A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning

Philip W. Smith, Harlan Sayles, Angela L Hewlett, R. Jennifer Cavalieri, Shawn G. Gibbs, Mark Edmund Rupp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The environment is increasingly appreciated as a factor in healthcare associated infections. Several methods for measuring environmental contamination are available. Our goal was to compare quantitative microbiology to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection on a sample of hospital surfaces both pre-and post-cleaning, and to assess fluorescent marker results in the same rooms. Methods In a sample of 10 rooms, ATP readings by relative light units (RLU) and quantitative determination of colony forming units (CFU) were measured pre-and post-cleaning on 10 high-touch hospital environmental surfaces. Removal of fluorescent markers (FM) was evaluated post-cleaning in the same rooms. Methods were compared using correlational analyses. Results The ATP readings were usually higher than CFU readings compared with their respective norms for cleanliness. The direction of change in cleanliness assessment (usually down after cleaning) was consistent between the RLU and CFU methods. In addition, CFU and RLU values correlated pre-cleaning, but not post-cleaning. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested a 'clean' cutoff of 8RLU/cm2 for the ATP assay, higher than 2.5RLU/cm2 cutoff most often used. Neither method correlated well with FM results. Conclusions The methods for measuring environmental cleanliness have shown inconsistent correlation, but measure different parameters. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation and predictive value of the three methods for room cleanliness assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-85
Number of pages6
JournalHealthcare Infection
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Stem Cells
Adenosine Triphosphate
Reading
Light
Touch
Cross Infection
Microbiology
ROC Curve

Keywords

  • ATP device
  • environmental cleanliness assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning. / Smith, Philip W.; Sayles, Harlan; Hewlett, Angela L; Cavalieri, R. Jennifer; Gibbs, Shawn G.; Rupp, Mark Edmund.

In: Healthcare Infection, Vol. 18, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 80-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Philip W. ; Sayles, Harlan ; Hewlett, Angela L ; Cavalieri, R. Jennifer ; Gibbs, Shawn G. ; Rupp, Mark Edmund. / A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning. In: Healthcare Infection. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 80-85.
@article{5493f7c09db74df3afba9f0dfc70a5f7,
title = "A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning",
abstract = "Background The environment is increasingly appreciated as a factor in healthcare associated infections. Several methods for measuring environmental contamination are available. Our goal was to compare quantitative microbiology to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection on a sample of hospital surfaces both pre-and post-cleaning, and to assess fluorescent marker results in the same rooms. Methods In a sample of 10 rooms, ATP readings by relative light units (RLU) and quantitative determination of colony forming units (CFU) were measured pre-and post-cleaning on 10 high-touch hospital environmental surfaces. Removal of fluorescent markers (FM) was evaluated post-cleaning in the same rooms. Methods were compared using correlational analyses. Results The ATP readings were usually higher than CFU readings compared with their respective norms for cleanliness. The direction of change in cleanliness assessment (usually down after cleaning) was consistent between the RLU and CFU methods. In addition, CFU and RLU values correlated pre-cleaning, but not post-cleaning. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested a 'clean' cutoff of 8RLU/cm2 for the ATP assay, higher than 2.5RLU/cm2 cutoff most often used. Neither method correlated well with FM results. Conclusions The methods for measuring environmental cleanliness have shown inconsistent correlation, but measure different parameters. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation and predictive value of the three methods for room cleanliness assessment.",
keywords = "ATP device, environmental cleanliness assessment",
author = "Smith, {Philip W.} and Harlan Sayles and Hewlett, {Angela L} and Cavalieri, {R. Jennifer} and Gibbs, {Shawn G.} and Rupp, {Mark Edmund}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1071/HI13001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "80--85",
journal = "Infection, Disease and Health",
issn = "2468-0451",
publisher = "Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning

AU - Smith, Philip W.

AU - Sayles, Harlan

AU - Hewlett, Angela L

AU - Cavalieri, R. Jennifer

AU - Gibbs, Shawn G.

AU - Rupp, Mark Edmund

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background The environment is increasingly appreciated as a factor in healthcare associated infections. Several methods for measuring environmental contamination are available. Our goal was to compare quantitative microbiology to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection on a sample of hospital surfaces both pre-and post-cleaning, and to assess fluorescent marker results in the same rooms. Methods In a sample of 10 rooms, ATP readings by relative light units (RLU) and quantitative determination of colony forming units (CFU) were measured pre-and post-cleaning on 10 high-touch hospital environmental surfaces. Removal of fluorescent markers (FM) was evaluated post-cleaning in the same rooms. Methods were compared using correlational analyses. Results The ATP readings were usually higher than CFU readings compared with their respective norms for cleanliness. The direction of change in cleanliness assessment (usually down after cleaning) was consistent between the RLU and CFU methods. In addition, CFU and RLU values correlated pre-cleaning, but not post-cleaning. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested a 'clean' cutoff of 8RLU/cm2 for the ATP assay, higher than 2.5RLU/cm2 cutoff most often used. Neither method correlated well with FM results. Conclusions The methods for measuring environmental cleanliness have shown inconsistent correlation, but measure different parameters. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation and predictive value of the three methods for room cleanliness assessment.

AB - Background The environment is increasingly appreciated as a factor in healthcare associated infections. Several methods for measuring environmental contamination are available. Our goal was to compare quantitative microbiology to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection on a sample of hospital surfaces both pre-and post-cleaning, and to assess fluorescent marker results in the same rooms. Methods In a sample of 10 rooms, ATP readings by relative light units (RLU) and quantitative determination of colony forming units (CFU) were measured pre-and post-cleaning on 10 high-touch hospital environmental surfaces. Removal of fluorescent markers (FM) was evaluated post-cleaning in the same rooms. Methods were compared using correlational analyses. Results The ATP readings were usually higher than CFU readings compared with their respective norms for cleanliness. The direction of change in cleanliness assessment (usually down after cleaning) was consistent between the RLU and CFU methods. In addition, CFU and RLU values correlated pre-cleaning, but not post-cleaning. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested a 'clean' cutoff of 8RLU/cm2 for the ATP assay, higher than 2.5RLU/cm2 cutoff most often used. Neither method correlated well with FM results. Conclusions The methods for measuring environmental cleanliness have shown inconsistent correlation, but measure different parameters. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation and predictive value of the three methods for room cleanliness assessment.

KW - ATP device

KW - environmental cleanliness assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878299650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878299650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/HI13001

DO - 10.1071/HI13001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878299650

VL - 18

SP - 80

EP - 85

JO - Infection, Disease and Health

JF - Infection, Disease and Health

SN - 2468-0451

IS - 2

ER -