Ambiguity and Freedom of Dissent in Post-Incident Discussion

Clifton Scott, Joseph A. Allen, Daniel L. Bonilla, Benjamin E. Baran, Dave Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants' satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted, the level of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent, however, attenuated the negative influence of ambiguity on AAR satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-402
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Business Communication
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

Incidents
After action review
Dissent
Collective learning
High reliability organizations
Communication

Keywords

  • after-action reviews
  • ambiguity
  • meeting satisfaction
  • organizational dissent
  • sensemaking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Ambiguity and Freedom of Dissent in Post-Incident Discussion. / Scott, Clifton; Allen, Joseph A.; Bonilla, Daniel L.; Baran, Benjamin E.; Murphy, Dave.

In: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 50, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 383-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Scott, Clifton ; Allen, Joseph A. ; Bonilla, Daniel L. ; Baran, Benjamin E. ; Murphy, Dave. / Ambiguity and Freedom of Dissent in Post-Incident Discussion. In: Journal of Business Communication. 2013 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 383-402.
@article{6082f386dcc64d9ea4ea38c0ba89b1f4,
title = "Ambiguity and Freedom of Dissent in Post-Incident Discussion",
abstract = "The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants' satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted, the level of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent, however, attenuated the negative influence of ambiguity on AAR satisfaction.",
keywords = "after-action reviews, ambiguity, meeting satisfaction, organizational dissent, sensemaking",
author = "Clifton Scott and Allen, {Joseph A.} and Bonilla, {Daniel L.} and Baran, {Benjamin E.} and Dave Murphy",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0021943613497054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "383--402",
journal = "International Journal of Business Communication",
issn = "2329-4884",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambiguity and Freedom of Dissent in Post-Incident Discussion

AU - Scott, Clifton

AU - Allen, Joseph A.

AU - Bonilla, Daniel L.

AU - Baran, Benjamin E.

AU - Murphy, Dave

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants' satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted, the level of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent, however, attenuated the negative influence of ambiguity on AAR satisfaction.

AB - The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants' satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted, the level of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent, however, attenuated the negative influence of ambiguity on AAR satisfaction.

KW - after-action reviews

KW - ambiguity

KW - meeting satisfaction

KW - organizational dissent

KW - sensemaking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883547618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883547618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0021943613497054

DO - 10.1177/0021943613497054

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84883547618

VL - 50

SP - 383

EP - 402

JO - International Journal of Business Communication

JF - International Journal of Business Communication

SN - 2329-4884

IS - 4

ER -