A Simulation Model Including Ovulation Rate, Potential Embryonic Viability, and Uterine Capacity to Explain Litter Size in Mice: I. Model Development and Implementation

E. L.D.A. Ribeiro, M. K. Nielsen, G. L. Bennett, K. A. Leymaster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Litter size in mice was studied using a model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity. Simulated results were compared with experimental results from a selection experiment with mice. The four criteria of selection were selection on number born (LS), selection on an index of ovulation rate and ova success (IX), selection on number born to unilaterally ovariectomized females (UT), and unselected control (LC). Comparisons were made to statistics of the base generation and to responses after 13 generations of selection. Phenotypic and genetic statistics for uterine capacity were generated so that simulations produced the experimental means, standard deviations, and correlations between left and right litter size, as well as responses in number born using the LS, IX, and UT criteria. Statistics for the simulated data generally agreed with observed values. Simulated heritability in the base generation for uterine capacity was .065. Experimental and simulated responses per generation in litter size through 13 generations of selection were .15 and .16, .17 and .18, and .10 and .11 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated responses in uterine capacity after 13 generations were 2.19, 1.60, and 3.40 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated means for the base generation were 13.22 and 16.30 for ovulation rate and uterine capacity, respectively. Uterine capacity was an important component of the variability in litter size; however, ovulation rate was the more limiting component.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-651
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of animal science
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1997

Fingerprint

Litter Size
Ovulation
litter size
ovulation
simulation models
viability
statistics
mice
selection criteria
ova
Patient Selection
Ovum
heritability

Keywords

  • Litter Size
  • Mice
  • Ovulation Rate
  • Selection
  • Simulation
  • Uterus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Cite this

A Simulation Model Including Ovulation Rate, Potential Embryonic Viability, and Uterine Capacity to Explain Litter Size in Mice : I. Model Development and Implementation. / Ribeiro, E. L.D.A.; Nielsen, M. K.; Bennett, G. L.; Leymaster, K. A.

In: Journal of animal science, Vol. 75, No. 3, 03.1997, p. 641-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2f5fd7f9bbc4b8dadaebac2b3c48807,
title = "A Simulation Model Including Ovulation Rate, Potential Embryonic Viability, and Uterine Capacity to Explain Litter Size in Mice: I. Model Development and Implementation",
abstract = "Litter size in mice was studied using a model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity. Simulated results were compared with experimental results from a selection experiment with mice. The four criteria of selection were selection on number born (LS), selection on an index of ovulation rate and ova success (IX), selection on number born to unilaterally ovariectomized females (UT), and unselected control (LC). Comparisons were made to statistics of the base generation and to responses after 13 generations of selection. Phenotypic and genetic statistics for uterine capacity were generated so that simulations produced the experimental means, standard deviations, and correlations between left and right litter size, as well as responses in number born using the LS, IX, and UT criteria. Statistics for the simulated data generally agreed with observed values. Simulated heritability in the base generation for uterine capacity was .065. Experimental and simulated responses per generation in litter size through 13 generations of selection were .15 and .16, .17 and .18, and .10 and .11 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated responses in uterine capacity after 13 generations were 2.19, 1.60, and 3.40 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated means for the base generation were 13.22 and 16.30 for ovulation rate and uterine capacity, respectively. Uterine capacity was an important component of the variability in litter size; however, ovulation rate was the more limiting component.",
keywords = "Litter Size, Mice, Ovulation Rate, Selection, Simulation, Uterus",
author = "Ribeiro, {E. L.D.A.} and Nielsen, {M. K.} and Bennett, {G. L.} and Leymaster, {K. A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2527/1997.753641x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "641--651",
journal = "Journal of Animal Science",
issn = "0021-8812",
publisher = "American Society of Animal Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Simulation Model Including Ovulation Rate, Potential Embryonic Viability, and Uterine Capacity to Explain Litter Size in Mice

T2 - I. Model Development and Implementation

AU - Ribeiro, E. L.D.A.

AU - Nielsen, M. K.

AU - Bennett, G. L.

AU - Leymaster, K. A.

PY - 1997/3

Y1 - 1997/3

N2 - Litter size in mice was studied using a model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity. Simulated results were compared with experimental results from a selection experiment with mice. The four criteria of selection were selection on number born (LS), selection on an index of ovulation rate and ova success (IX), selection on number born to unilaterally ovariectomized females (UT), and unselected control (LC). Comparisons were made to statistics of the base generation and to responses after 13 generations of selection. Phenotypic and genetic statistics for uterine capacity were generated so that simulations produced the experimental means, standard deviations, and correlations between left and right litter size, as well as responses in number born using the LS, IX, and UT criteria. Statistics for the simulated data generally agreed with observed values. Simulated heritability in the base generation for uterine capacity was .065. Experimental and simulated responses per generation in litter size through 13 generations of selection were .15 and .16, .17 and .18, and .10 and .11 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated responses in uterine capacity after 13 generations were 2.19, 1.60, and 3.40 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated means for the base generation were 13.22 and 16.30 for ovulation rate and uterine capacity, respectively. Uterine capacity was an important component of the variability in litter size; however, ovulation rate was the more limiting component.

AB - Litter size in mice was studied using a model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity. Simulated results were compared with experimental results from a selection experiment with mice. The four criteria of selection were selection on number born (LS), selection on an index of ovulation rate and ova success (IX), selection on number born to unilaterally ovariectomized females (UT), and unselected control (LC). Comparisons were made to statistics of the base generation and to responses after 13 generations of selection. Phenotypic and genetic statistics for uterine capacity were generated so that simulations produced the experimental means, standard deviations, and correlations between left and right litter size, as well as responses in number born using the LS, IX, and UT criteria. Statistics for the simulated data generally agreed with observed values. Simulated heritability in the base generation for uterine capacity was .065. Experimental and simulated responses per generation in litter size through 13 generations of selection were .15 and .16, .17 and .18, and .10 and .11 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated responses in uterine capacity after 13 generations were 2.19, 1.60, and 3.40 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated means for the base generation were 13.22 and 16.30 for ovulation rate and uterine capacity, respectively. Uterine capacity was an important component of the variability in litter size; however, ovulation rate was the more limiting component.

KW - Litter Size

KW - Mice

KW - Ovulation Rate

KW - Selection

KW - Simulation

KW - Uterus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031093794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031093794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2527/1997.753641x

DO - 10.2527/1997.753641x

M3 - Article

C2 - 9078478

AN - SCOPUS:0031093794

VL - 75

SP - 641

EP - 651

JO - Journal of Animal Science

JF - Journal of Animal Science

SN - 0021-8812

IS - 3

ER -