An Inverse Problem: Trappers Drove Hares to Eat Lynx

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare pelt data by the Hudson Bay Company did not fit the classical predator–prey theory. Rather than following the peak density of the hare, that of the lynx leads it, creating the hares-eat-lynx (HEL) paradox. Although trappers were suspected to play a role, no mathematical model has ever demonstrated the HEL effect. Here we show that the long-held assumption that the pelt number is a proxy of the wild populations is false and that when the data are modeled by the harvest rates by the trappers, the problem is finally resolved: both the HEL paradox and the classical theory are unified in our mechanistic hare-lynx-competitor-trapper (HLCT) model where competitor stands for all predators of the hares other than the lynx. The result is obtained by systematically fitting the data to various models using Newton’s inverse problem method. Main findings of this study include: the prey-eats-predator paradox in kills by an intraguild top-predator can occur if the top-predator prefers the predator to the prey; the benchmark HLCT model is more sensitive to all lynx-trapper interactions than to the respective hare-trapper interactions; the Hudson Bay Company’s hare pelt number maybe under-reported; and, the most intriguing of all, the trappers did not interfere in each other’s trapping activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-242
Number of pages30
JournalActa Biotheoretica
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Lynx
Hares
hares
Predator
inverse problem
Inverse problems
Inverse Problem
predator
Paradox
furs and pelts
Prey
predators
Hudson Bay
Predator-prey
Mathematical models
wild population
Trapping
Interaction
trapping
Lepus americanus

Keywords

  • Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare
  • Dimensional analysis
  • Holling’s disc function
  • Newton’s line search method
  • Predator–prey model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Philosophy
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

An Inverse Problem : Trappers Drove Hares to Eat Lynx. / Deng, Bo.

In: Acta Biotheoretica, Vol. 66, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 213-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3118b10bc88417d8f9adc6648b7fb8b,
title = "An Inverse Problem: Trappers Drove Hares to Eat Lynx",
abstract = "The Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare pelt data by the Hudson Bay Company did not fit the classical predator–prey theory. Rather than following the peak density of the hare, that of the lynx leads it, creating the hares-eat-lynx (HEL) paradox. Although trappers were suspected to play a role, no mathematical model has ever demonstrated the HEL effect. Here we show that the long-held assumption that the pelt number is a proxy of the wild populations is false and that when the data are modeled by the harvest rates by the trappers, the problem is finally resolved: both the HEL paradox and the classical theory are unified in our mechanistic hare-lynx-competitor-trapper (HLCT) model where competitor stands for all predators of the hares other than the lynx. The result is obtained by systematically fitting the data to various models using Newton’s inverse problem method. Main findings of this study include: the prey-eats-predator paradox in kills by an intraguild top-predator can occur if the top-predator prefers the predator to the prey; the benchmark HLCT model is more sensitive to all lynx-trapper interactions than to the respective hare-trapper interactions; the Hudson Bay Company’s hare pelt number maybe under-reported; and, the most intriguing of all, the trappers did not interfere in each other’s trapping activities.",
keywords = "Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare, Dimensional analysis, Holling’s disc function, Newton’s line search method, Predator–prey model",
author = "Bo Deng",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10441-018-9333-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "213--242",
journal = "Acta Biotheoretica",
issn = "0001-5342",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Inverse Problem

T2 - Trappers Drove Hares to Eat Lynx

AU - Deng, Bo

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare pelt data by the Hudson Bay Company did not fit the classical predator–prey theory. Rather than following the peak density of the hare, that of the lynx leads it, creating the hares-eat-lynx (HEL) paradox. Although trappers were suspected to play a role, no mathematical model has ever demonstrated the HEL effect. Here we show that the long-held assumption that the pelt number is a proxy of the wild populations is false and that when the data are modeled by the harvest rates by the trappers, the problem is finally resolved: both the HEL paradox and the classical theory are unified in our mechanistic hare-lynx-competitor-trapper (HLCT) model where competitor stands for all predators of the hares other than the lynx. The result is obtained by systematically fitting the data to various models using Newton’s inverse problem method. Main findings of this study include: the prey-eats-predator paradox in kills by an intraguild top-predator can occur if the top-predator prefers the predator to the prey; the benchmark HLCT model is more sensitive to all lynx-trapper interactions than to the respective hare-trapper interactions; the Hudson Bay Company’s hare pelt number maybe under-reported; and, the most intriguing of all, the trappers did not interfere in each other’s trapping activities.

AB - The Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare pelt data by the Hudson Bay Company did not fit the classical predator–prey theory. Rather than following the peak density of the hare, that of the lynx leads it, creating the hares-eat-lynx (HEL) paradox. Although trappers were suspected to play a role, no mathematical model has ever demonstrated the HEL effect. Here we show that the long-held assumption that the pelt number is a proxy of the wild populations is false and that when the data are modeled by the harvest rates by the trappers, the problem is finally resolved: both the HEL paradox and the classical theory are unified in our mechanistic hare-lynx-competitor-trapper (HLCT) model where competitor stands for all predators of the hares other than the lynx. The result is obtained by systematically fitting the data to various models using Newton’s inverse problem method. Main findings of this study include: the prey-eats-predator paradox in kills by an intraguild top-predator can occur if the top-predator prefers the predator to the prey; the benchmark HLCT model is more sensitive to all lynx-trapper interactions than to the respective hare-trapper interactions; the Hudson Bay Company’s hare pelt number maybe under-reported; and, the most intriguing of all, the trappers did not interfere in each other’s trapping activities.

KW - Canadian lynx and snowshoe hare

KW - Dimensional analysis

KW - Holling’s disc function

KW - Newton’s line search method

KW - Predator–prey model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047789646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047789646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10441-018-9333-z

DO - 10.1007/s10441-018-9333-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 29846858

AN - SCOPUS:85047789646

VL - 66

SP - 213

EP - 242

JO - Acta Biotheoretica

JF - Acta Biotheoretica

SN - 0001-5342

IS - 3

ER -