A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening

Heather R. Peck, Denise M. Timko, James D. Landmark, Douglas F. Stickle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sample collection instructions for the bloodspot lead screening program conducted by the Nebraska Medical Center recommend continuous application of a single finger-stick blood drop per printed filter paper circle (a volume of approximately 50 μl). In this study, we assessed whether apparent blood volumes and geometries of finger-stick bloodspot samples submitted for lead testing were consistent with collection recommendations. Methods: Samples were 422 extra bloodspots from 138 patients that were submitted for lead analysis. Using image analysis, apparent blood volumes were computed by comparison of bloodspot areas to bloodspot areas for standards of known volume. Circularity of samples was also assessed by image analysis. Results: Mean blood volume (25 ± 13 μl) was approximately 50% of that needed to fill a printed circle. The distribution of volumes had three local maxima, consistent with bloodspot formation by multiple discrete applications of blood drops of small volumes (17 ± 6 μl) rather than by continuous application of blood. Multi-drop samples were also apparent from non-circular geometries. Conclusions: Bloodspots submitted for lead analysis showed an apparently inherent drop volume of less than 20 μl per drop and the application of multiple drops. Non-ideality of such specimens indicates the need for continuing education of bloodspot collectors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-106
Number of pages4
JournalClinica Chimica Acta
Volume400
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Blood Volume
Screening
Blood
Fingers
Geometry
Continuing Education
Image analysis
Lead
Surveys and Questionnaires
Education
Testing

Keywords

  • Bloodspot
  • Filter paper
  • Lead
  • Lead screening
  • Preanalytical variables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening. / Peck, Heather R.; Timko, Denise M.; Landmark, James D.; Stickle, Douglas F.

In: Clinica Chimica Acta, Vol. 400, No. 1-2, 01.02.2009, p. 103-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peck, Heather R. ; Timko, Denise M. ; Landmark, James D. ; Stickle, Douglas F. / A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening. In: Clinica Chimica Acta. 2009 ; Vol. 400, No. 1-2. pp. 103-106.
@article{18968d03150147949c05e50ffb0f585a,
title = "A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening",
abstract = "Background: Sample collection instructions for the bloodspot lead screening program conducted by the Nebraska Medical Center recommend continuous application of a single finger-stick blood drop per printed filter paper circle (a volume of approximately 50 μl). In this study, we assessed whether apparent blood volumes and geometries of finger-stick bloodspot samples submitted for lead testing were consistent with collection recommendations. Methods: Samples were 422 extra bloodspots from 138 patients that were submitted for lead analysis. Using image analysis, apparent blood volumes were computed by comparison of bloodspot areas to bloodspot areas for standards of known volume. Circularity of samples was also assessed by image analysis. Results: Mean blood volume (25 ± 13 μl) was approximately 50{\%} of that needed to fill a printed circle. The distribution of volumes had three local maxima, consistent with bloodspot formation by multiple discrete applications of blood drops of small volumes (17 ± 6 μl) rather than by continuous application of blood. Multi-drop samples were also apparent from non-circular geometries. Conclusions: Bloodspots submitted for lead analysis showed an apparently inherent drop volume of less than 20 μl per drop and the application of multiple drops. Non-ideality of such specimens indicates the need for continuing education of bloodspot collectors.",
keywords = "Bloodspot, Filter paper, Lead, Lead screening, Preanalytical variables",
author = "Peck, {Heather R.} and Timko, {Denise M.} and Landmark, {James D.} and Stickle, {Douglas F.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "400",
pages = "103--106",
journal = "Clinica Chimica Acta",
issn = "0009-8981",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening

AU - Peck, Heather R.

AU - Timko, Denise M.

AU - Landmark, James D.

AU - Stickle, Douglas F.

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Background: Sample collection instructions for the bloodspot lead screening program conducted by the Nebraska Medical Center recommend continuous application of a single finger-stick blood drop per printed filter paper circle (a volume of approximately 50 μl). In this study, we assessed whether apparent blood volumes and geometries of finger-stick bloodspot samples submitted for lead testing were consistent with collection recommendations. Methods: Samples were 422 extra bloodspots from 138 patients that were submitted for lead analysis. Using image analysis, apparent blood volumes were computed by comparison of bloodspot areas to bloodspot areas for standards of known volume. Circularity of samples was also assessed by image analysis. Results: Mean blood volume (25 ± 13 μl) was approximately 50% of that needed to fill a printed circle. The distribution of volumes had three local maxima, consistent with bloodspot formation by multiple discrete applications of blood drops of small volumes (17 ± 6 μl) rather than by continuous application of blood. Multi-drop samples were also apparent from non-circular geometries. Conclusions: Bloodspots submitted for lead analysis showed an apparently inherent drop volume of less than 20 μl per drop and the application of multiple drops. Non-ideality of such specimens indicates the need for continuing education of bloodspot collectors.

AB - Background: Sample collection instructions for the bloodspot lead screening program conducted by the Nebraska Medical Center recommend continuous application of a single finger-stick blood drop per printed filter paper circle (a volume of approximately 50 μl). In this study, we assessed whether apparent blood volumes and geometries of finger-stick bloodspot samples submitted for lead testing were consistent with collection recommendations. Methods: Samples were 422 extra bloodspots from 138 patients that were submitted for lead analysis. Using image analysis, apparent blood volumes were computed by comparison of bloodspot areas to bloodspot areas for standards of known volume. Circularity of samples was also assessed by image analysis. Results: Mean blood volume (25 ± 13 μl) was approximately 50% of that needed to fill a printed circle. The distribution of volumes had three local maxima, consistent with bloodspot formation by multiple discrete applications of blood drops of small volumes (17 ± 6 μl) rather than by continuous application of blood. Multi-drop samples were also apparent from non-circular geometries. Conclusions: Bloodspots submitted for lead analysis showed an apparently inherent drop volume of less than 20 μl per drop and the application of multiple drops. Non-ideality of such specimens indicates the need for continuing education of bloodspot collectors.

KW - Bloodspot

KW - Filter paper

KW - Lead

KW - Lead screening

KW - Preanalytical variables

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57949101552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57949101552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 18996363

AN - SCOPUS:57949101552

VL - 400

SP - 103

EP - 106

JO - Clinica Chimica Acta

JF - Clinica Chimica Acta

SN - 0009-8981

IS - 1-2

ER -