A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections)

Thomas S. Winokur, Stan McClellan, Gene P. Siegal, David Redden, Prya Gore, Audrey Lazenby, Vishnu Reddy, Catherine M. Listinsky, David A. Conner, Jay Goldman, Gary Grimes, Gregg Vaughn, Jay M. McDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Telepathology is a maturing technology that, for a variety of reasons, has not been widely deployed. In addition, clinical validation is relatively modest compared with accepted telemedicine applications such as teleradiology. A prototype telepathology system (TelePath(sm)) featuring high-resolution images selected from a remote microscope site has been developed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). To validate the diagnostic efficacy of the system, a prospective study was undertaken of parallel diagnoses by conventional microscopy and telepathology with a remotely operated microscope. Slides from 99 intraoperative consultations from 29 tissue/organ sites in the University of Alabama Hospitals by 9 academic pathologists were used in the study. Each microscopic and telepathology diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis rendered by a referee pathologist. Diagnoses were classified as correct, false positive, or false negative or classification error. Of the 99 frozen sections evaluated, 3 cases were deterred. Of the remaining 96 cases, 2 received incorrect diagnoses in both the microscopic and telepathology arms of the study. Three errors occurred only in the telepathology arm. There was 1 false-positive diagnosis, 1 false-negative diagnosis, and 1 classification error. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference between telepathology and conventional microscopy. Qualitative data indicated that the pathologists were generally satisfied with the performance of the system. Telepathology using this system paradigm is sufficiently accurate for real time utilization in a complex surgical environment. Telepathology therefore may be an effective model to support the surgical services of hospitals lacking full-time pathology coverage, resulting in full-time access to anatomic pathology services. (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-785
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Telepathology
Frozen Sections
Referral and Consultation
Microscopy
Hospital Surgery Department
Teleradiology
Pathology
Telemedicine
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Frozen section
  • Telemedicine
  • Telepathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Winokur, T. S., McClellan, S., Siegal, G. P., Redden, D., Gore, P., Lazenby, A., ... McDonald, J. M. (2000). A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections). Human Pathology, 31(7), 781-785. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2000.8452

A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections). / Winokur, Thomas S.; McClellan, Stan; Siegal, Gene P.; Redden, David; Gore, Prya; Lazenby, Audrey; Reddy, Vishnu; Listinsky, Catherine M.; Conner, David A.; Goldman, Jay; Grimes, Gary; Vaughn, Gregg; McDonald, Jay M.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.01.2000, p. 781-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winokur, TS, McClellan, S, Siegal, GP, Redden, D, Gore, P, Lazenby, A, Reddy, V, Listinsky, CM, Conner, DA, Goldman, J, Grimes, G, Vaughn, G & McDonald, JM 2000, 'A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections)', Human Pathology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 781-785. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2000.8452
Winokur, Thomas S. ; McClellan, Stan ; Siegal, Gene P. ; Redden, David ; Gore, Prya ; Lazenby, Audrey ; Reddy, Vishnu ; Listinsky, Catherine M. ; Conner, David A. ; Goldman, Jay ; Grimes, Gary ; Vaughn, Gregg ; McDonald, Jay M. / A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections). In: Human Pathology. 2000 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 781-785.
@article{6fc474565df7499fa01cce02a4610ae7,
title = "A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections)",
abstract = "Telepathology is a maturing technology that, for a variety of reasons, has not been widely deployed. In addition, clinical validation is relatively modest compared with accepted telemedicine applications such as teleradiology. A prototype telepathology system (TelePath(sm)) featuring high-resolution images selected from a remote microscope site has been developed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). To validate the diagnostic efficacy of the system, a prospective study was undertaken of parallel diagnoses by conventional microscopy and telepathology with a remotely operated microscope. Slides from 99 intraoperative consultations from 29 tissue/organ sites in the University of Alabama Hospitals by 9 academic pathologists were used in the study. Each microscopic and telepathology diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis rendered by a referee pathologist. Diagnoses were classified as correct, false positive, or false negative or classification error. Of the 99 frozen sections evaluated, 3 cases were deterred. Of the remaining 96 cases, 2 received incorrect diagnoses in both the microscopic and telepathology arms of the study. Three errors occurred only in the telepathology arm. There was 1 false-positive diagnosis, 1 false-negative diagnosis, and 1 classification error. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference between telepathology and conventional microscopy. Qualitative data indicated that the pathologists were generally satisfied with the performance of the system. Telepathology using this system paradigm is sufficiently accurate for real time utilization in a complex surgical environment. Telepathology therefore may be an effective model to support the surgical services of hospitals lacking full-time pathology coverage, resulting in full-time access to anatomic pathology services. (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.",
keywords = "Clinical trial, Frozen section, Telemedicine, Telepathology",
author = "Winokur, {Thomas S.} and Stan McClellan and Siegal, {Gene P.} and David Redden and Prya Gore and Audrey Lazenby and Vishnu Reddy and Listinsky, {Catherine M.} and Conner, {David A.} and Jay Goldman and Gary Grimes and Gregg Vaughn and McDonald, {Jay M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/hupa.2000.8452",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "781--785",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections)

