An evaluation of two traps and sets for trapping the plains pocket gopher

Stephen M. Vantassel, Andrew J. Tyre, Scott E. Hygnstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the efficiency of DK-1 and Macabee® pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) traps placed in lateral tunnels in both open and closed tunnel sets in rangeland and nonirrigated alfalfa fields in Nebraska. We observed no statistical difference between the traps in capture efficiency when used in open, versus closed, tunnel sets. Trapping of pocket gophers was more effective in rangeland (probability of capture in a single tunnel system using 3 traps; 63%) than nonirrigated alfalfa fields (26%). We did not determine whether this variance was due to behavioral differences between Geomys bursarius and Geomys lutescens. We found that trapping pocket gophers was species specific with only 1 nontarget animal harmed. We suggest modifications to the traps to improve gopher capture rate and lethality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-107
Number of pages8
JournalHuman-Wildlife Interactions
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

trapping
tunnel
alfalfa
rangeland
evaluation
plain
animal

Keywords

  • Alfalfa
  • Geomys bursarius
  • Geomys lutescens
  • Human-wildlife conflicts
  • Rangeland
  • Rodent control
  • Wildlife damage management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

An evaluation of two traps and sets for trapping the plains pocket gopher. / Vantassel, Stephen M.; Tyre, Andrew J.; Hygnstrom, Scott E.

In: Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2014, p. 100-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vantassel, Stephen M. ; Tyre, Andrew J. ; Hygnstrom, Scott E. / An evaluation of two traps and sets for trapping the plains pocket gopher. In: Human-Wildlife Interactions. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 100-107.
@article{a285d63c30ee442fa2b2470db2f928dd,
title = "An evaluation of two traps and sets for trapping the plains pocket gopher",
abstract = "We investigated the efficiency of DK-1 and Macabee{\circledR} pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) traps placed in lateral tunnels in both open and closed tunnel sets in rangeland and nonirrigated alfalfa fields in Nebraska. We observed no statistical difference between the traps in capture efficiency when used in open, versus closed, tunnel sets. Trapping of pocket gophers was more effective in rangeland (probability of capture in a single tunnel system using 3 traps; 63{\%}) than nonirrigated alfalfa fields (26{\%}). We did not determine whether this variance was due to behavioral differences between Geomys bursarius and Geomys lutescens. We found that trapping pocket gophers was species specific with only 1 nontarget animal harmed. We suggest modifications to the traps to improve gopher capture rate and lethality.",
keywords = "Alfalfa, Geomys bursarius, Geomys lutescens, Human-wildlife conflicts, Rangeland, Rodent control, Wildlife damage management",
author = "Vantassel, {Stephen M.} and Tyre, {Andrew J.} and Hygnstrom, {Scott E.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "100--107",
journal = "Human-Wildlife Interactions",
issn = "2155-3858",
publisher = "Jack H. Berryman Institute",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of two traps and sets for trapping the plains pocket gopher

AU - Vantassel, Stephen M.

AU - Tyre, Andrew J.

AU - Hygnstrom, Scott E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We investigated the efficiency of DK-1 and Macabee® pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) traps placed in lateral tunnels in both open and closed tunnel sets in rangeland and nonirrigated alfalfa fields in Nebraska. We observed no statistical difference between the traps in capture efficiency when used in open, versus closed, tunnel sets. Trapping of pocket gophers was more effective in rangeland (probability of capture in a single tunnel system using 3 traps; 63%) than nonirrigated alfalfa fields (26%). We did not determine whether this variance was due to behavioral differences between Geomys bursarius and Geomys lutescens. We found that trapping pocket gophers was species specific with only 1 nontarget animal harmed. We suggest modifications to the traps to improve gopher capture rate and lethality.

AB - We investigated the efficiency of DK-1 and Macabee® pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) traps placed in lateral tunnels in both open and closed tunnel sets in rangeland and nonirrigated alfalfa fields in Nebraska. We observed no statistical difference between the traps in capture efficiency when used in open, versus closed, tunnel sets. Trapping of pocket gophers was more effective in rangeland (probability of capture in a single tunnel system using 3 traps; 63%) than nonirrigated alfalfa fields (26%). We did not determine whether this variance was due to behavioral differences between Geomys bursarius and Geomys lutescens. We found that trapping pocket gophers was species specific with only 1 nontarget animal harmed. We suggest modifications to the traps to improve gopher capture rate and lethality.

KW - Alfalfa

KW - Geomys bursarius

KW - Geomys lutescens

KW - Human-wildlife conflicts

KW - Rangeland

KW - Rodent control

KW - Wildlife damage management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904571284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904571284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904571284

VL - 8

SP - 100

EP - 107

JO - Human-Wildlife Interactions

JF - Human-Wildlife Interactions

SN - 2155-3858

IS - 1

ER -