Ankle ligament laxity and stiffness in chronic ankle instability

Cathleen N. Brown, Adam B Rosen, Jupil Ko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The contribution of mechanical laxity and ligament stiffness to chronic ankle instability is unclear, particularly when using the inversion laxity test, and may have implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Our purpose was to determine if individuals with chronic ankle instability demonstrate greater mechanical ligament laxity and altered stiffness compared to controls and copers (those with a healed sprain) during an instrumented arthrometer inversion stress test. Methods: Recreationally active individuals were classified as those with chronic ankle instability (n = 16), copers (n = 16), or controls (n = 16) based on injury history and self-reported score on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Three trials of an inversion stress test were applied with an instrumented arthrometer utilizing a reliable tester. Talocrural inversion (degrees) and stiffness values were extracted. One-way ANOVAs were calculated, and Tukey post hoc testing was applied (α ≤ .05). Results: Groups were not different in age, height, or weight. The chronic ankle instability group (19 ± 6) had significantly lower CAIT scores than the control (30 ± 1) and coper (29 ± 1) groups (P < .001). The chronic ankle instability group (23 ± 12 degrees) demonstrated significantly greater inversion than the controls (13 ± 9 degrees) (P = .04) but was not significantly different than the copers (17 ± 10 degrees). No significant differences were detected in stiffness between the groups. Conclusion: The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated decreased self-reported ankle function and increased mechanical laxity utilizing an instrumented arthrometer for inversion compared to the control group but not the coper group. Laxity, but not stiffness, may be a factor affecting chronic ankle instability and self-reported function. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-572
Number of pages8
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 11 2015

Fingerprint

Ligaments
Ankle
Exercise Test
Sprains and Strains
Analysis of Variance
Weights and Measures
Control Groups
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • arthrometer
  • coper
  • inversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ankle ligament laxity and stiffness in chronic ankle instability. / Brown, Cathleen N.; Rosen, Adam B; Ko, Jupil.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 36, No. 5, 11.05.2015, p. 565-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Cathleen N. ; Rosen, Adam B ; Ko, Jupil. / Ankle ligament laxity and stiffness in chronic ankle instability. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 565-572.
@article{99070db57cec4f2a91dd0649ebeae23d,
title = "Ankle ligament laxity and stiffness in chronic ankle instability",
abstract = "Background: The contribution of mechanical laxity and ligament stiffness to chronic ankle instability is unclear, particularly when using the inversion laxity test, and may have implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Our purpose was to determine if individuals with chronic ankle instability demonstrate greater mechanical ligament laxity and altered stiffness compared to controls and copers (those with a healed sprain) during an instrumented arthrometer inversion stress test. Methods: Recreationally active individuals were classified as those with chronic ankle instability (n = 16), copers (n = 16), or controls (n = 16) based on injury history and self-reported score on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Three trials of an inversion stress test were applied with an instrumented arthrometer utilizing a reliable tester. Talocrural inversion (degrees) and stiffness values were extracted. One-way ANOVAs were calculated, and Tukey post hoc testing was applied (α ≤ .05). Results: Groups were not different in age, height, or weight. The chronic ankle instability group (19 ± 6) had significantly lower CAIT scores than the control (30 ± 1) and coper (29 ± 1) groups (P < .001). The chronic ankle instability group (23 ± 12 degrees) demonstrated significantly greater inversion than the controls (13 ± 9 degrees) (P = .04) but was not significantly different than the copers (17 ± 10 degrees). No significant differences were detected in stiffness between the groups. Conclusion: The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated decreased self-reported ankle function and increased mechanical laxity utilizing an instrumented arthrometer for inversion compared to the control group but not the coper group. Laxity, but not stiffness, may be a factor affecting chronic ankle instability and self-reported function. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.",
keywords = "arthrometer, coper, inversion",
author = "Brown, {Cathleen N.} and Rosen, {Adam B} and Jupil Ko",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1071100714561057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "565--572",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ankle ligament laxity and stiffness in chronic ankle instability

AU - Brown, Cathleen N.

AU - Rosen, Adam B

AU - Ko, Jupil

PY - 2015/5/11

Y1 - 2015/5/11

N2 - Background: The contribution of mechanical laxity and ligament stiffness to chronic ankle instability is unclear, particularly when using the inversion laxity test, and may have implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Our purpose was to determine if individuals with chronic ankle instability demonstrate greater mechanical ligament laxity and altered stiffness compared to controls and copers (those with a healed sprain) during an instrumented arthrometer inversion stress test. Methods: Recreationally active individuals were classified as those with chronic ankle instability (n = 16), copers (n = 16), or controls (n = 16) based on injury history and self-reported score on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Three trials of an inversion stress test were applied with an instrumented arthrometer utilizing a reliable tester. Talocrural inversion (degrees) and stiffness values were extracted. One-way ANOVAs were calculated, and Tukey post hoc testing was applied (α ≤ .05). Results: Groups were not different in age, height, or weight. The chronic ankle instability group (19 ± 6) had significantly lower CAIT scores than the control (30 ± 1) and coper (29 ± 1) groups (P < .001). The chronic ankle instability group (23 ± 12 degrees) demonstrated significantly greater inversion than the controls (13 ± 9 degrees) (P = .04) but was not significantly different than the copers (17 ± 10 degrees). No significant differences were detected in stiffness between the groups. Conclusion: The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated decreased self-reported ankle function and increased mechanical laxity utilizing an instrumented arthrometer for inversion compared to the control group but not the coper group. Laxity, but not stiffness, may be a factor affecting chronic ankle instability and self-reported function. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

AB - Background: The contribution of mechanical laxity and ligament stiffness to chronic ankle instability is unclear, particularly when using the inversion laxity test, and may have implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Our purpose was to determine if individuals with chronic ankle instability demonstrate greater mechanical ligament laxity and altered stiffness compared to controls and copers (those with a healed sprain) during an instrumented arthrometer inversion stress test. Methods: Recreationally active individuals were classified as those with chronic ankle instability (n = 16), copers (n = 16), or controls (n = 16) based on injury history and self-reported score on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Three trials of an inversion stress test were applied with an instrumented arthrometer utilizing a reliable tester. Talocrural inversion (degrees) and stiffness values were extracted. One-way ANOVAs were calculated, and Tukey post hoc testing was applied (α ≤ .05). Results: Groups were not different in age, height, or weight. The chronic ankle instability group (19 ± 6) had significantly lower CAIT scores than the control (30 ± 1) and coper (29 ± 1) groups (P < .001). The chronic ankle instability group (23 ± 12 degrees) demonstrated significantly greater inversion than the controls (13 ± 9 degrees) (P = .04) but was not significantly different than the copers (17 ± 10 degrees). No significant differences were detected in stiffness between the groups. Conclusion: The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated decreased self-reported ankle function and increased mechanical laxity utilizing an instrumented arthrometer for inversion compared to the control group but not the coper group. Laxity, but not stiffness, may be a factor affecting chronic ankle instability and self-reported function. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

KW - arthrometer

KW - coper

KW - inversion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929153391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929153391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071100714561057

DO - 10.1177/1071100714561057

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 565

EP - 572

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 5

ER -