A synthesis of mathematics writing: Assessments, interventions, and surveys

Sarah R. Powell, Michael A. Hebert, Jeremy A. Cohen, Tutita M. Casa, Janine M. Firmender

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mathematics standards in the United States describe communication as an essential part of mathematics. One outlet for communication is writing. To understand the mathematics writing of students, we conducted a synthesis to evaluate empirical research about mathematics writing. We identified 29 studies that included a mathematics-writing assessment, intervention, or survey for students in 1st through 12th grade. All studies were published between 1991 and 2015. The majority of assessments required students to write explanations to mathematical problems, and fewer than half scored student responses according to a rubric. Approximately half of the interventions involved the use of mathematics journals as an outlet for mathematics writing. Few intervention studies provided explicit direction on how to write in mathematics, and a small number of investigations provided statistical evidence of intervention efficacy. From the surveys, the majority of students expressed enjoyment when writing in mathematics settings but teachers reported using mathematics writing rarely. Across studies, findings indicate mathematics writing is used for a variety of purposes, but the quality of the studies is variable and more empirical research is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-526
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Writing Research
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

mathematics
student
empirical research
Mathematics
Writing Assessment
communication
school grade
teacher
evidence

Keywords

  • Mathematical communication
  • Mathematics
  • Mathematics writing
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

A synthesis of mathematics writing : Assessments, interventions, and surveys. / Powell, Sarah R.; Hebert, Michael A.; Cohen, Jeremy A.; Casa, Tutita M.; Firmender, Janine M.

In: Journal of Writing Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 493-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powell, Sarah R. ; Hebert, Michael A. ; Cohen, Jeremy A. ; Casa, Tutita M. ; Firmender, Janine M. / A synthesis of mathematics writing : Assessments, interventions, and surveys. In: Journal of Writing Research. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 493-526.
@article{a40a9e928987486d8355332cb0aa9940,
title = "A synthesis of mathematics writing: Assessments, interventions, and surveys",
abstract = "Mathematics standards in the United States describe communication as an essential part of mathematics. One outlet for communication is writing. To understand the mathematics writing of students, we conducted a synthesis to evaluate empirical research about mathematics writing. We identified 29 studies that included a mathematics-writing assessment, intervention, or survey for students in 1st through 12th grade. All studies were published between 1991 and 2015. The majority of assessments required students to write explanations to mathematical problems, and fewer than half scored student responses according to a rubric. Approximately half of the interventions involved the use of mathematics journals as an outlet for mathematics writing. Few intervention studies provided explicit direction on how to write in mathematics, and a small number of investigations provided statistical evidence of intervention efficacy. From the surveys, the majority of students expressed enjoyment when writing in mathematics settings but teachers reported using mathematics writing rarely. Across studies, findings indicate mathematics writing is used for a variety of purposes, but the quality of the studies is variable and more empirical research is needed.",
keywords = "Mathematical communication, Mathematics, Mathematics writing, Writing",
author = "Powell, {Sarah R.} and Hebert, {Michael A.} and Cohen, {Jeremy A.} and Casa, {Tutita M.} and Firmender, {Janine M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "493--526",
journal = "Journal of Writing Research",
issn = "2030-1006",
publisher = "University of Antwerp",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A synthesis of mathematics writing

T2 - Assessments, interventions, and surveys

AU - Powell, Sarah R.

AU - Hebert, Michael A.

AU - Cohen, Jeremy A.

AU - Casa, Tutita M.

AU - Firmender, Janine M.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Mathematics standards in the United States describe communication as an essential part of mathematics. One outlet for communication is writing. To understand the mathematics writing of students, we conducted a synthesis to evaluate empirical research about mathematics writing. We identified 29 studies that included a mathematics-writing assessment, intervention, or survey for students in 1st through 12th grade. All studies were published between 1991 and 2015. The majority of assessments required students to write explanations to mathematical problems, and fewer than half scored student responses according to a rubric. Approximately half of the interventions involved the use of mathematics journals as an outlet for mathematics writing. Few intervention studies provided explicit direction on how to write in mathematics, and a small number of investigations provided statistical evidence of intervention efficacy. From the surveys, the majority of students expressed enjoyment when writing in mathematics settings but teachers reported using mathematics writing rarely. Across studies, findings indicate mathematics writing is used for a variety of purposes, but the quality of the studies is variable and more empirical research is needed.

AB - Mathematics standards in the United States describe communication as an essential part of mathematics. One outlet for communication is writing. To understand the mathematics writing of students, we conducted a synthesis to evaluate empirical research about mathematics writing. We identified 29 studies that included a mathematics-writing assessment, intervention, or survey for students in 1st through 12th grade. All studies were published between 1991 and 2015. The majority of assessments required students to write explanations to mathematical problems, and fewer than half scored student responses according to a rubric. Approximately half of the interventions involved the use of mathematics journals as an outlet for mathematics writing. Few intervention studies provided explicit direction on how to write in mathematics, and a small number of investigations provided statistical evidence of intervention efficacy. From the surveys, the majority of students expressed enjoyment when writing in mathematics settings but teachers reported using mathematics writing rarely. Across studies, findings indicate mathematics writing is used for a variety of purposes, but the quality of the studies is variable and more empirical research is needed.

KW - Mathematical communication

KW - Mathematics

KW - Mathematics writing

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014503276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014503276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04

DO - 10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014503276

VL - 8

SP - 493

EP - 526

JO - Journal of Writing Research

JF - Journal of Writing Research

SN - 2030-1006

IS - 3

ER -