An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work

Richard L. Wiener, Linda E. Hurt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors reviewed the most recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings regarding sexual harassment (SH) and compared them to legal commentators' calls for reform in the law. Because the courts have ignored empirical evidence, and agreement among social forces is lacking, the judiciary has been unable to send a unified message to regulate social sexual misconduct at work. This analysis of recent social science research suggests that the a more thorough understanding of the fundamentals of SH law is needed. The authors' psycholegal analysis of SH policy adopts the interdisciplinary point of view called social analytic jurisprudence. They summarized some of the empirical findings guided by that perspective and concluded with a set of empirical research questions, the answers to which bring one a more interdisciplinary understanding of social sexual conduct at work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)556-595
Number of pages40
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999

Fingerprint

Sexual Harassment
sexual harassment
Empirical Research
Law
Social Sciences
Jurisprudence
judiciary
jurisprudence
Supreme Court
empirical research
social science
reform
Research
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work. / Wiener, Richard L.; Hurt, Linda E.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 556-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{42d321f0267846edb01ff8c3a9a9176e,
title = "An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work",
abstract = "The authors reviewed the most recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings regarding sexual harassment (SH) and compared them to legal commentators' calls for reform in the law. Because the courts have ignored empirical evidence, and agreement among social forces is lacking, the judiciary has been unable to send a unified message to regulate social sexual misconduct at work. This analysis of recent social science research suggests that the a more thorough understanding of the fundamentals of SH law is needed. The authors' psycholegal analysis of SH policy adopts the interdisciplinary point of view called social analytic jurisprudence. They summarized some of the empirical findings guided by that perspective and concluded with a set of empirical research questions, the answers to which bring one a more interdisciplinary understanding of social sexual conduct at work.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Hurt, {Linda E.}",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.556",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "556--595",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Hurt, Linda E.

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - The authors reviewed the most recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings regarding sexual harassment (SH) and compared them to legal commentators' calls for reform in the law. Because the courts have ignored empirical evidence, and agreement among social forces is lacking, the judiciary has been unable to send a unified message to regulate social sexual misconduct at work. This analysis of recent social science research suggests that the a more thorough understanding of the fundamentals of SH law is needed. The authors' psycholegal analysis of SH policy adopts the interdisciplinary point of view called social analytic jurisprudence. They summarized some of the empirical findings guided by that perspective and concluded with a set of empirical research questions, the answers to which bring one a more interdisciplinary understanding of social sexual conduct at work.

AB - The authors reviewed the most recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings regarding sexual harassment (SH) and compared them to legal commentators' calls for reform in the law. Because the courts have ignored empirical evidence, and agreement among social forces is lacking, the judiciary has been unable to send a unified message to regulate social sexual misconduct at work. This analysis of recent social science research suggests that the a more thorough understanding of the fundamentals of SH law is needed. The authors' psycholegal analysis of SH policy adopts the interdisciplinary point of view called social analytic jurisprudence. They summarized some of the empirical findings guided by that perspective and concluded with a set of empirical research questions, the answers to which bring one a more interdisciplinary understanding of social sexual conduct at work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033258881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033258881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.556

DO - 10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.556

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0033258881

VL - 5

SP - 556

EP - 595

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 3

ER -