A SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING TREATMENT INTEGRITY IN SCHOOL SETTINGS

Sara Kupzyk, Mark D Shriver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

School psychologists are tasked with ensuring treatment integrity because the level of intervention implementation affects decisions about student progress. Treatment integrity includes multiple dimensions that may impact the effectiveness of an intervention including adherence, dosage, quality, and engagement. Unfortunately, treatment integrity is not routinely monitored in consultation. A systematic framework is needed to better prepare practitioners to assess, analyze, and intervene when there are treatment integrity failures. A framework for monitoring and improving multiple dimensions of treatment integrity in natural settings is proposed to provide guidance to practitioners through two phases. The first phase focuses on improving initial treatment integrity and the second phase outlines a problem-solving process for improving treatment integrity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)954-970
Number of pages17
JournalPsychology in the Schools
Volume53
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

integrity
school
Therapeutics
school psychologist
Treatment Failure
Referral and Consultation
Students
Psychology
monitoring
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING TREATMENT INTEGRITY IN SCHOOL SETTINGS. / Kupzyk, Sara; Shriver, Mark D.

In: Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 53, No. 9, 01.11.2016, p. 954-970.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f1f69e3e6c24026b03e354c99dbe2cc,
title = "A SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING TREATMENT INTEGRITY IN SCHOOL SETTINGS",
abstract = "School psychologists are tasked with ensuring treatment integrity because the level of intervention implementation affects decisions about student progress. Treatment integrity includes multiple dimensions that may impact the effectiveness of an intervention including adherence, dosage, quality, and engagement. Unfortunately, treatment integrity is not routinely monitored in consultation. A systematic framework is needed to better prepare practitioners to assess, analyze, and intervene when there are treatment integrity failures. A framework for monitoring and improving multiple dimensions of treatment integrity in natural settings is proposed to provide guidance to practitioners through two phases. The first phase focuses on improving initial treatment integrity and the second phase outlines a problem-solving process for improving treatment integrity.",
author = "Sara Kupzyk and Shriver, {Mark D}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pits.21955",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "954--970",
journal = "Psychology in the Schools",
issn = "0033-3085",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING TREATMENT INTEGRITY IN SCHOOL SETTINGS

AU - Kupzyk, Sara

AU - Shriver, Mark D

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - School psychologists are tasked with ensuring treatment integrity because the level of intervention implementation affects decisions about student progress. Treatment integrity includes multiple dimensions that may impact the effectiveness of an intervention including adherence, dosage, quality, and engagement. Unfortunately, treatment integrity is not routinely monitored in consultation. A systematic framework is needed to better prepare practitioners to assess, analyze, and intervene when there are treatment integrity failures. A framework for monitoring and improving multiple dimensions of treatment integrity in natural settings is proposed to provide guidance to practitioners through two phases. The first phase focuses on improving initial treatment integrity and the second phase outlines a problem-solving process for improving treatment integrity.

AB - School psychologists are tasked with ensuring treatment integrity because the level of intervention implementation affects decisions about student progress. Treatment integrity includes multiple dimensions that may impact the effectiveness of an intervention including adherence, dosage, quality, and engagement. Unfortunately, treatment integrity is not routinely monitored in consultation. A systematic framework is needed to better prepare practitioners to assess, analyze, and intervene when there are treatment integrity failures. A framework for monitoring and improving multiple dimensions of treatment integrity in natural settings is proposed to provide guidance to practitioners through two phases. The first phase focuses on improving initial treatment integrity and the second phase outlines a problem-solving process for improving treatment integrity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989244711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989244711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pits.21955

DO - 10.1002/pits.21955

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989244711

VL - 53

SP - 954

EP - 970

JO - Psychology in the Schools

JF - Psychology in the Schools

SN - 0033-3085

IS - 9

ER -