An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science: Why now?

Joseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, Steven G. Rogelberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Meetings are an integral part of employees' everyday workplace experiences. In the workplace, people meet to generate ideas, talk about problems, develop solutions, and make decisions (e.g., Romano and Nunamaker, 2001; Van Vree, 2011). What happens in workplace meetings has implications for individual employee attitudes such as work freagement, as well as for team and organizational performance (Allen and Rogelberg, 2013; Kauffeld and Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2012). Today, there are more than 25 million meetings per day in the United States alone (Newlund, 2012). On average, employees of today's organizations spend 6 hours per week sitting in meetings (e.g., Rogelberg, Leach, Warr, and Burnfield, 2006; Schell, 2010). The work lives of employees in managerial positions are even more driven by meetings. A study with senior managers showed that these managers were sitting in meetings for 23 hours a week on average and were expected to have even more meetings in the future (Rogelberg, Scott, and Kello, 2007). The majority of a manager's workday is often spent preparing for meetings, sitting in meetings, or processing meeting results (e.g., Van Vree, 2011). It is likely that most managers spend more of their time on meeting-related activities than on any other activity in their work lives. These figures illustrate a key point: Meetings are ubiquitous and time-intensive workplace events. Practitioners have long recognized this and have built entire consulting practices around organizational meetings. An Amazon search in July 2014 for advice books on how to run meetings yielded 475 hits on topics ranging from planning and leading freaging meetings (e.g., Harvard Business Review, 2014) to collaborating in meetings (e.g., Canfield and Smith, 2011) to when to abandon meetings altogether (e.g., Ressler and Thompson, 2008). Astonishingly, however, a scientific look at meetings as a focal topic remains largely elusive. Granted, research certainly exists that examines constructs/events relevant to meetings and meeting attendees. For example, a body of research on teams and leadership exists, and this literature is certainly highly relevant to meetings – but it does not feature the study of meetings per se. Given that meetings are essential feature of organizations, the development of a meeting science is of paramount importance. Meeting science is the study of what happens before, during, and after meetings in the workplace. It is a look at the psychological, sociological, and anthropological underpinnings and consequences of meetings at work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages3-11
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781107589735
ISBN (Print)9781107067189
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Work place
Managers
Employees
Employee attitudes
Team performance
Consulting
Planning
Organizational performance
Senior managers
Integral
Psychological
Amazon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Allen, J. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2015). An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science: Why now? In The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science (pp. 3-11). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001

An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science : Why now? / Allen, Joseph A.; Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale; Rogelberg, Steven G.

The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 3-11.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Allen, JA, Lehmann-Willenbrock, N & Rogelberg, SG 2015, An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science: Why now? in The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001
Allen JA, Lehmann-Willenbrock N, Rogelberg SG. An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science: Why now? In The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 3-11 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001
Allen, Joseph A. ; Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale ; Rogelberg, Steven G. / An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science : Why now?. The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 3-11
@inbook{9eee19c57acd4973be8db2c1318fba6d,
title = "An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science: Why now?",
abstract = "Meetings are an integral part of employees' everyday workplace experiences. In the workplace, people meet to generate ideas, talk about problems, develop solutions, and make decisions (e.g., Romano and Nunamaker, 2001; Van Vree, 2011). What happens in workplace meetings has implications for individual employee attitudes such as work freagement, as well as for team and organizational performance (Allen and Rogelberg, 2013; Kauffeld and Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2012). Today, there are more than 25 million meetings per day in the United States alone (Newlund, 2012). On average, employees of today's organizations spend 6 hours per week sitting in meetings (e.g., Rogelberg, Leach, Warr, and Burnfield, 2006; Schell, 2010). The work lives of employees in managerial positions are even more driven by meetings. A study with senior managers showed that these managers were sitting in meetings for 23 hours a week on average and were expected to have even more meetings in the future (Rogelberg, Scott, and Kello, 2007). The majority of a manager's workday is often spent preparing for meetings, sitting in meetings, or processing meeting results (e.g., Van Vree, 2011). It is likely that most managers spend more of their time on meeting-related activities than on any other activity in their work lives. These figures illustrate a key point: Meetings are ubiquitous and time-intensive workplace events. Practitioners have long recognized this and have built entire consulting practices around organizational meetings. An Amazon search in July 2014 for advice books on how to run meetings yielded 475 hits on topics ranging from planning and leading freaging meetings (e.g., Harvard Business Review, 2014) to collaborating in meetings (e.g., Canfield and Smith, 2011) to when to abandon meetings altogether (e.g., Ressler and Thompson, 2008). Astonishingly, however, a scientific look at meetings as a focal topic remains largely elusive. Granted, research certainly exists that examines constructs/events relevant to meetings and meeting attendees. For example, a body of research on teams and leadership exists, and this literature is certainly highly relevant to meetings – but it does not feature the study of meetings per se. Given that meetings are essential feature of organizations, the development of a meeting science is of paramount importance. Meeting science is the study of what happens before, during, and after meetings in the workplace. It is a look at the psychological, sociological, and anthropological underpinnings and consequences of meetings at work.",
author = "Allen, {Joseph A.} and Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock and Rogelberg, {Steven G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107067189",
pages = "3--11",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - An introduction to the cambridge handbook of meeting science

T2 - Why now?

