Age differences in visual working memory capacity

Not based on encoding limitations

Nelson Cowan, Angela M AuBuchon, Amanda L. Gilchrist, Timothy J. Ricker, J. Scott Saults

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why does visual working memory performance increase with age in childhood? One recent study (Cowan ., 2010b) ruled out the possibility that the basic cause is a tendency in young children to clutter working memory with less-relevant items (within a concurrent array, colored items presented in one of two shapes). The age differences in memory performance, however, theoretically could result from inadequate encoding of the briefly presented array items by younger children. We replicated the key part of the procedure in children 6-8 and 11-13years old and college students (total N=90), but with a much slower, sequential presentation of the items to ensure adequate encoding. We also required verbal responses during encoding to encourage or discourage labeling of item information. Although verbal labeling affected performance, age differences persisted across labeling conditions, further supporting the existence of a basic growth in capacity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1066-1074
Number of pages9
JournalDevelopmental Science
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Students
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Age differences in visual working memory capacity : Not based on encoding limitations. / Cowan, Nelson; AuBuchon, Angela M; Gilchrist, Amanda L.; Ricker, Timothy J.; Saults, J. Scott.

In: Developmental Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 1066-1074.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cowan, Nelson ; AuBuchon, Angela M ; Gilchrist, Amanda L. ; Ricker, Timothy J. ; Saults, J. Scott. / Age differences in visual working memory capacity : Not based on encoding limitations. In: Developmental Science. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 1066-1074.
@article{2fb4bcdac868473d8deb861b0a4d7dc3,
title = "Age differences in visual working memory capacity: Not based on encoding limitations",
abstract = "Why does visual working memory performance increase with age in childhood? One recent study (Cowan ., 2010b) ruled out the possibility that the basic cause is a tendency in young children to clutter working memory with less-relevant items (within a concurrent array, colored items presented in one of two shapes). The age differences in memory performance, however, theoretically could result from inadequate encoding of the briefly presented array items by younger children. We replicated the key part of the procedure in children 6-8 and 11-13years old and college students (total N=90), but with a much slower, sequential presentation of the items to ensure adequate encoding. We also required verbal responses during encoding to encourage or discourage labeling of item information. Although verbal labeling affected performance, age differences persisted across labeling conditions, further supporting the existence of a basic growth in capacity.",
author = "Nelson Cowan and AuBuchon, {Angela M} and Gilchrist, {Amanda L.} and Ricker, {Timothy J.} and Saults, {J. Scott}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01060.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1066--1074",
journal = "Developmental Science",
issn = "1363-755X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Age differences in visual working memory capacity

T2 - Not based on encoding limitations

AU - Cowan, Nelson

AU - AuBuchon, Angela M

AU - Gilchrist, Amanda L.

AU - Ricker, Timothy J.

AU - Saults, J. Scott

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Why does visual working memory performance increase with age in childhood? One recent study (Cowan ., 2010b) ruled out the possibility that the basic cause is a tendency in young children to clutter working memory with less-relevant items (within a concurrent array, colored items presented in one of two shapes). The age differences in memory performance, however, theoretically could result from inadequate encoding of the briefly presented array items by younger children. We replicated the key part of the procedure in children 6-8 and 11-13years old and college students (total N=90), but with a much slower, sequential presentation of the items to ensure adequate encoding. We also required verbal responses during encoding to encourage or discourage labeling of item information. Although verbal labeling affected performance, age differences persisted across labeling conditions, further supporting the existence of a basic growth in capacity.

AB - Why does visual working memory performance increase with age in childhood? One recent study (Cowan ., 2010b) ruled out the possibility that the basic cause is a tendency in young children to clutter working memory with less-relevant items (within a concurrent array, colored items presented in one of two shapes). The age differences in memory performance, however, theoretically could result from inadequate encoding of the briefly presented array items by younger children. We replicated the key part of the procedure in children 6-8 and 11-13years old and college students (total N=90), but with a much slower, sequential presentation of the items to ensure adequate encoding. We also required verbal responses during encoding to encourage or discourage labeling of item information. Although verbal labeling affected performance, age differences persisted across labeling conditions, further supporting the existence of a basic growth in capacity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051929855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051929855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01060.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01060.x

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1066

EP - 1074

JO - Developmental Science

JF - Developmental Science

SN - 1363-755X

IS - 5

ER -