An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports: A national assessment

Siddhartha Roy, Katherine Phetxumphou, Andrea M. Dietrich, Paul A. Estabrooks, Wen You, Brenda M. Davy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency mandates that community water systems (or water utilities) provide annual consumer confidence reports (CCRs) - water quality reports - to their consumers. These reports encapsulate information regarding sources of water, detected contaminants, regulatory compliance, and educational material. These reports have excellent potential for providing the public with accurate information on the safety of tap water, but there is a lack of research on the degree to which the information can be understood by a large proportion of the population. This study evaluated the readability of a nationally representative sample of 30 CCRs, released between 2011 and 2013. Readability (or 'comprehension difficulty') was evaluated using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. The analysis revealed that CCRs were written at the 11th-14th grade level, which is well above the recommended 6th-7th grade level for public health communications. The CCR readability ease was found to be equivalent to that of the Harvard Law Review journal. These findings expose a wide chasm that exists between current water quality reports and their effectiveness toward being understandable to US residents. Suggestions for reorienting language and scientific information in CCRs to be easily comprehensible to the public are offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-653
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Water and Health
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Water Quality
Drinking Water
drinking water
water quality
Water
water
Health Communication
United States Environmental Protection Agency
compliance
public health
Health Status
Compliance
communication
safety
Language
Public Health
evaluation
pollutant
Safety
Research

Keywords

  • Consumer confidence reports
  • Health communication
  • Readability
  • Tap water
  • Water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports : A national assessment. / Roy, Siddhartha; Phetxumphou, Katherine; Dietrich, Andrea M.; Estabrooks, Paul A.; You, Wen; Davy, Brenda M.

In: Journal of Water and Health, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 645-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roy, Siddhartha ; Phetxumphou, Katherine ; Dietrich, Andrea M. ; Estabrooks, Paul A. ; You, Wen ; Davy, Brenda M. / An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports : A national assessment. In: Journal of Water and Health. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 645-653.
@article{caca2ca09bdc4418aa1b1ec59cd8bee0,
title = "An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports: A national assessment",
abstract = "The United States Environmental Protection Agency mandates that community water systems (or water utilities) provide annual consumer confidence reports (CCRs) - water quality reports - to their consumers. These reports encapsulate information regarding sources of water, detected contaminants, regulatory compliance, and educational material. These reports have excellent potential for providing the public with accurate information on the safety of tap water, but there is a lack of research on the degree to which the information can be understood by a large proportion of the population. This study evaluated the readability of a nationally representative sample of 30 CCRs, released between 2011 and 2013. Readability (or 'comprehension difficulty') was evaluated using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. The analysis revealed that CCRs were written at the 11th-14th grade level, which is well above the recommended 6th-7th grade level for public health communications. The CCR readability ease was found to be equivalent to that of the Harvard Law Review journal. These findings expose a wide chasm that exists between current water quality reports and their effectiveness toward being understandable to US residents. Suggestions for reorienting language and scientific information in CCRs to be easily comprehensible to the public are offered.",
keywords = "Consumer confidence reports, Health communication, Readability, Tap water, Water quality",
author = "Siddhartha Roy and Katherine Phetxumphou and Dietrich, {Andrea M.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A.} and Wen You and Davy, {Brenda M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2166/wh.2015.194",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "645--653",
journal = "Journal of Water and Health",
issn = "1477-8920",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports

T2 - A national assessment

AU - Roy, Siddhartha

AU - Phetxumphou, Katherine

AU - Dietrich, Andrea M.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

AU - You, Wen

AU - Davy, Brenda M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The United States Environmental Protection Agency mandates that community water systems (or water utilities) provide annual consumer confidence reports (CCRs) - water quality reports - to their consumers. These reports encapsulate information regarding sources of water, detected contaminants, regulatory compliance, and educational material. These reports have excellent potential for providing the public with accurate information on the safety of tap water, but there is a lack of research on the degree to which the information can be understood by a large proportion of the population. This study evaluated the readability of a nationally representative sample of 30 CCRs, released between 2011 and 2013. Readability (or 'comprehension difficulty') was evaluated using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. The analysis revealed that CCRs were written at the 11th-14th grade level, which is well above the recommended 6th-7th grade level for public health communications. The CCR readability ease was found to be equivalent to that of the Harvard Law Review journal. These findings expose a wide chasm that exists between current water quality reports and their effectiveness toward being understandable to US residents. Suggestions for reorienting language and scientific information in CCRs to be easily comprehensible to the public are offered.

AB - The United States Environmental Protection Agency mandates that community water systems (or water utilities) provide annual consumer confidence reports (CCRs) - water quality reports - to their consumers. These reports encapsulate information regarding sources of water, detected contaminants, regulatory compliance, and educational material. These reports have excellent potential for providing the public with accurate information on the safety of tap water, but there is a lack of research on the degree to which the information can be understood by a large proportion of the population. This study evaluated the readability of a nationally representative sample of 30 CCRs, released between 2011 and 2013. Readability (or 'comprehension difficulty') was evaluated using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. The analysis revealed that CCRs were written at the 11th-14th grade level, which is well above the recommended 6th-7th grade level for public health communications. The CCR readability ease was found to be equivalent to that of the Harvard Law Review journal. These findings expose a wide chasm that exists between current water quality reports and their effectiveness toward being understandable to US residents. Suggestions for reorienting language and scientific information in CCRs to be easily comprehensible to the public are offered.

KW - Consumer confidence reports

KW - Health communication

KW - Readability

KW - Tap water

KW - Water quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941117608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941117608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/wh.2015.194

DO - 10.2166/wh.2015.194

M3 - Article

C2 - 26322750

AN - SCOPUS:84941117608

VL - 13

SP - 645

EP - 653

JO - Journal of Water and Health

JF - Journal of Water and Health

SN - 1477-8920

IS - 3

ER -