Activism, deliberation, and networked public screens: Rhetorical scenes from the Occupy moment in Lincoln, Nebraska (Part 1)

Joshua P. Ewalt, Jessy J. Ohl, Damien Smith Pfister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Part 1 of this manuscript is a dramatization of five rhetorical scenes that take the Occupy phenomenon as a moment to explore features of contemporary social protest and change. Drawing on rhetorical field notes collected over the first two weeks of Occupy Lincoln in Nebraska, we identify how historical tensions between activism and deliberation were both complicated and reasserted as the Occupy moment became a movement. The rhetorical scenes partially replicate actual conversations, though they are remediated through three composite figures: Anda, a longtime social activist; John, an advocate of democratic deliberation; and Dajuan, an undergraduate organizer of the local Occupy Movement. The footnotes throughout the dramatization anchor scholarly observations in Part 2 of the manuscript, a "footnote essay" which develops the concept of "networked public screens."The footnotes in the dramatization "Activism, Deliberation, and Networked Public Screens," published as Part 1 in this issue, point to the numerated paragraphs in Part 2. This interpretive "footnote essay" makes four contributions. First, we locate tensions between activism and deliberation in the scholarly literature on social change that manifest in the dramatization. Second, we explain and justify our method of assembling rhetorical scenes. Third, we develop the concept of "networked public screens." Finally, we articulate a distinction between movement and moment that bears on the broader Occupations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-190
Number of pages18
JournalCultural Studies - Critical Methodologies
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

deliberation
protest
social change
occupation
conversation
Dramatization
Rhetoric
Deliberation
Activism
Manuscripts

Keywords

  • activism
  • deliberation
  • networked public screens
  • rhetorical scenes
  • social movements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Activism, deliberation, and networked public screens : Rhetorical scenes from the Occupy moment in Lincoln, Nebraska (Part 1). / Ewalt, Joshua P.; Ohl, Jessy J.; Pfister, Damien Smith.

In: Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 173-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{826dbf3cf65d477a84897d8b6ff7019c,
title = "Activism, deliberation, and networked public screens: Rhetorical scenes from the Occupy moment in Lincoln, Nebraska (Part 1)",
abstract = "Part 1 of this manuscript is a dramatization of five rhetorical scenes that take the Occupy phenomenon as a moment to explore features of contemporary social protest and change. Drawing on rhetorical field notes collected over the first two weeks of Occupy Lincoln in Nebraska, we identify how historical tensions between activism and deliberation were both complicated and reasserted as the Occupy moment became a movement. The rhetorical scenes partially replicate actual conversations, though they are remediated through three composite figures: Anda, a longtime social activist; John, an advocate of democratic deliberation; and Dajuan, an undergraduate organizer of the local Occupy Movement. The footnotes throughout the dramatization anchor scholarly observations in Part 2 of the manuscript, a {"}footnote essay{"} which develops the concept of {"}networked public screens.{"}The footnotes in the dramatization {"}Activism, Deliberation, and Networked Public Screens,{"} published as Part 1 in this issue, point to the numerated paragraphs in Part 2. This interpretive {"}footnote essay{"} makes four contributions. First, we locate tensions between activism and deliberation in the scholarly literature on social change that manifest in the dramatization. Second, we explain and justify our method of assembling rhetorical scenes. Third, we develop the concept of {"}networked public screens.{"} Finally, we articulate a distinction between movement and moment that bears on the broader Occupations.",
keywords = "activism, deliberation, networked public screens, rhetorical scenes, social movements",
author = "Ewalt, {Joshua P.} and Ohl, {Jessy J.} and Pfister, {Damien Smith}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1532708613477360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "173--190",
journal = "Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies",
issn = "1532-7086",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activism, deliberation, and networked public screens

T2 - Rhetorical scenes from the Occupy moment in Lincoln, Nebraska (Part 1)

AU - Ewalt, Joshua P.

AU - Ohl, Jessy J.

AU - Pfister, Damien Smith

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Part 1 of this manuscript is a dramatization of five rhetorical scenes that take the Occupy phenomenon as a moment to explore features of contemporary social protest and change. Drawing on rhetorical field notes collected over the first two weeks of Occupy Lincoln in Nebraska, we identify how historical tensions between activism and deliberation were both complicated and reasserted as the Occupy moment became a movement. The rhetorical scenes partially replicate actual conversations, though they are remediated through three composite figures: Anda, a longtime social activist; John, an advocate of democratic deliberation; and Dajuan, an undergraduate organizer of the local Occupy Movement. The footnotes throughout the dramatization anchor scholarly observations in Part 2 of the manuscript, a "footnote essay" which develops the concept of "networked public screens."The footnotes in the dramatization "Activism, Deliberation, and Networked Public Screens," published as Part 1 in this issue, point to the numerated paragraphs in Part 2. This interpretive "footnote essay" makes four contributions. First, we locate tensions between activism and deliberation in the scholarly literature on social change that manifest in the dramatization. Second, we explain and justify our method of assembling rhetorical scenes. Third, we develop the concept of "networked public screens." Finally, we articulate a distinction between movement and moment that bears on the broader Occupations.

AB - Part 1 of this manuscript is a dramatization of five rhetorical scenes that take the Occupy phenomenon as a moment to explore features of contemporary social protest and change. Drawing on rhetorical field notes collected over the first two weeks of Occupy Lincoln in Nebraska, we identify how historical tensions between activism and deliberation were both complicated and reasserted as the Occupy moment became a movement. The rhetorical scenes partially replicate actual conversations, though they are remediated through three composite figures: Anda, a longtime social activist; John, an advocate of democratic deliberation; and Dajuan, an undergraduate organizer of the local Occupy Movement. The footnotes throughout the dramatization anchor scholarly observations in Part 2 of the manuscript, a "footnote essay" which develops the concept of "networked public screens."The footnotes in the dramatization "Activism, Deliberation, and Networked Public Screens," published as Part 1 in this issue, point to the numerated paragraphs in Part 2. This interpretive "footnote essay" makes four contributions. First, we locate tensions between activism and deliberation in the scholarly literature on social change that manifest in the dramatization. Second, we explain and justify our method of assembling rhetorical scenes. Third, we develop the concept of "networked public screens." Finally, we articulate a distinction between movement and moment that bears on the broader Occupations.

KW - activism

KW - deliberation

KW - networked public screens

KW - rhetorical scenes

KW - social movements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877999016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877999016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532708613477360

DO - 10.1177/1532708613477360

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877999016

VL - 13

SP - 173

EP - 190

JO - Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies

JF - Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies

SN - 1532-7086

IS - 3

ER -