AU - Allen, Joseph A.

AU - Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale

AU - Rogelberg, Steven G.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Meetings are an integral part of employees' everyday workplace experiences. In the workplace, people meet to generate ideas, talk about problems, develop solutions, and make decisions (e.g., Romano and Nunamaker, 2001; Van Vree, 2011). What happens in workplace meetings has implications for individual employee attitudes such as work freagement, as well as for team and organizational performance (Allen and Rogelberg, 2013; Kauffeld and Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2012). Today, there are more than 25 million meetings per day in the United States alone (Newlund, 2012). On average, employees of today's organizations spend 6 hours per week sitting in meetings (e.g., Rogelberg, Leach, Warr, and Burnfield, 2006; Schell, 2010). The work lives of employees in managerial positions are even more driven by meetings. A study with senior managers showed that these managers were sitting in meetings for 23 hours a week on average and were expected to have even more meetings in the future (Rogelberg, Scott, and Kello, 2007). The majority of a manager's workday is often spent preparing for meetings, sitting in meetings, or processing meeting results (e.g., Van Vree, 2011). It is likely that most managers spend more of their time on meeting-related activities than on any other activity in their work lives. These figures illustrate a key point: Meetings are ubiquitous and time-intensive workplace events. Practitioners have long recognized this and have built entire consulting practices around organizational meetings. An Amazon search in July 2014 for advice books on how to run meetings yielded 475 hits on topics ranging from planning and leading freaging meetings (e.g., Harvard Business Review, 2014) to collaborating in meetings (e.g., Canfield and Smith, 2011) to when to abandon meetings altogether (e.g., Ressler and Thompson, 2008). Astonishingly, however, a scientific look at meetings as a focal topic remains largely elusive. Granted, research certainly exists that examines constructs/events relevant to meetings and meeting attendees. For example, a body of research on teams and leadership exists, and this literature is certainly highly relevant to meetings – but it does not feature the study of meetings per se. Given that meetings are essential feature of organizations, the development of a meeting science is of paramount importance. Meeting science is the study of what happens before, during, and after meetings in the workplace. It is a look at the psychological, sociological, and anthropological underpinnings and consequences of meetings at work.

AB - Meetings are an integral part of employees' everyday workplace experiences. In the workplace, people meet to generate ideas, talk about problems, develop solutions, and make decisions (e.g., Romano and Nunamaker, 2001; Van Vree, 2011). What happens in workplace meetings has implications for individual employee attitudes such as work freagement, as well as for team and organizational performance (Allen and Rogelberg, 2013; Kauffeld and Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2012). Today, there are more than 25 million meetings per day in the United States alone (Newlund, 2012). On average, employees of today's organizations spend 6 hours per week sitting in meetings (e.g., Rogelberg, Leach, Warr, and Burnfield, 2006; Schell, 2010). The work lives of employees in managerial positions are even more driven by meetings. A study with senior managers showed that these managers were sitting in meetings for 23 hours a week on average and were expected to have even more meetings in the future (Rogelberg, Scott, and Kello, 2007). The majority of a manager's workday is often spent preparing for meetings, sitting in meetings, or processing meeting results (e.g., Van Vree, 2011). It is likely that most managers spend more of their time on meeting-related activities than on any other activity in their work lives. These figures illustrate a key point: Meetings are ubiquitous and time-intensive workplace events. Practitioners have long recognized this and have built entire consulting practices around organizational meetings. An Amazon search in July 2014 for advice books on how to run meetings yielded 475 hits on topics ranging from planning and leading freaging meetings (e.g., Harvard Business Review, 2014) to collaborating in meetings (e.g., Canfield and Smith, 2011) to when to abandon meetings altogether (e.g., Ressler and Thompson, 2008). Astonishingly, however, a scientific look at meetings as a focal topic remains largely elusive. Granted, research certainly exists that examines constructs/events relevant to meetings and meeting attendees. For example, a body of research on teams and leadership exists, and this literature is certainly highly relevant to meetings – but it does not feature the study of meetings per se. Given that meetings are essential feature of organizations, the development of a meeting science is of paramount importance. Meeting science is the study of what happens before, during, and after meetings in the workplace. It is a look at the psychological, sociological, and anthropological underpinnings and consequences of meetings at work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954226031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954226031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.001

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84954226031

SN - 9781107067189

SP - 3

EP - 11

BT - The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -