Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer

Meaghann S. Weaver, Justin N. Baker, Jami S. Gattuso, Deborah V. Gibson, April D. Sykes, Pamela S. Hinds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND This qualitative study investigated the medical decision-making preferences of adolescent oncology patients and the parental and clinician behaviors that adolescents report to be supportive of their preferred level of decision-making involvement. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 40 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who were undergoing cancer treatment in Memphis, Tenn or Washington, DC. Role preferences were converted into a predetermined Likert scale decisional preference score. A semantic content analysis was used to analyze patient reports of parental behaviors, attitudes, knowledge levels, and relational interactions that facilitated their preferred level of involvement in decision making. Clinician behaviors described as supportive of decisional processes were also categorized thematically. A teen advisory council validated study findings. Data reporting followed strict adherence to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS Adolescents indicated a spectrum of preferred decisional roles, with the most common being an actively involved role (26 of 40 or 65%), although a shared decision-making approach was still valued. There was no statistically significant difference in the preferred decisional role with respect to demographic or medical characteristics, including the relapse status, although adolescents who preferred autonomous interview settings were more likely to prefer active decisional roles (P <.001). Adolescents recognized that situational and social contexts might shift their preferred level of involvement in medical decisions. Although adolescents wanted to be involved in decisions, they also expressed an appreciation of family insight, parental presence, and clinician guidance. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents with cancer are able to retrospectively identify their preferences for inclusion in medical decision making, and even when preferring involvement, they value the input of trusted others. Cancer 2015;121:4416-24.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4416-4424
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume121
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2015

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Decision Making
Therapeutics
Interviews
Adolescent Behavior
Qualitative Research
Semantics
Research Design
Demography
Guidelines
Recurrence
Clinical Decision-Making

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • communication
  • decision making
  • oncology
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Weaver, M. S., Baker, J. N., Gattuso, J. S., Gibson, D. V., Sykes, A. D., & Hinds, P. S. (2015). Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer. Cancer, 121(24), 4416-4424. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29663

Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer. / Weaver, Meaghann S.; Baker, Justin N.; Gattuso, Jami S.; Gibson, Deborah V.; Sykes, April D.; Hinds, Pamela S.

In: Cancer, Vol. 121, No. 24, 15.12.2015, p. 4416-4424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weaver, MS, Baker, JN, Gattuso, JS, Gibson, DV, Sykes, AD & Hinds, PS 2015, 'Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer', Cancer, vol. 121, no. 24, pp. 4416-4424. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29663
Weaver MS, Baker JN, Gattuso JS, Gibson DV, Sykes AD, Hinds PS. Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer. Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;121(24):4416-4424. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29663
Weaver, Meaghann S. ; Baker, Justin N. ; Gattuso, Jami S. ; Gibson, Deborah V. ; Sykes, April D. ; Hinds, Pamela S. / Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer. In: Cancer. 2015 ; Vol. 121, No. 24. pp. 4416-4424.
@article{05bf2df31e4a45bdb545ef8d633b062c,
title = "Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer",
abstract = "BACKGROUND This qualitative study investigated the medical decision-making preferences of adolescent oncology patients and the parental and clinician behaviors that adolescents report to be supportive of their preferred level of decision-making involvement. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 40 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who were undergoing cancer treatment in Memphis, Tenn or Washington, DC. Role preferences were converted into a predetermined Likert scale decisional preference score. A semantic content analysis was used to analyze patient reports of parental behaviors, attitudes, knowledge levels, and relational interactions that facilitated their preferred level of involvement in decision making. Clinician behaviors described as supportive of decisional processes were also categorized thematically. A teen advisory council validated study findings. Data reporting followed strict adherence to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS Adolescents indicated a spectrum of preferred decisional roles, with the most common being an actively involved role (26 of 40 or 65{\%}), although a shared decision-making approach was still valued. There was no statistically significant difference in the preferred decisional role with respect to demographic or medical characteristics, including the relapse status, although adolescents who preferred autonomous interview settings were more likely to prefer active decisional roles (P <.001). Adolescents recognized that situational and social contexts might shift their preferred level of involvement in medical decisions. Although adolescents wanted to be involved in decisions, they also expressed an appreciation of family insight, parental presence, and clinician guidance. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents with cancer are able to retrospectively identify their preferences for inclusion in medical decision making, and even when preferring involvement, they value the input of trusted others. Cancer 2015;121:4416-24.",
keywords = "adolescent, communication, decision making, oncology, qualitative research",
author = "Weaver, {Meaghann S.} and Baker, {Justin N.} and Gattuso, {Jami S.} and Gibson, {Deborah V.} and Sykes, {April D.} and Hinds, {Pamela S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.29663",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "4416--4424",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer

