Analysis of performance of transitional preemption strategy for traffic signal near at-grade railway grade crossing

Hanseon Cho, Laurence R. Rilett, Dongjoo Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the prime objective of current preemption methods at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear the crossing, secondary objectives such as safe pedestrian crossing and vehicle delay are given less consideration or are ignored completely during the preemption. Under certain circumstances state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may cause serious pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings. Recently, an Improved Transition Preemption Strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance and pedestrian safety was developed by Cho and Rilett. Even if the ITPS algorithm improved both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings, it is impossible to measure the exact benefit of ITPS because the ITPS algorithm was tested only for the worst case scenario at the development stage. For this paper, the ITPS algorithm was tested under normal operating condition, that is, trains were designed to arrive at the crossing randomly during the cycle. Also, the effect of pedestrians was analyzed using a VISSIM simulation model which was calibrated to field conditions. Finally, a benefit/cost analysis was performed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings for normal operating condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-579
Number of pages11
JournalKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Crossings (pipe and cable)
Traffic signals
Railroads
Pedestrian safety
Crosswalks
Cost benefit analysis

Keywords

  • Delay
  • Highway-railway grade crossing
  • Safety
  • Traffic signal preemption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Analysis of performance of transitional preemption strategy for traffic signal near at-grade railway grade crossing. / Cho, Hanseon; Rilett, Laurence R.; Park, Dongjoo.

In: KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 569-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca6c812c617e4c19aef5791c0d8a3fba,
title = "Analysis of performance of transitional preemption strategy for traffic signal near at-grade railway grade crossing",
abstract = "Because the prime objective of current preemption methods at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear the crossing, secondary objectives such as safe pedestrian crossing and vehicle delay are given less consideration or are ignored completely during the preemption. Under certain circumstances state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may cause serious pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings. Recently, an Improved Transition Preemption Strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance and pedestrian safety was developed by Cho and Rilett. Even if the ITPS algorithm improved both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings, it is impossible to measure the exact benefit of ITPS because the ITPS algorithm was tested only for the worst case scenario at the development stage. For this paper, the ITPS algorithm was tested under normal operating condition, that is, trains were designed to arrive at the crossing randomly during the cycle. Also, the effect of pedestrians was analyzed using a VISSIM simulation model which was calibrated to field conditions. Finally, a benefit/cost analysis was performed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings for normal operating condition.",
keywords = "Delay, Highway-railway grade crossing, Safety, Traffic signal preemption",
author = "Hanseon Cho and Rilett, {Laurence R.} and Dongjoo Park",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12205-011-1174-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "569--579",
journal = "KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering",
issn = "1226-7988",
publisher = "Korean Society of Civil Engineers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of performance of transitional preemption strategy for traffic signal near at-grade railway grade crossing

AU - Cho, Hanseon

AU - Rilett, Laurence R.

AU - Park, Dongjoo

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Because the prime objective of current preemption methods at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear the crossing, secondary objectives such as safe pedestrian crossing and vehicle delay are given less consideration or are ignored completely during the preemption. Under certain circumstances state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may cause serious pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings. Recently, an Improved Transition Preemption Strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance and pedestrian safety was developed by Cho and Rilett. Even if the ITPS algorithm improved both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings, it is impossible to measure the exact benefit of ITPS because the ITPS algorithm was tested only for the worst case scenario at the development stage. For this paper, the ITPS algorithm was tested under normal operating condition, that is, trains were designed to arrive at the crossing randomly during the cycle. Also, the effect of pedestrians was analyzed using a VISSIM simulation model which was calibrated to field conditions. Finally, a benefit/cost analysis was performed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings for normal operating condition.

AB - Because the prime objective of current preemption methods at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear the crossing, secondary objectives such as safe pedestrian crossing and vehicle delay are given less consideration or are ignored completely during the preemption. Under certain circumstances state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may cause serious pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings. Recently, an Improved Transition Preemption Strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance and pedestrian safety was developed by Cho and Rilett. Even if the ITPS algorithm improved both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings, it is impossible to measure the exact benefit of ITPS because the ITPS algorithm was tested only for the worst case scenario at the development stage. For this paper, the ITPS algorithm was tested under normal operating condition, that is, trains were designed to arrive at the crossing randomly during the cycle. Also, the effect of pedestrians was analyzed using a VISSIM simulation model which was calibrated to field conditions. Finally, a benefit/cost analysis was performed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves both the safety and efficiency of signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings for normal operating condition.

KW - Delay

KW - Highway-railway grade crossing

KW - Safety

KW - Traffic signal preemption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952472393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952472393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12205-011-1174-0

DO - 10.1007/s12205-011-1174-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952472393

VL - 15

SP - 569

EP - 579

JO - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

JF - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

SN - 1226-7988

IS - 3

ER -