Accounting for Lesbian-Headed Families

Lesbian Mothers' Responses to Discursive Challenges

Jody L Kellas, Elizabeth A. Suter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although lesbian mothers are often called to justify their family's legitimacy, we know little about these interactions. The current study included 44 female coparents across 10 focus groups discussing the interactive process of discursive legitimacy challenges. Using the theoretical framework of remedial accounts (Schönbach, 1990), inductive and deductive coding revealed several existing and new types of challenges, accounting strategies, and evaluations relevant to interactions of lesbian mothers. Communicative processes unique to the interactions of female coparents included challenges emerging from societal master narratives (e.g., health care, education, politics, religion); accounting strategies such as leading by example; and evaluations related to the ways in which children render the family acceptable. Findings offer strategies for coping with the discursive challenges lesbian mothers encounter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-498
Number of pages24
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Health care
Education
legitimacy
interaction
evaluation
coding
coping
Religion
health care
narrative
politics
Discursive
Lesbian
Interaction
education
Group
Evaluation
Legitimacy

Keywords

  • Account Episodes
  • Discourse Dependent Families
  • Lesbian-Headed Families
  • Remedial Accounts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Accounting for Lesbian-Headed Families : Lesbian Mothers' Responses to Discursive Challenges. / Kellas, Jody L; Suter, Elizabeth A.

In: Communication Monographs, Vol. 79, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 475-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fad2b2aa1e2f4ca5b382ae23f9418891,
title = "Accounting for Lesbian-Headed Families: Lesbian Mothers' Responses to Discursive Challenges",
abstract = "Although lesbian mothers are often called to justify their family's legitimacy, we know little about these interactions. The current study included 44 female coparents across 10 focus groups discussing the interactive process of discursive legitimacy challenges. Using the theoretical framework of remedial accounts (Sch{\"o}nbach, 1990), inductive and deductive coding revealed several existing and new types of challenges, accounting strategies, and evaluations relevant to interactions of lesbian mothers. Communicative processes unique to the interactions of female coparents included challenges emerging from societal master narratives (e.g., health care, education, politics, religion); accounting strategies such as leading by example; and evaluations related to the ways in which children render the family acceptable. Findings offer strategies for coping with the discursive challenges lesbian mothers encounter.",
keywords = "Account Episodes, Discourse Dependent Families, Lesbian-Headed Families, Remedial Accounts",
author = "Kellas, {Jody L} and Suter, {Elizabeth A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03637751.2012.723812",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "475--498",
journal = "Communication Monographs",
issn = "0363-7751",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for Lesbian-Headed Families

T2 - Lesbian Mothers' Responses to Discursive Challenges

AU - Kellas, Jody L

AU - Suter, Elizabeth A.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Although lesbian mothers are often called to justify their family's legitimacy, we know little about these interactions. The current study included 44 female coparents across 10 focus groups discussing the interactive process of discursive legitimacy challenges. Using the theoretical framework of remedial accounts (Schönbach, 1990), inductive and deductive coding revealed several existing and new types of challenges, accounting strategies, and evaluations relevant to interactions of lesbian mothers. Communicative processes unique to the interactions of female coparents included challenges emerging from societal master narratives (e.g., health care, education, politics, religion); accounting strategies such as leading by example; and evaluations related to the ways in which children render the family acceptable. Findings offer strategies for coping with the discursive challenges lesbian mothers encounter.

AB - Although lesbian mothers are often called to justify their family's legitimacy, we know little about these interactions. The current study included 44 female coparents across 10 focus groups discussing the interactive process of discursive legitimacy challenges. Using the theoretical framework of remedial accounts (Schönbach, 1990), inductive and deductive coding revealed several existing and new types of challenges, accounting strategies, and evaluations relevant to interactions of lesbian mothers. Communicative processes unique to the interactions of female coparents included challenges emerging from societal master narratives (e.g., health care, education, politics, religion); accounting strategies such as leading by example; and evaluations related to the ways in which children render the family acceptable. Findings offer strategies for coping with the discursive challenges lesbian mothers encounter.

KW - Account Episodes

KW - Discourse Dependent Families

KW - Lesbian-Headed Families

KW - Remedial Accounts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869782611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869782611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03637751.2012.723812

DO - 10.1080/03637751.2012.723812

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 475

EP - 498

JO - Communication Monographs

JF - Communication Monographs

SN - 0363-7751

IS - 4

ER -