AU - Weaver, Meaghann S.

AU - Baker, Justin N.

AU - Gattuso, Jami S.

AU - Gibson, Deborah V.

AU - Sykes, April D.

AU - Hinds, Pamela S.

PY - 2015/12/15

Y1 - 2015/12/15

N2 - BACKGROUND This qualitative study investigated the medical decision-making preferences of adolescent oncology patients and the parental and clinician behaviors that adolescents report to be supportive of their preferred level of decision-making involvement. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 40 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who were undergoing cancer treatment in Memphis, Tenn or Washington, DC. Role preferences were converted into a predetermined Likert scale decisional preference score. A semantic content analysis was used to analyze patient reports of parental behaviors, attitudes, knowledge levels, and relational interactions that facilitated their preferred level of involvement in decision making. Clinician behaviors described as supportive of decisional processes were also categorized thematically. A teen advisory council validated study findings. Data reporting followed strict adherence to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS Adolescents indicated a spectrum of preferred decisional roles, with the most common being an actively involved role (26 of 40 or 65%), although a shared decision-making approach was still valued. There was no statistically significant difference in the preferred decisional role with respect to demographic or medical characteristics, including the relapse status, although adolescents who preferred autonomous interview settings were more likely to prefer active decisional roles (P <.001). Adolescents recognized that situational and social contexts might shift their preferred level of involvement in medical decisions. Although adolescents wanted to be involved in decisions, they also expressed an appreciation of family insight, parental presence, and clinician guidance. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents with cancer are able to retrospectively identify their preferences for inclusion in medical decision making, and even when preferring involvement, they value the input of trusted others. Cancer 2015;121:4416-24.

AB - BACKGROUND This qualitative study investigated the medical decision-making preferences of adolescent oncology patients and the parental and clinician behaviors that adolescents report to be supportive of their preferred level of decision-making involvement. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 40 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who were undergoing cancer treatment in Memphis, Tenn or Washington, DC. Role preferences were converted into a predetermined Likert scale decisional preference score. A semantic content analysis was used to analyze patient reports of parental behaviors, attitudes, knowledge levels, and relational interactions that facilitated their preferred level of involvement in decision making. Clinician behaviors described as supportive of decisional processes were also categorized thematically. A teen advisory council validated study findings. Data reporting followed strict adherence to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS Adolescents indicated a spectrum of preferred decisional roles, with the most common being an actively involved role (26 of 40 or 65%), although a shared decision-making approach was still valued. There was no statistically significant difference in the preferred decisional role with respect to demographic or medical characteristics, including the relapse status, although adolescents who preferred autonomous interview settings were more likely to prefer active decisional roles (P <.001). Adolescents recognized that situational and social contexts might shift their preferred level of involvement in medical decisions. Although adolescents wanted to be involved in decisions, they also expressed an appreciation of family insight, parental presence, and clinician guidance. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents with cancer are able to retrospectively identify their preferences for inclusion in medical decision making, and even when preferring involvement, they value the input of trusted others. Cancer 2015;121:4416-24.

KW - adolescent

KW - communication

KW - decision making

KW - oncology

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949323495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949323495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.29663

DO - 10.1002/cncr.29663

M3 - Article

C2 - 26348790

AN - SCOPUS:84949323495

VL - 121

SP - 4416

EP - 4424

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 24

ER -