Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body-building success

Andrew C. Fry, Alan J. Ryan, Robert Schwab, Dawn R. Powell, William J. Kraemer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A total of 36 non-elite male body builders were observed at the time of competition. Their mean physical characteristics (± s.d.) were: age, 24.6 ± 4.8 years; height, 174.4 ± 6.7 cm; bodyweight, 80.3 ± 11.0 kg. Their body composition values were: percentage body fat, 9.3+ 1.6%; fat-free mass, 72.8 ± 9.8 kg. The mean somatotype for all subjects was: endomorphy, 2.3 ± 0.6; mesomorphy, 6.2 ± 0.9; ectomorphy, 1.2 ± 0.6. The body proportions (cm) included: biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, 1.463 ± 0.132; torso length/height, 0.468 ± 0.018; chest circumference/abdominal circumference, 1.345 ± 0.059. The body builders in the present study were younger, had lower bodyweights, lower fat-free mass, lower mesomorphy ratings, smaller circumferences, and smaller skeletal dimensions than elite body builders reported in the scientific literature. When the body builders in the present study were divided into successful and unsuccessful groups based on actual competition results, a multiple-discriminant analysis found that biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, torso length/height, chest circumference/abdominal circumference, percentage body fat, height, and bodyweight accounted for 80.6% of the explained variance. These data indicate that the success of a body builder can be accounted for in large part by easily obtained physical variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-32
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Torso
Adipose Tissue
Thorax
Fats
Literature
Somatotypes
Body Height
Discriminant Analysis
Body Composition

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Body building
  • Body composition
  • Somatotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body-building success. / Fry, Andrew C.; Ryan, Alan J.; Schwab, Robert; Powell, Dawn R.; Kraemer, William J.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 23-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fry, Andrew C. ; Ryan, Alan J. ; Schwab, Robert ; Powell, Dawn R. ; Kraemer, William J. / Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body-building success. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 1991 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 23-32.
@article{fba45a96a5294b9596dfbc5feecf6807,
title = "Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body-building success",
abstract = "A total of 36 non-elite male body builders were observed at the time of competition. Their mean physical characteristics (± s.d.) were: age, 24.6 ± 4.8 years; height, 174.4 ± 6.7 cm; bodyweight, 80.3 ± 11.0 kg. Their body composition values were: percentage body fat, 9.3+ 1.6{\%}; fat-free mass, 72.8 ± 9.8 kg. The mean somatotype for all subjects was: endomorphy, 2.3 ± 0.6; mesomorphy, 6.2 ± 0.9; ectomorphy, 1.2 ± 0.6. The body proportions (cm) included: biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, 1.463 ± 0.132; torso length/height, 0.468 ± 0.018; chest circumference/abdominal circumference, 1.345 ± 0.059. The body builders in the present study were younger, had lower bodyweights, lower fat-free mass, lower mesomorphy ratings, smaller circumferences, and smaller skeletal dimensions than elite body builders reported in the scientific literature. When the body builders in the present study were divided into successful and unsuccessful groups based on actual competition results, a multiple-discriminant analysis found that biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, torso length/height, chest circumference/abdominal circumference, percentage body fat, height, and bodyweight accounted for 80.6{\%} of the explained variance. These data indicate that the success of a body builder can be accounted for in large part by easily obtained physical variables.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Body building, Body composition, Somatotype",
author = "Fry, {Andrew C.} and Ryan, {Alan J.} and Robert Schwab and Powell, {Dawn R.} and Kraemer, {William J.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02640419108729852",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "23--32",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body-building success

AU - Fry, Andrew C.

AU - Ryan, Alan J.

AU - Schwab, Robert

AU - Powell, Dawn R.

AU - Kraemer, William J.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - A total of 36 non-elite male body builders were observed at the time of competition. Their mean physical characteristics (± s.d.) were: age, 24.6 ± 4.8 years; height, 174.4 ± 6.7 cm; bodyweight, 80.3 ± 11.0 kg. Their body composition values were: percentage body fat, 9.3+ 1.6%; fat-free mass, 72.8 ± 9.8 kg. The mean somatotype for all subjects was: endomorphy, 2.3 ± 0.6; mesomorphy, 6.2 ± 0.9; ectomorphy, 1.2 ± 0.6. The body proportions (cm) included: biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, 1.463 ± 0.132; torso length/height, 0.468 ± 0.018; chest circumference/abdominal circumference, 1.345 ± 0.059. The body builders in the present study were younger, had lower bodyweights, lower fat-free mass, lower mesomorphy ratings, smaller circumferences, and smaller skeletal dimensions than elite body builders reported in the scientific literature. When the body builders in the present study were divided into successful and unsuccessful groups based on actual competition results, a multiple-discriminant analysis found that biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, torso length/height, chest circumference/abdominal circumference, percentage body fat, height, and bodyweight accounted for 80.6% of the explained variance. These data indicate that the success of a body builder can be accounted for in large part by easily obtained physical variables.

AB - A total of 36 non-elite male body builders were observed at the time of competition. Their mean physical characteristics (± s.d.) were: age, 24.6 ± 4.8 years; height, 174.4 ± 6.7 cm; bodyweight, 80.3 ± 11.0 kg. Their body composition values were: percentage body fat, 9.3+ 1.6%; fat-free mass, 72.8 ± 9.8 kg. The mean somatotype for all subjects was: endomorphy, 2.3 ± 0.6; mesomorphy, 6.2 ± 0.9; ectomorphy, 1.2 ± 0.6. The body proportions (cm) included: biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, 1.463 ± 0.132; torso length/height, 0.468 ± 0.018; chest circumference/abdominal circumference, 1.345 ± 0.059. The body builders in the present study were younger, had lower bodyweights, lower fat-free mass, lower mesomorphy ratings, smaller circumferences, and smaller skeletal dimensions than elite body builders reported in the scientific literature. When the body builders in the present study were divided into successful and unsuccessful groups based on actual competition results, a multiple-discriminant analysis found that biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter, torso length/height, chest circumference/abdominal circumference, percentage body fat, height, and bodyweight accounted for 80.6% of the explained variance. These data indicate that the success of a body builder can be accounted for in large part by easily obtained physical variables.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Body building

KW - Body composition

KW - Somatotype

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025756489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025756489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640419108729852

DO - 10.1080/02640419108729852

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 23

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 1

ER -