A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications

Ronald R. Krueger, Caio S. Meister

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: As a flapless procedure, SMILE brings benefits to refractive surgery, such as lower corneal biomechanical impact, less dry eye risk and less stromal bed exposure. However, the longer learning curve can be a risk factor for complications. This article aims to discuss SMILE complications and proposes a categorized analysis of occurrences, dividing into two groups: intraoperative and postoperative complications. Among intraoperative, we also suggest a subdivision between those related to the laser (lenticule construction), tissue separation (lenticule dissection) and tissue removal (lenticule extraction). Recent findings: The majority of SMILE complications are related to surgeon inexperience and reversible if precociously diagnosed and correctly managed. Intraoperative complications related to lenticule creation such as suction loss, opaque bubble layer and black spots, are correlated with later difficulties during lenticule dissection and removal, and may lead to unwanted situations, such as cap perforation, lenticule tear and cap-lenticule adhesion. Postoperative complications as dry eye, keratitis and ectasia should not be underestimated. Summary: Analyzing what has been reported as major or unique among the complications with SMILE, and dividing them into subgroups, we aim to help refractive surgeons in becoming familiar with the things that can go wrong during SMILE. Early recognition and correct management will be fundamental for optimizing the final visual result.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)292-298
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Intraoperative Complications
Dissection
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Pathologic Dilatations
Learning Curve
Keratitis
Suction
Tears
Lasers
Surgeons
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • SMILE
  • corneal refractive surgery
  • small incision lenticule extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications. / Krueger, Ronald R.; Meister, Caio S.

In: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 292-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{57cfb5e66b874f528475008684327483,
title = "A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications",
abstract = "Purpose of review: As a flapless procedure, SMILE brings benefits to refractive surgery, such as lower corneal biomechanical impact, less dry eye risk and less stromal bed exposure. However, the longer learning curve can be a risk factor for complications. This article aims to discuss SMILE complications and proposes a categorized analysis of occurrences, dividing into two groups: intraoperative and postoperative complications. Among intraoperative, we also suggest a subdivision between those related to the laser (lenticule construction), tissue separation (lenticule dissection) and tissue removal (lenticule extraction). Recent findings: The majority of SMILE complications are related to surgeon inexperience and reversible if precociously diagnosed and correctly managed. Intraoperative complications related to lenticule creation such as suction loss, opaque bubble layer and black spots, are correlated with later difficulties during lenticule dissection and removal, and may lead to unwanted situations, such as cap perforation, lenticule tear and cap-lenticule adhesion. Postoperative complications as dry eye, keratitis and ectasia should not be underestimated. Summary: Analyzing what has been reported as major or unique among the complications with SMILE, and dividing them into subgroups, we aim to help refractive surgeons in becoming familiar with the things that can go wrong during SMILE. Early recognition and correct management will be fundamental for optimizing the final visual result.",
keywords = "SMILE, corneal refractive surgery, small incision lenticule extraction",
author = "Krueger, {Ronald R.} and Meister, {Caio S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ICU.0000000000000494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "292--298",
journal = "Current Opinion in Ophthalmology",
issn = "1040-8738",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications

AU - Krueger, Ronald R.

AU - Meister, Caio S.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Purpose of review: As a flapless procedure, SMILE brings benefits to refractive surgery, such as lower corneal biomechanical impact, less dry eye risk and less stromal bed exposure. However, the longer learning curve can be a risk factor for complications. This article aims to discuss SMILE complications and proposes a categorized analysis of occurrences, dividing into two groups: intraoperative and postoperative complications. Among intraoperative, we also suggest a subdivision between those related to the laser (lenticule construction), tissue separation (lenticule dissection) and tissue removal (lenticule extraction). Recent findings: The majority of SMILE complications are related to surgeon inexperience and reversible if precociously diagnosed and correctly managed. Intraoperative complications related to lenticule creation such as suction loss, opaque bubble layer and black spots, are correlated with later difficulties during lenticule dissection and removal, and may lead to unwanted situations, such as cap perforation, lenticule tear and cap-lenticule adhesion. Postoperative complications as dry eye, keratitis and ectasia should not be underestimated. Summary: Analyzing what has been reported as major or unique among the complications with SMILE, and dividing them into subgroups, we aim to help refractive surgeons in becoming familiar with the things that can go wrong during SMILE. Early recognition and correct management will be fundamental for optimizing the final visual result.

AB - Purpose of review: As a flapless procedure, SMILE brings benefits to refractive surgery, such as lower corneal biomechanical impact, less dry eye risk and less stromal bed exposure. However, the longer learning curve can be a risk factor for complications. This article aims to discuss SMILE complications and proposes a categorized analysis of occurrences, dividing into two groups: intraoperative and postoperative complications. Among intraoperative, we also suggest a subdivision between those related to the laser (lenticule construction), tissue separation (lenticule dissection) and tissue removal (lenticule extraction). Recent findings: The majority of SMILE complications are related to surgeon inexperience and reversible if precociously diagnosed and correctly managed. Intraoperative complications related to lenticule creation such as suction loss, opaque bubble layer and black spots, are correlated with later difficulties during lenticule dissection and removal, and may lead to unwanted situations, such as cap perforation, lenticule tear and cap-lenticule adhesion. Postoperative complications as dry eye, keratitis and ectasia should not be underestimated. Summary: Analyzing what has been reported as major or unique among the complications with SMILE, and dividing them into subgroups, we aim to help refractive surgeons in becoming familiar with the things that can go wrong during SMILE. Early recognition and correct management will be fundamental for optimizing the final visual result.

KW - SMILE

KW - corneal refractive surgery

KW - small incision lenticule extraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049256704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049256704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000494

DO - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000494

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29782336

AN - SCOPUS:85049256704

VL - 29

SP - 292

EP - 298

JO - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

JF - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

SN - 1040-8738

IS - 4

ER -