Anthropometry and hand performance evaluation of minority population

V. Gnaneswaran, R. R. Bishu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this research was to evaluate the hand anthropometrics and hand performances of the US minority population. This study had three specific objectives (1) to evaluate the anthropometrics of the US minority population and understand their variability within the general US population (2) to evaluate performance variation of the minority population for different hand conditions and (3) to develop models for a set of performance measures using the anthropometry of the upper extremity. Fifteen subjects from each of Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Indians and Vietnamese population groups participated in this study. Hand length, hand breadth, upper-arm length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume were the anthropometrics recorded. Hand performance dimensions including dexterity, tactility, manipulability, grip strength and a set of functional tasks were measured for bare hand and gloved (cotton, Kevlar, leather and vinyl) hand conditions. Anthropometric evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity and gender on hand length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume. Anthropometric comparisons determined that the ethnic groups represented different percentiles within the US population. Performance evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity, gender and glove type on the hand performances of the Minority population. The best models were obtained for grip strength as compared to dexterity and manipulability. More validation is required before generalizing the findings of this study. Relevance to industry: While a number of studies have established differences in anthropometry among different ethnic populations, very few studies have addressed their effect on performance. This study provides fundamental information on the anthropometrics and its effect on hand performance of the minority population in US. The findings of this study will assist engineers to consider personnel variations (anthropometry and performance) to improve productivity. Hence it is very relevant to the industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-670
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

Fingerprint

Anthropometry
Hand
minority
evaluation
Population
performance
Leather
Cotton
Industry
Productivity
Personnel
Engineers
Arm
ethnicity
Hand Strength
Forearm
industry
population group
gender
agricultural product

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Glove evaluation
  • Minority population
  • Performance modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Anthropometry and hand performance evaluation of minority population. / Gnaneswaran, V.; Bishu, R. R.

In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.11.2011, p. 661-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb7cf78d4eec44b0a9a4d707a3515077,
title = "Anthropometry and hand performance evaluation of minority population",
abstract = "The goal of this research was to evaluate the hand anthropometrics and hand performances of the US minority population. This study had three specific objectives (1) to evaluate the anthropometrics of the US minority population and understand their variability within the general US population (2) to evaluate performance variation of the minority population for different hand conditions and (3) to develop models for a set of performance measures using the anthropometry of the upper extremity. Fifteen subjects from each of Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Indians and Vietnamese population groups participated in this study. Hand length, hand breadth, upper-arm length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume were the anthropometrics recorded. Hand performance dimensions including dexterity, tactility, manipulability, grip strength and a set of functional tasks were measured for bare hand and gloved (cotton, Kevlar, leather and vinyl) hand conditions. Anthropometric evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity and gender on hand length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume. Anthropometric comparisons determined that the ethnic groups represented different percentiles within the US population. Performance evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity, gender and glove type on the hand performances of the Minority population. The best models were obtained for grip strength as compared to dexterity and manipulability. More validation is required before generalizing the findings of this study. Relevance to industry: While a number of studies have established differences in anthropometry among different ethnic populations, very few studies have addressed their effect on performance. This study provides fundamental information on the anthropometrics and its effect on hand performance of the minority population in US. The findings of this study will assist engineers to consider personnel variations (anthropometry and performance) to improve productivity. Hence it is very relevant to the industry.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Glove evaluation, Minority population, Performance modeling",
author = "V. Gnaneswaran and Bishu, {R. R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ergon.2011.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "661--670",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",
issn = "0169-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropometry and hand performance evaluation of minority population

AU - Gnaneswaran, V.

AU - Bishu, R. R.

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - The goal of this research was to evaluate the hand anthropometrics and hand performances of the US minority population. This study had three specific objectives (1) to evaluate the anthropometrics of the US minority population and understand their variability within the general US population (2) to evaluate performance variation of the minority population for different hand conditions and (3) to develop models for a set of performance measures using the anthropometry of the upper extremity. Fifteen subjects from each of Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Indians and Vietnamese population groups participated in this study. Hand length, hand breadth, upper-arm length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume were the anthropometrics recorded. Hand performance dimensions including dexterity, tactility, manipulability, grip strength and a set of functional tasks were measured for bare hand and gloved (cotton, Kevlar, leather and vinyl) hand conditions. Anthropometric evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity and gender on hand length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume. Anthropometric comparisons determined that the ethnic groups represented different percentiles within the US population. Performance evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity, gender and glove type on the hand performances of the Minority population. The best models were obtained for grip strength as compared to dexterity and manipulability. More validation is required before generalizing the findings of this study. Relevance to industry: While a number of studies have established differences in anthropometry among different ethnic populations, very few studies have addressed their effect on performance. This study provides fundamental information on the anthropometrics and its effect on hand performance of the minority population in US. The findings of this study will assist engineers to consider personnel variations (anthropometry and performance) to improve productivity. Hence it is very relevant to the industry.

AB - The goal of this research was to evaluate the hand anthropometrics and hand performances of the US minority population. This study had three specific objectives (1) to evaluate the anthropometrics of the US minority population and understand their variability within the general US population (2) to evaluate performance variation of the minority population for different hand conditions and (3) to develop models for a set of performance measures using the anthropometry of the upper extremity. Fifteen subjects from each of Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Indians and Vietnamese population groups participated in this study. Hand length, hand breadth, upper-arm length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume were the anthropometrics recorded. Hand performance dimensions including dexterity, tactility, manipulability, grip strength and a set of functional tasks were measured for bare hand and gloved (cotton, Kevlar, leather and vinyl) hand conditions. Anthropometric evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity and gender on hand length, forearm length, arm length and hand volume. Anthropometric comparisons determined that the ethnic groups represented different percentiles within the US population. Performance evaluations determined a significant effect of ethnicity, gender and glove type on the hand performances of the Minority population. The best models were obtained for grip strength as compared to dexterity and manipulability. More validation is required before generalizing the findings of this study. Relevance to industry: While a number of studies have established differences in anthropometry among different ethnic populations, very few studies have addressed their effect on performance. This study provides fundamental information on the anthropometrics and its effect on hand performance of the minority population in US. The findings of this study will assist engineers to consider personnel variations (anthropometry and performance) to improve productivity. Hence it is very relevant to the industry.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Glove evaluation

KW - Minority population

KW - Performance modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053385770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053385770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.07.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053385770

VL - 41

SP - 661

EP - 670

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

SN - 0169-8141

IS - 6

ER -