Adoption of electronic health records: A qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators

Lisa Grabenbauer, R. Fraser, James C McClay, N. Woelfl, Cheryl Thompson, J. Cambell, John Robert Windle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Less than 20% of hospitals in the US have an electronic health record (EHR). In this qualitative study, we examine the perspectives of both academic and private physicians and administrators as stakeholders, and their alignment, to explore their perspectives on the use of technology in the clinical environment. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 74 participants who were asked a series of openended questions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build convergent themes. The relevance and importance of themes was constructed by examining frequency, convergence, and intensity. A model was proposed that represents the interactions between themes. Results: Six major themes emerged, which include the impact of EHR systems on workflow, patient care, communication, research/outcomes/billing, education/learning, and institutional culture. Academic and private physicians were confident of the future benefits of EHR systems, yet cautious about the current implementations of EHR, and its impact on interactions with other members of the healthcare team and with patients, and the amount of time necessary to use EHR's. Private physicians differed on education and were uneasy about the steep learning curve necessary for use of new systems. In contrast to physicians, university and hospital administrators are optimistic, and value the availability of data for use in reporting. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that both private and academic physicians concur on the need for features that maintain and enhance the relationship with the patient and the healthcare team. Resistance to adoption is related to insufficient functionality and its potential negative impact on patient care. Integration of data collection into clinical workflows must consider the unexpected costs of data acquisition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-176
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Administrative Personnel
Health
Physicians
Patient Care Team
Workflow
Education
Patient Care
Hospital Administrators
Learning Curve
Data acquisition
Focus Groups
Availability
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs

Keywords

  • Adoption
  • Health information technology
  • Workflow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Adoption of electronic health records : A qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators. / Grabenbauer, Lisa; Fraser, R.; McClay, James C; Woelfl, N.; Thompson, Cheryl; Cambell, J.; Windle, John Robert.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.12.2011, p. 165-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{551432e26a5f4403a06d20fbbe10e7bb,
title = "Adoption of electronic health records: A qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators",
abstract = "Objective: Less than 20{\%} of hospitals in the US have an electronic health record (EHR). In this qualitative study, we examine the perspectives of both academic and private physicians and administrators as stakeholders, and their alignment, to explore their perspectives on the use of technology in the clinical environment. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 74 participants who were asked a series of openended questions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build convergent themes. The relevance and importance of themes was constructed by examining frequency, convergence, and intensity. A model was proposed that represents the interactions between themes. Results: Six major themes emerged, which include the impact of EHR systems on workflow, patient care, communication, research/outcomes/billing, education/learning, and institutional culture. Academic and private physicians were confident of the future benefits of EHR systems, yet cautious about the current implementations of EHR, and its impact on interactions with other members of the healthcare team and with patients, and the amount of time necessary to use EHR's. Private physicians differed on education and were uneasy about the steep learning curve necessary for use of new systems. In contrast to physicians, university and hospital administrators are optimistic, and value the availability of data for use in reporting. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that both private and academic physicians concur on the need for features that maintain and enhance the relationship with the patient and the healthcare team. Resistance to adoption is related to insufficient functionality and its potential negative impact on patient care. Integration of data collection into clinical workflows must consider the unexpected costs of data acquisition.",
keywords = "Adoption, Health information technology, Workflow",
author = "Lisa Grabenbauer and R. Fraser and McClay, {James C} and N. Woelfl and Cheryl Thompson and J. Cambell and Windle, {John Robert}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "165--176",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of electronic health records

T2 - A qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators

AU - Grabenbauer, Lisa

AU - Fraser, R.

AU - McClay, James C

AU - Woelfl, N.

AU - Thompson, Cheryl

AU - Cambell, J.

AU - Windle, John Robert

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Objective: Less than 20% of hospitals in the US have an electronic health record (EHR). In this qualitative study, we examine the perspectives of both academic and private physicians and administrators as stakeholders, and their alignment, to explore their perspectives on the use of technology in the clinical environment. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 74 participants who were asked a series of openended questions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build convergent themes. The relevance and importance of themes was constructed by examining frequency, convergence, and intensity. A model was proposed that represents the interactions between themes. Results: Six major themes emerged, which include the impact of EHR systems on workflow, patient care, communication, research/outcomes/billing, education/learning, and institutional culture. Academic and private physicians were confident of the future benefits of EHR systems, yet cautious about the current implementations of EHR, and its impact on interactions with other members of the healthcare team and with patients, and the amount of time necessary to use EHR's. Private physicians differed on education and were uneasy about the steep learning curve necessary for use of new systems. In contrast to physicians, university and hospital administrators are optimistic, and value the availability of data for use in reporting. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that both private and academic physicians concur on the need for features that maintain and enhance the relationship with the patient and the healthcare team. Resistance to adoption is related to insufficient functionality and its potential negative impact on patient care. Integration of data collection into clinical workflows must consider the unexpected costs of data acquisition.

AB - Objective: Less than 20% of hospitals in the US have an electronic health record (EHR). In this qualitative study, we examine the perspectives of both academic and private physicians and administrators as stakeholders, and their alignment, to explore their perspectives on the use of technology in the clinical environment. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 74 participants who were asked a series of openended questions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build convergent themes. The relevance and importance of themes was constructed by examining frequency, convergence, and intensity. A model was proposed that represents the interactions between themes. Results: Six major themes emerged, which include the impact of EHR systems on workflow, patient care, communication, research/outcomes/billing, education/learning, and institutional culture. Academic and private physicians were confident of the future benefits of EHR systems, yet cautious about the current implementations of EHR, and its impact on interactions with other members of the healthcare team and with patients, and the amount of time necessary to use EHR's. Private physicians differed on education and were uneasy about the steep learning curve necessary for use of new systems. In contrast to physicians, university and hospital administrators are optimistic, and value the availability of data for use in reporting. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that both private and academic physicians concur on the need for features that maintain and enhance the relationship with the patient and the healthcare team. Resistance to adoption is related to insufficient functionality and its potential negative impact on patient care. Integration of data collection into clinical workflows must consider the unexpected costs of data acquisition.

KW - Adoption

KW - Health information technology

KW - Workflow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884478866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884478866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0003

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0003

M3 - Article

C2 - 23616868

AN - SCOPUS:84884478866

VL - 2

SP - 165

EP - 176

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 2

ER -