An experimental examination of the content of persuasion letters on nonresponse rates and survey estimates in a nonresponse follow-up study

Kristen M Olson, James M. Lepkowski, David H. Garabrant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nonresponse follow-up studies are often conducted to understand whether respondents and nonrespondents differ on survey variables of interest in sample surveys. Methods used to recruit respondents often differ between nonresponse follow-up studies and main studies. One method is persuasion letters sent from study staff to nonrespondents that are tailored to the types of concerns raised by the respondent and recorded in paradata about the survey recruitment process. This study examined whether tailored persuasion letters yield higher response rates in nonresponse follow-up and whether respondents to a nonresponse follow-up differ depending on the content of the persuasion letter. Nonrespondents to the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study, a survey of adults conducted in 2004 and 2005 in five counties in Michigan, were randomly assigned to either an appeal to help the community or tailored types of persuasion letters. No difference in response rates to the letter types was found, but meaningful differences in the survey variables appeared between nonrespondents responding to the follow-up and respondents to the main interview. These differences also occurred between the two groups receiving different types of letters. The community appeal letter appeared to address unvoiced concerns and brought a different sample of nonrespondents compared to the tailored letters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalSurvey Research Methods
Volume5
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

response behavior
persuasion
examination
appeal
community
staff
interview

Keywords

  • Nonresponse
  • Nonresponse bias
  • Persuasion lettersr
  • Survey research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

An experimental examination of the content of persuasion letters on nonresponse rates and survey estimates in a nonresponse follow-up study. / Olson, Kristen M; Lepkowski, James M.; Garabrant, David H.

In: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{629e8ccb421f4d2189200b8a3e8b7601,
title = "An experimental examination of the content of persuasion letters on nonresponse rates and survey estimates in a nonresponse follow-up study",
abstract = "Nonresponse follow-up studies are often conducted to understand whether respondents and nonrespondents differ on survey variables of interest in sample surveys. Methods used to recruit respondents often differ between nonresponse follow-up studies and main studies. One method is persuasion letters sent from study staff to nonrespondents that are tailored to the types of concerns raised by the respondent and recorded in paradata about the survey recruitment process. This study examined whether tailored persuasion letters yield higher response rates in nonresponse follow-up and whether respondents to a nonresponse follow-up differ depending on the content of the persuasion letter. Nonrespondents to the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study, a survey of adults conducted in 2004 and 2005 in five counties in Michigan, were randomly assigned to either an appeal to help the community or tailored types of persuasion letters. No difference in response rates to the letter types was found, but meaningful differences in the survey variables appeared between nonrespondents responding to the follow-up and respondents to the main interview. These differences also occurred between the two groups receiving different types of letters. The community appeal letter appeared to address unvoiced concerns and brought a different sample of nonrespondents compared to the tailored letters.",
keywords = "Nonresponse, Nonresponse bias, Persuasion lettersr, Survey research",
author = "Olson, {Kristen M} and Lepkowski, {James M.} and Garabrant, {David H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "Survey Research Methods",
issn = "1864-3361",
publisher = "European Survey Research Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An experimental examination of the content of persuasion letters on nonresponse rates and survey estimates in a nonresponse follow-up study

AU - Olson, Kristen M

AU - Lepkowski, James M.

AU - Garabrant, David H.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Nonresponse follow-up studies are often conducted to understand whether respondents and nonrespondents differ on survey variables of interest in sample surveys. Methods used to recruit respondents often differ between nonresponse follow-up studies and main studies. One method is persuasion letters sent from study staff to nonrespondents that are tailored to the types of concerns raised by the respondent and recorded in paradata about the survey recruitment process. This study examined whether tailored persuasion letters yield higher response rates in nonresponse follow-up and whether respondents to a nonresponse follow-up differ depending on the content of the persuasion letter. Nonrespondents to the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study, a survey of adults conducted in 2004 and 2005 in five counties in Michigan, were randomly assigned to either an appeal to help the community or tailored types of persuasion letters. No difference in response rates to the letter types was found, but meaningful differences in the survey variables appeared between nonrespondents responding to the follow-up and respondents to the main interview. These differences also occurred between the two groups receiving different types of letters. The community appeal letter appeared to address unvoiced concerns and brought a different sample of nonrespondents compared to the tailored letters.

AB - Nonresponse follow-up studies are often conducted to understand whether respondents and nonrespondents differ on survey variables of interest in sample surveys. Methods used to recruit respondents often differ between nonresponse follow-up studies and main studies. One method is persuasion letters sent from study staff to nonrespondents that are tailored to the types of concerns raised by the respondent and recorded in paradata about the survey recruitment process. This study examined whether tailored persuasion letters yield higher response rates in nonresponse follow-up and whether respondents to a nonresponse follow-up differ depending on the content of the persuasion letter. Nonrespondents to the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study, a survey of adults conducted in 2004 and 2005 in five counties in Michigan, were randomly assigned to either an appeal to help the community or tailored types of persuasion letters. No difference in response rates to the letter types was found, but meaningful differences in the survey variables appeared between nonrespondents responding to the follow-up and respondents to the main interview. These differences also occurred between the two groups receiving different types of letters. The community appeal letter appeared to address unvoiced concerns and brought a different sample of nonrespondents compared to the tailored letters.

KW - Nonresponse

KW - Nonresponse bias

KW - Persuasion lettersr

KW - Survey research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893480656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893480656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - Survey Research Methods

JF - Survey Research Methods

SN - 1864-3361

IS - 1

ER -