Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-tract patients

Fidela Sj Blank, Tim J. Mader, Jeannette Wolfe, Marjorie Keyes, Ronald I Kirschner, Deborah Provost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The new standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations specify the patient's right to appropriate assessment and management of pain. With this impetus, we looked at our own practice to see how well we assess and manage patients with pain. Methods: Patients who presented with minor nonemergent pain were interviewed on arrival, and then again before discharge, with use of a structured questionnaire. A total of 68 completed pain surveys were analyzed. Results: With use of a Visual Analog Scale, patients rated their pain on arrival and at discharge; they also rated pain they were willing to accept when it was time for discharge. Sixty percent of the patients went home with more pain than they were willing to accept. Fifty-one percent of the patients were offered something for pain, and only half of them said the pain relief was adequate. The median time from arrival to administration of pain medication was 104 minutes. Surprisingly, the median patient satisfaction rating for overall care was "very good." Discussion: This survey revealed that acute pain conditions are underevaluated and undertreated in one fast-track setting, suggesting that ED staff need more education about the management of acute pain. It also showed that relying on patient satisfaction surveys as surrogate markers for how well we manage pain is erroneous.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-334
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emergency Nursing
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Pain
Acute Pain
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Patient Rights
Pain Management
Visual Analog Scale
Biomarkers
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency

Cite this

Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-tract patients. / Blank, Fidela Sj; Mader, Tim J.; Wolfe, Jeannette; Keyes, Marjorie; Kirschner, Ronald I; Provost, Deborah.

In: Journal of Emergency Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 327-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blank, Fidela Sj ; Mader, Tim J. ; Wolfe, Jeannette ; Keyes, Marjorie ; Kirschner, Ronald I ; Provost, Deborah. / Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-tract patients. In: Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2001 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 327-334.
@article{f7efeed99c7e47629922246ab031cf80,
title = "Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-tract patients",
abstract = "Introduction: The new standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations specify the patient's right to appropriate assessment and management of pain. With this impetus, we looked at our own practice to see how well we assess and manage patients with pain. Methods: Patients who presented with minor nonemergent pain were interviewed on arrival, and then again before discharge, with use of a structured questionnaire. A total of 68 completed pain surveys were analyzed. Results: With use of a Visual Analog Scale, patients rated their pain on arrival and at discharge; they also rated pain they were willing to accept when it was time for discharge. Sixty percent of the patients went home with more pain than they were willing to accept. Fifty-one percent of the patients were offered something for pain, and only half of them said the pain relief was adequate. The median time from arrival to administration of pain medication was 104 minutes. Surprisingly, the median patient satisfaction rating for overall care was {"}very good.{"} Discussion: This survey revealed that acute pain conditions are underevaluated and undertreated in one fast-track setting, suggesting that ED staff need more education about the management of acute pain. It also showed that relying on patient satisfaction surveys as surrogate markers for how well we manage pain is erroneous.",
author = "Blank, {Fidela Sj} and Mader, {Tim J.} and Jeannette Wolfe and Marjorie Keyes and Kirschner, {Ronald I} and Deborah Provost",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/men.2001.116648",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "327--334",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Nursing",
issn = "0099-1767",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-tract patients

AU - Blank, Fidela Sj

AU - Mader, Tim J.

AU - Wolfe, Jeannette

AU - Keyes, Marjorie

AU - Kirschner, Ronald I

AU - Provost, Deborah

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Introduction: The new standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations specify the patient's right to appropriate assessment and management of pain. With this impetus, we looked at our own practice to see how well we assess and manage patients with pain. Methods: Patients who presented with minor nonemergent pain were interviewed on arrival, and then again before discharge, with use of a structured questionnaire. A total of 68 completed pain surveys were analyzed. Results: With use of a Visual Analog Scale, patients rated their pain on arrival and at discharge; they also rated pain they were willing to accept when it was time for discharge. Sixty percent of the patients went home with more pain than they were willing to accept. Fifty-one percent of the patients were offered something for pain, and only half of them said the pain relief was adequate. The median time from arrival to administration of pain medication was 104 minutes. Surprisingly, the median patient satisfaction rating for overall care was "very good." Discussion: This survey revealed that acute pain conditions are underevaluated and undertreated in one fast-track setting, suggesting that ED staff need more education about the management of acute pain. It also showed that relying on patient satisfaction surveys as surrogate markers for how well we manage pain is erroneous.

AB - Introduction: The new standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations specify the patient's right to appropriate assessment and management of pain. With this impetus, we looked at our own practice to see how well we assess and manage patients with pain. Methods: Patients who presented with minor nonemergent pain were interviewed on arrival, and then again before discharge, with use of a structured questionnaire. A total of 68 completed pain surveys were analyzed. Results: With use of a Visual Analog Scale, patients rated their pain on arrival and at discharge; they also rated pain they were willing to accept when it was time for discharge. Sixty percent of the patients went home with more pain than they were willing to accept. Fifty-one percent of the patients were offered something for pain, and only half of them said the pain relief was adequate. The median time from arrival to administration of pain medication was 104 minutes. Surprisingly, the median patient satisfaction rating for overall care was "very good." Discussion: This survey revealed that acute pain conditions are underevaluated and undertreated in one fast-track setting, suggesting that ED staff need more education about the management of acute pain. It also showed that relying on patient satisfaction surveys as surrogate markers for how well we manage pain is erroneous.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035168082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035168082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/men.2001.116648

DO - 10.1067/men.2001.116648

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 327

EP - 334

JO - Journal of Emergency Nursing

JF - Journal of Emergency Nursing

SN - 0099-1767

IS - 4

ER -