Ages of chivalry, places of paternalism: Gender and criminal sentencing in Finland

Candace Kruttschnitt, Jukka Savolainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we argue that the traditional paradigm used to explain the leniency accorded to women offenders in US criminal courts ignores advances in feminist research which suggest how normative patterns that reinforce gender identities can and do change. Using data from Finland, a society generally characterized by more gender equality than is found in the USA, we examine whether an offender's sex has a significant impact on the decision to imprison. Controlling for relevant legal and social characteristics, and considering the conditional effects of labour force participation and parental responsibilities, the findings show that the often-noted preferential treatment given to female offenders, relative to their male counterparts in the USA, is not present in Finland.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-247
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Journal of Criminology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 18 2009

Fingerprint

paternalism
Finland
offender
gender
labor force participation
equality
paradigm
responsibility
present

Keywords

  • Finland
  • Gender
  • Sentencing
  • Sex disparities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Ages of chivalry, places of paternalism : Gender and criminal sentencing in Finland. / Kruttschnitt, Candace; Savolainen, Jukka.

In: European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 18.05.2009, p. 225-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kruttschnitt, Candace ; Savolainen, Jukka. / Ages of chivalry, places of paternalism : Gender and criminal sentencing in Finland. In: European Journal of Criminology. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 225-247.
@article{837709c6ef55404684ecbd855cf0452a,
title = "Ages of chivalry, places of paternalism: Gender and criminal sentencing in Finland",
abstract = "In this study, we argue that the traditional paradigm used to explain the leniency accorded to women offenders in US criminal courts ignores advances in feminist research which suggest how normative patterns that reinforce gender identities can and do change. Using data from Finland, a society generally characterized by more gender equality than is found in the USA, we examine whether an offender's sex has a significant impact on the decision to imprison. Controlling for relevant legal and social characteristics, and considering the conditional effects of labour force participation and parental responsibilities, the findings show that the often-noted preferential treatment given to female offenders, relative to their male counterparts in the USA, is not present in Finland.",
keywords = "Finland, Gender, Sentencing, Sex disparities",
author = "Candace Kruttschnitt and Jukka Savolainen",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1177/1477370809102166",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "225--247",
journal = "European Journal of Criminology",
issn = "1477-3708",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ages of chivalry, places of paternalism

T2 - Gender and criminal sentencing in Finland

AU - Kruttschnitt, Candace

AU - Savolainen, Jukka

PY - 2009/5/18

Y1 - 2009/5/18

N2 - In this study, we argue that the traditional paradigm used to explain the leniency accorded to women offenders in US criminal courts ignores advances in feminist research which suggest how normative patterns that reinforce gender identities can and do change. Using data from Finland, a society generally characterized by more gender equality than is found in the USA, we examine whether an offender's sex has a significant impact on the decision to imprison. Controlling for relevant legal and social characteristics, and considering the conditional effects of labour force participation and parental responsibilities, the findings show that the often-noted preferential treatment given to female offenders, relative to their male counterparts in the USA, is not present in Finland.

AB - In this study, we argue that the traditional paradigm used to explain the leniency accorded to women offenders in US criminal courts ignores advances in feminist research which suggest how normative patterns that reinforce gender identities can and do change. Using data from Finland, a society generally characterized by more gender equality than is found in the USA, we examine whether an offender's sex has a significant impact on the decision to imprison. Controlling for relevant legal and social characteristics, and considering the conditional effects of labour force participation and parental responsibilities, the findings show that the often-noted preferential treatment given to female offenders, relative to their male counterparts in the USA, is not present in Finland.

KW - Finland

KW - Gender

KW - Sentencing

KW - Sex disparities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65549132426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65549132426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1477370809102166

DO - 10.1177/1477370809102166

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65549132426

VL - 6

SP - 225

EP - 247

JO - European Journal of Criminology

JF - European Journal of Criminology

SN - 1477-3708

IS - 3

ER -