An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal

Meeta R. Patel, Cathleen C. Piazza, Cheryl J. Martinez, Valerie M. Volkert, Christine M. Santana

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Consumption of solids and liquids occurs as a chain of behaviors that may include accepting, swallowing, and retaining the food or drink. In the current investigation, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of differential reinforcement of the first behavior in the chain (acceptance) versus differential reinforcement for the terminal behavior in the chain (mouth clean). Three children who had been diagnosed with a feeding disorder participated. Acceptance remained at zero when differential reinforcement contingencies were implemented for acceptance or mouth clean. Acceptance and mouth clean increased for all 3 participants once escape extinction was added to the differential reinforcement procedures, independent of whether reinforcement was provided for acceptance or for mouth clean. Maintenance was observed in 2 children when escape extinction was removed from the treatment package. The mechanism by which consumption increased is discussed in relation to positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-374
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Refusal to Treat
reinforcement
food
Food
acceptance
Mouth
evaluation
contingency
Deglutition
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Psychological Extinction
Extinction
Evaluation
Reinforcement
Acceptance
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior
  • Escape extinction
  • Food refusal
  • Negative reinforcement
  • Pediatric feeding disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal. / Patel, Meeta R.; Piazza, Cathleen C.; Martinez, Cheryl J.; Volkert, Valerie M.; Santana, Christine M.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2002, p. 363-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Patel, Meeta R. ; Piazza, Cathleen C. ; Martinez, Cheryl J. ; Volkert, Valerie M. ; Santana, Christine M. / An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 2002 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 363-374.
@article{cae436bcd1184de1869c59add4385de7,
title = "An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal",
abstract = "Consumption of solids and liquids occurs as a chain of behaviors that may include accepting, swallowing, and retaining the food or drink. In the current investigation, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of differential reinforcement of the first behavior in the chain (acceptance) versus differential reinforcement for the terminal behavior in the chain (mouth clean). Three children who had been diagnosed with a feeding disorder participated. Acceptance remained at zero when differential reinforcement contingencies were implemented for acceptance or mouth clean. Acceptance and mouth clean increased for all 3 participants once escape extinction was added to the differential reinforcement procedures, independent of whether reinforcement was provided for acceptance or for mouth clean. Maintenance was observed in 2 children when escape extinction was removed from the treatment package. The mechanism by which consumption increased is discussed in relation to positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.",
keywords = "Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior, Escape extinction, Food refusal, Negative reinforcement, Pediatric feeding disorder",
author = "Patel, {Meeta R.} and Piazza, {Cathleen C.} and Martinez, {Cheryl J.} and Volkert, {Valerie M.} and Santana, {Christine M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2002.35-363",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "363--374",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal

AU - Patel, Meeta R.

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

AU - Martinez, Cheryl J.

AU - Volkert, Valerie M.

AU - Santana, Christine M.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Consumption of solids and liquids occurs as a chain of behaviors that may include accepting, swallowing, and retaining the food or drink. In the current investigation, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of differential reinforcement of the first behavior in the chain (acceptance) versus differential reinforcement for the terminal behavior in the chain (mouth clean). Three children who had been diagnosed with a feeding disorder participated. Acceptance remained at zero when differential reinforcement contingencies were implemented for acceptance or mouth clean. Acceptance and mouth clean increased for all 3 participants once escape extinction was added to the differential reinforcement procedures, independent of whether reinforcement was provided for acceptance or for mouth clean. Maintenance was observed in 2 children when escape extinction was removed from the treatment package. The mechanism by which consumption increased is discussed in relation to positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.

AB - Consumption of solids and liquids occurs as a chain of behaviors that may include accepting, swallowing, and retaining the food or drink. In the current investigation, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of differential reinforcement of the first behavior in the chain (acceptance) versus differential reinforcement for the terminal behavior in the chain (mouth clean). Three children who had been diagnosed with a feeding disorder participated. Acceptance remained at zero when differential reinforcement contingencies were implemented for acceptance or mouth clean. Acceptance and mouth clean increased for all 3 participants once escape extinction was added to the differential reinforcement procedures, independent of whether reinforcement was provided for acceptance or for mouth clean. Maintenance was observed in 2 children when escape extinction was removed from the treatment package. The mechanism by which consumption increased is discussed in relation to positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.

KW - Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior

KW - Escape extinction

KW - Food refusal

KW - Negative reinforcement

KW - Pediatric feeding disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038518325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038518325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-363

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-363

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12555908

AN - SCOPUS:0038518325

VL - 35

SP - 363

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 4

ER -