AU - Winokur, Thomas S.

AU - McClellan, Stan

AU - Siegal, Gene P.

AU - Redden, David

AU - Gore, Prya

AU - Lazenby, Audrey

AU - Reddy, Vishnu

AU - Listinsky, Catherine M.

AU - Conner, David A.

AU - Goldman, Jay

AU - Grimes, Gary

AU - Vaughn, Gregg

AU - McDonald, Jay M.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Telepathology is a maturing technology that, for a variety of reasons, has not been widely deployed. In addition, clinical validation is relatively modest compared with accepted telemedicine applications such as teleradiology. A prototype telepathology system (TelePath(sm)) featuring high-resolution images selected from a remote microscope site has been developed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). To validate the diagnostic efficacy of the system, a prospective study was undertaken of parallel diagnoses by conventional microscopy and telepathology with a remotely operated microscope. Slides from 99 intraoperative consultations from 29 tissue/organ sites in the University of Alabama Hospitals by 9 academic pathologists were used in the study. Each microscopic and telepathology diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis rendered by a referee pathologist. Diagnoses were classified as correct, false positive, or false negative or classification error. Of the 99 frozen sections evaluated, 3 cases were deterred. Of the remaining 96 cases, 2 received incorrect diagnoses in both the microscopic and telepathology arms of the study. Three errors occurred only in the telepathology arm. There was 1 false-positive diagnosis, 1 false-negative diagnosis, and 1 classification error. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference between telepathology and conventional microscopy. Qualitative data indicated that the pathologists were generally satisfied with the performance of the system. Telepathology using this system paradigm is sufficiently accurate for real time utilization in a complex surgical environment. Telepathology therefore may be an effective model to support the surgical services of hospitals lacking full-time pathology coverage, resulting in full-time access to anatomic pathology services. (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

AB - Telepathology is a maturing technology that, for a variety of reasons, has not been widely deployed. In addition, clinical validation is relatively modest compared with accepted telemedicine applications such as teleradiology. A prototype telepathology system (TelePath(sm)) featuring high-resolution images selected from a remote microscope site has been developed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). To validate the diagnostic efficacy of the system, a prospective study was undertaken of parallel diagnoses by conventional microscopy and telepathology with a remotely operated microscope. Slides from 99 intraoperative consultations from 29 tissue/organ sites in the University of Alabama Hospitals by 9 academic pathologists were used in the study. Each microscopic and telepathology diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis rendered by a referee pathologist. Diagnoses were classified as correct, false positive, or false negative or classification error. Of the 99 frozen sections evaluated, 3 cases were deterred. Of the remaining 96 cases, 2 received incorrect diagnoses in both the microscopic and telepathology arms of the study. Three errors occurred only in the telepathology arm. There was 1 false-positive diagnosis, 1 false-negative diagnosis, and 1 classification error. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference between telepathology and conventional microscopy. Qualitative data indicated that the pathologists were generally satisfied with the performance of the system. Telepathology using this system paradigm is sufficiently accurate for real time utilization in a complex surgical environment. Telepathology therefore may be an effective model to support the surgical services of hospitals lacking full-time pathology coverage, resulting in full-time access to anatomic pathology services. (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Frozen section

KW - Telemedicine

KW - Telepathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033930904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033930904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/hupa.2000.8452

DO - 10.1053/hupa.2000.8452

M3 - Article

C2 - 10923912

AN - SCOPUS:0033930904

VL - 31

SP - 781

EP - 785

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 7

ER -