
title = "Apparent soil electrical conductivity: Applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments",
abstract = "On-farm field-scale research has become increasingly common with the advent of new technologies. While promoting a realistic systems perspective, field-scale experiments do not lend themselves to the traditional design concepts of replication and blocking. Previously, a farm-scale dryland experiment in northeastern Colorado was conducted to evaluate apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) classification (within-field blocking) as a basis for estimating plot-scale experimental error. Comparison of mean-square (MS) errors for several soil properties and surface residue mass measured at this site, with those from a nearby plot-scale experiment, revealed that ECa-classified within-field variance approximates plot-scale experimental error. In the present study, we tested these findings at a second and disparate experimental site, Westlake Farms (WLF) in central California. This 32 ha site was ECa mapped and partitioned into four and five classes using a response-surface model. Classification based on ECa significantly delineated most soil properties evaluated (0-0.3 and/or 0-1.2 m) and effectively reduced MS error (P ≤ 0.10). The MS's for several soil properties evaluated at the site were then compared with those of an associated plot-scale experiment; most MS's were not significantly different between the two levels of scale (P ≤ 0.05), corroborating results from the Colorado experiment. These findings support the use of within-field EC a-classified variance as a surrogate for plot-scale experimental error and a basis for roughly evaluating treatment differences in non-replicated field-scale experiments. This alternative statistical design may promote field-scale research and encourage a reversal in research direction wherein research questions identified in field-scale studies are pursued at the plot-scale.",
keywords = "Agricultural systems, Classified management maps, Geographic information systems, Soil electrical conductivity, Statistical analyses",
author = "Johnson, {C. K.} and Eskridge, {K. M.} and Corwin, {D. L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.compag.2004.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "181--202",
journal = "Computers and Electronics in Agriculture",
issn = "0168-1699",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Apparent soil electrical conductivity

T2 - Applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments

AU - Johnson, C. K.

AU - Eskridge, K. M.

AU - Corwin, D. L.

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - On-farm field-scale research has become increasingly common with the advent of new technologies. While promoting a realistic systems perspective, field-scale experiments do not lend themselves to the traditional design concepts of replication and blocking. Previously, a farm-scale dryland experiment in northeastern Colorado was conducted to evaluate apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) classification (within-field blocking) as a basis for estimating plot-scale experimental error. Comparison of mean-square (MS) errors for several soil properties and surface residue mass measured at this site, with those from a nearby plot-scale experiment, revealed that ECa-classified within-field variance approximates plot-scale experimental error. In the present study, we tested these findings at a second and disparate experimental site, Westlake Farms (WLF) in central California. This 32 ha site was ECa mapped and partitioned into four and five classes using a response-surface model. Classification based on ECa significantly delineated most soil properties evaluated (0-0.3 and/or 0-1.2 m) and effectively reduced MS error (P ≤ 0.10). The MS's for several soil properties evaluated at the site were then compared with those of an associated plot-scale experiment; most MS's were not significantly different between the two levels of scale (P ≤ 0.05), corroborating results from the Colorado experiment. These findings support the use of within-field EC a-classified variance as a surrogate for plot-scale experimental error and a basis for roughly evaluating treatment differences in non-replicated field-scale experiments. This alternative statistical design may promote field-scale research and encourage a reversal in research direction wherein research questions identified in field-scale studies are pursued at the plot-scale.

AB - On-farm field-scale research has become increasingly common with the advent of new technologies. While promoting a realistic systems perspective, field-scale experiments do not lend themselves to the traditional design concepts of replication and blocking. Previously, a farm-scale dryland experiment in northeastern Colorado was conducted to evaluate apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) classification (within-field blocking) as a basis for estimating plot-scale experimental error. Comparison of mean-square (MS) errors for several soil properties and surface residue mass measured at this site, with those from a nearby plot-scale experiment, revealed that ECa-classified within-field variance approximates plot-scale experimental error. In the present study, we tested these findings at a second and disparate experimental site, Westlake Farms (WLF) in central California. This 32 ha site was ECa mapped and partitioned into four and five classes using a response-surface model. Classification based on ECa significantly delineated most soil properties evaluated (0-0.3 and/or 0-1.2 m) and effectively reduced MS error (P ≤ 0.10). The MS's for several soil properties evaluated at the site were then compared with those of an associated plot-scale experiment; most MS's were not significantly different between the two levels of scale (P ≤ 0.05), corroborating results from the Colorado experiment. These findings support the use of within-field EC a-classified variance as a surrogate for plot-scale experimental error and a basis for roughly evaluating treatment differences in non-replicated field-scale experiments. This alternative statistical design may promote field-scale research and encourage a reversal in research direction wherein research questions identified in field-scale studies are pursued at the plot-scale.

KW - Agricultural systems

KW - Classified management maps

KW - Geographic information systems

KW - Soil electrical conductivity

KW - Statistical analyses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844320985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844320985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compag.2004.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.compag.2004.12.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13844320985

VL - 46

SP - 181

EP - 202

JO - Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

JF - Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

SN - 0168-1699

IS - 1-3 SPEC. ISS.

ER -