An observational study of compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law among retail stores that sell electronic smoking devices

Kelly Buettner-Schmidt, Donald R. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To determine whether retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine were compliant with North Dakota’s smoke-free law. Methods During June 2015, retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine (n=16), but not legally required to be licensed to sell tobacco products, were assessed for compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law by observing for smoking or e-smoking, or evidence of such, in prohibited areas and for the presence of required no-smoking signs. Results Use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, was observed inside 8 (50%) stores required to be smokefree. On the basis of all indicators of compliance assessed, compliance with the state’s smoke-free law was low, with only 6% and 44% of stores compliant with all indoor and outdoor requirements, respectively. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first U.S. study assessing retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine for compliance with the smoke-free law. The use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, occurred in the stores where it is prohibited by law. Overall compliance with the smoke-free law was low. These stores should be licensed by the state, as are other tobacco retailers, because this may assist in education, enforcement and compliance with the law and increase public health protection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-454
Number of pages3
JournalTobacco control
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Smoke
Observational Studies
smoking
Smoking
electronics
nicotine
Equipment and Supplies
Law
Nicotine
Tobacco Products
selling
evidence
Tobacco
Public Health
public health
Education
education
Haemophilus influenzae type b-polysaccharide vaccine-diphtheria toxoid conjugate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

An observational study of compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law among retail stores that sell electronic smoking devices. / Buettner-Schmidt, Kelly; Miller, Donald R.

In: Tobacco control, Vol. 26, No. 4, 07.2017, p. 452-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a7afbd712c443efaea685268b3cf218,
title = "An observational study of compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law among retail stores that sell electronic smoking devices",
abstract = "Objective To determine whether retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine were compliant with North Dakota’s smoke-free law. Methods During June 2015, retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine (n=16), but not legally required to be licensed to sell tobacco products, were assessed for compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law by observing for smoking or e-smoking, or evidence of such, in prohibited areas and for the presence of required no-smoking signs. Results Use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, was observed inside 8 (50{\%}) stores required to be smokefree. On the basis of all indicators of compliance assessed, compliance with the state’s smoke-free law was low, with only 6{\%} and 44{\%} of stores compliant with all indoor and outdoor requirements, respectively. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first U.S. study assessing retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine for compliance with the smoke-free law. The use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, occurred in the stores where it is prohibited by law. Overall compliance with the smoke-free law was low. These stores should be licensed by the state, as are other tobacco retailers, because this may assist in education, enforcement and compliance with the law and increase public health protection.",
author = "Kelly Buettner-Schmidt and Miller, {Donald R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052888",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "452--454",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An observational study of compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law among retail stores that sell electronic smoking devices

AU - Buettner-Schmidt, Kelly

AU - Miller, Donald R.

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - Objective To determine whether retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine were compliant with North Dakota’s smoke-free law. Methods During June 2015, retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine (n=16), but not legally required to be licensed to sell tobacco products, were assessed for compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law by observing for smoking or e-smoking, or evidence of such, in prohibited areas and for the presence of required no-smoking signs. Results Use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, was observed inside 8 (50%) stores required to be smokefree. On the basis of all indicators of compliance assessed, compliance with the state’s smoke-free law was low, with only 6% and 44% of stores compliant with all indoor and outdoor requirements, respectively. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first U.S. study assessing retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine for compliance with the smoke-free law. The use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, occurred in the stores where it is prohibited by law. Overall compliance with the smoke-free law was low. These stores should be licensed by the state, as are other tobacco retailers, because this may assist in education, enforcement and compliance with the law and increase public health protection.

AB - Objective To determine whether retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine were compliant with North Dakota’s smoke-free law. Methods During June 2015, retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine (n=16), but not legally required to be licensed to sell tobacco products, were assessed for compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law by observing for smoking or e-smoking, or evidence of such, in prohibited areas and for the presence of required no-smoking signs. Results Use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, was observed inside 8 (50%) stores required to be smokefree. On the basis of all indicators of compliance assessed, compliance with the state’s smoke-free law was low, with only 6% and 44% of stores compliant with all indoor and outdoor requirements, respectively. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first U.S. study assessing retail stores selling electronic smoking devices or liquid nicotine for compliance with the smoke-free law. The use of e-cigarettes, or evidence of use, occurred in the stores where it is prohibited by law. Overall compliance with the smoke-free law was low. These stores should be licensed by the state, as are other tobacco retailers, because this may assist in education, enforcement and compliance with the law and increase public health protection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977486654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977486654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052888

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052888

M3 - Article

C2 - 27343228

AN - SCOPUS:84977486654

VL - 26

SP - 452

EP - 454

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 4

ER -